Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Political/War Lounge > Abortion illegal in South Dakota starting July1

Abortion illegal in South Dakota starting July1 (Page 9)
Thread Tools
Pendergast
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2006, 09:04 PM
 
Originally Posted by Railroader
Why not just kill them if you think they might harm you? Why not just kill anyone? Why are you taking away the choice of people to kill indiscriminately?
What's with the death of a few civilians if it gives us a better world?

Freedom comes with its prices you know...

And don't tell me it is different than the deaths in other countries for the sake of Freedom; if youn are OK in accepting the death of civilians in Iraq "for the greater good", then abortion is the coherent choice.

If you disagree with abortion, so should you with the death of the sacred, "innocent civilian life".

If you are to get support from your religion, and that it has to be written in the Bible for you hability to think, then you are a brainless hypocrit, and truly, nothing more than a sheep.
     
lpkmckenna
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2006, 09:23 PM
 
What should happen to women who have illegal abortions? Watch this YouTube video where clueless "pro-life" picketers are asked this question.

See: What should happen to women who have abortions?

So I ask the pro-lifers: what punishment would you propose?
     
lpkmckenna
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2006, 09:36 PM
 
     
BRussell
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Rockies
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2006, 09:36 PM
 
In my view, aborting an unborn baby is wrong, because you don't know anything about the baby. Maybe it would grow up to be a really good baby - who knows?

Instead, abortion ought to be allowed only AFTER the baby is born. That way, you know if you like the baby or not. If it cries a lot or poops or pees all over the place, then get the abortion. Who could blame the parents then?
     
placebo1969
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Washington (the state) USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2006, 10:06 PM
 
Originally Posted by greenG4
Well, they help out the girls who didn't plan on parenthood. I guess "Unplanned Parenthood" would be better huh...
Exactly.
     
Chuckit
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2006, 10:22 PM
 
They help people escape unplanned parenthood. Hence, they are Planned Parenthood.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Railroader
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2006, 10:32 PM
 
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna
No.
Yes.
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna
Come back to reality. Unprotected sex is not the only reason for unplanned pregnancy.
You're the one escaping reality and not allowing people to accept their responsibility. If you are alluding to rape, then that's another issue entirely.
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna
Having an abortion isn't evading responsibility. It's one of several ways to deal with it.
Yes it is. It is an action that is drastic and clears them of their lack of responsibility.
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna
Banning abortion won't make society more accountable. Treating fetuses as if they were morally equivalent to people is flagrantly irrational.
It will make individuals accountable for their actions. Fetuses are life.
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna
I'm all for ABC-style teaching. But that has nothing to do with abortion legality.
You're the one who brought it up. Education will reduce the need for people to skirt their responsibilities of their bad decisions.
     
Railroader
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2006, 10:37 PM
 
Originally Posted by Pendergast
What's with the death of a few civilians if it gives us a better world?
WOW. Just... WOW.
Originally Posted by Pendergast
Freedom comes with its prices you know...
You don't get it do you?
Originally Posted by Pendergast
And don't tell me it is different than the deaths in other countries for the sake of Freedom; if youn are OK in accepting the death of civilians in Iraq "for the greater good", then abortion is the coherent choice.
I am not OK with it. Never said I was.
Originally Posted by Pendergast
If you disagree with abortion, so should you with the death of the sacred, "innocent civilian life".
See above.
Originally Posted by Pendergast
If you are to get support from your religion, and that it has to be written in the Bible for you hability to think, then you are a brainless hypocrit, and truly, nothing more than a sheep.
Huh? It's hard to reply to you when I have no idea what you're talking about. But, I'll try.

I am symbolically a sheep. Jesus is my shepherd. I'll follow His teaching. Not a "religion". How and I a hypocrite?
     
Railroader
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2006, 10:38 PM
 
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna
So I ask the pro-lifers: what punishment would you propose?
The same as any murderer who committed his act in the first degree. But I do not support the states that have capital punishment. That is hypocritical.
     
Railroader
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2006, 10:40 PM
 
Originally Posted by BRussell
In my view, aborting an unborn baby is wrong, because you don't know anything about the baby. Maybe it would grow up to be a really good baby - who knows?

Instead, abortion ought to be allowed only AFTER the baby is born. That way, you know if you like the baby or not. If it cries a lot or poops or pees all over the place, then get the abortion. Who could blame the parents then?
You'd be very welcome in Belgium and the Netherlands where that already kill born children they don't like.

I know you are baiting me and trolling. A usual. You are so predictable.
     
lpkmckenna
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2006, 10:43 PM
 
Time to clear up some myths:



Reasons for abortions
A study revealed that women reported the following reasons for choosing an abortion:
25.5% Want to postpone childbearing
21.3% Cannot afford a baby
14.1% Has relationship problem or partner does not want pregnancy
12.2% Too young; parent(s) or other(s) object to pregnancy
10.8% Having a child will disrupt education or job
7.9% Want no (more) children
3.3% Risk to fetal health
2.8% Risk to maternal health
2.1% Rape, Incest, Other
Source: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/2411798.html

Some much for the "godless horny teenagers" argument.
     
lpkmckenna
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2006, 10:46 PM
 
Originally Posted by Railroader
The same as any murderer who committed his act in the first degree.
Such a law would never get passed in the US, Europe, or Canada.
     
Railroader
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2006, 10:51 PM
 
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna
Some much for the "godless horny teenagers" argument.
HUH?!?! Are you making stuff up now?
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna
Time to clear up some myths:



Reasons for abortions
A study revealed that women reported the following reasons for choosing an abortion:
25.5% Want to postpone childbearing
21.3% Cannot afford a baby
14.1% Has relationship problem or partner does not want pregnancy
12.2% Too young; parent(s) or other(s) object to pregnancy
10.8% Having a child will disrupt education or job
7.9% Want no (more) children
3.3% Risk to fetal health
2.8% Risk to maternal health
2.1% Rape, Incest, Other
Source: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/2411798.html
This is very helpful. It looks like about 91.8% of abortions are due to lack of responsibility. EVERYONE who is intelligent should be immediately against those abortions. We'll discuss the other 8.2% when that is done.
     
Railroader
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2006, 10:53 PM
 
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna
Such a law would never get passed in the US, Europe, or Canada.
I am a dreamer sometimes, I know.

I'll be realistic. No jail time, but a $5,000 fine and community service, to be used to educate children on the risks of unprotected sex.
     
lpkmckenna
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2006, 10:57 PM
 
Originally Posted by Railroader
I'll be realistic. No jail time, but a $5,000 fine and community service, to be used to educate children on the risks of unprotected sex.
Hey, while we're at it, why not a big scarlet "A" pinned to her clothes?
     
BRussell
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Rockies
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2006, 11:13 PM
 
Originally Posted by Railroader
You'd be very welcome in Belgium and the Netherlands where that already kill born children they don't like.

I know you are baiting me and trolling. A usual. You are so predictable.
You really need to lighten up and stop taking yourself so seriously. You'll live longer.
     
dcmacdaddy
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Madison, WI
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2006, 12:04 AM
 
Originally Posted by Railroader
I say [life begins at] conception. No one knows for sure, but I am playing it safe. You can be reckless with human life, I'll play this part of my life conservatively.
Fine. You play it conservatively and don't try and interfere with others who don't want to play it conservatively. Deal?

Or, are you still going to insist on forcing others to play it conservatively even if they don't want to by pushing to outlaw abortion?
One should never stop striving for clarity of thought and precision of expression.
I would prefer my humanity sullied with the tarnish of science rather than the gloss of religion.
     
Railroader
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2006, 02:45 AM
 
Originally Posted by dcmacdaddy
Fine. You play it conservatively and don't try and interfere with others who don't want to play it conservatively. Deal?

Or, are you still going to insist on forcing others to play it conservatively even if they don't want to by pushing to outlaw abortion?
Yes. Many laws are "forced" upon us. I have no problem "forcing" a law protecting human life.
     
Railroader
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2006, 02:47 AM
 
Originally Posted by BRussell
You really need to lighten up and stop taking yourself so seriously. You'll live longer.
I am more concerned about unborn children. I think you need to take yourself more seriously. Have a little respect for yourself instead of making yourself look like a tasteless crude fool.
     
Railroader
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2006, 02:48 AM
 
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna
Hey, while we're at it, why not a big scarlet "A" pinned to her clothes?
Ahhh.... I see, you are not going to take this matter seriously at all. And you probably wonder why you have so little respect around here. You just like to argue for the sake of arguing.
     
Chuckit
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2006, 03:05 AM
 
Originally Posted by Railroader
Yes. Many laws are "forced" upon us. I have no problem "forcing" a law protecting human life.
You eat meat? From creatures with a far greater level of self-awareness than an early-stage fetus, perhaps? I'd be much more concerned about them than an unthinking, unfeeling mass of growing human cells.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
stwain2003
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In front of my LCD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2006, 03:08 AM
 
Originally Posted by James L
It is nice to see that they are wrapping this up so they can move on to other progressive changes, like maybe the return of slavery, or the removal of a woman's right to vote.

Maybe they'll take away a murderer's right to murder also! Oh no!
8GB iPhone
Coming Soon: Mac mini Core 2 Duo 2.0Ghz
     
Uncle Skeleton
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Rockville, MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2006, 03:30 AM
 
Originally Posted by Railroader
I am more concerned about unborn children.
I don't get this. Doesn't all birth control destroy unborn children? Are you concerned about all the unborn children that never got past the stage of twinkle-in-their-fathers'-eye?

Likewise:
I say conception. No one knows for sure, but I am playing it safe.
How is that playing it safe? Aren't you cutting off all the poor defenseless sperm and eggs? How do you know the soul isn't granted at the stage when the ova are released, or when the sperm are ejaculated? I think your chosen "safe" line is entirely arbitrary on the continuum of the life cycle.
     
Chuckit
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2006, 03:40 AM
 
Originally Posted by Uncle Skeleton
I don't get this. Doesn't all birth control destroy unborn children? Are you concerned about all the unborn children that never got past the stage of twinkle-in-their-fathers'-eye?
Apparently it's only an unborn child when it has its full set of chromosomes.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Uncle Skeleton
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Rockville, MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2006, 04:06 AM
 
I have a cell line at work that has a full human set of chromosomes. If Railroader finds that out is he going to try to charge me for murder every time I kill some of them?
     
lpkmckenna
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2006, 06:08 AM
 
Originally Posted by Railroader
Ahhh.... I see, you are not going to take this matter seriously at all.
Wrong. I take this issue very seriously.
Originally Posted by Railroader
And you probably wonder why you have so little respect around here.
Wrong. I think I am respected by my fellow liberals and hated by you ultraconservatives.
Originally Posted by Railroader
You just like to argue for the sake of arguing.
Wrong again. I'm arguing for something: women's liberty. And I'm arguing against something: religious absurdity.

Three strikes: you're out.
     
Kevin
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2006, 04:05 PM
 
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna
I think I am respected by my fellow liberals and hated by you ultraconservatives.
Actually would you like me to point out the many, many times a lefty has told you that you were using horrible arguments? Or that you were being trollish?

You sucked at arguing when you came to this forum, and you are still pulling the same tired tactics you were busted for then.

Nothing has change.

The pro abortion folks just can't base their arguments on rational thought.

You have to pretend something is totally different than what it actually is to make yourselves feel better about your choice of belief.

And I really don't think it's because you think it's right.

But because it's what "Your side" is for. So you are as well.
     
 
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:04 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,