|
|
Nancy Pelosi / Dubya share low approval rating
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why is it that a 40% approval rating is awful when it comes to being the President - but it's no big deal when the Speaker of the House has a similar approval rating? I can't help but think that a 40% approval rating has to be a bad thing - no matter what elected position you hold.
Hell, Nancy Pelosi is *starting* with a low approval rating! All indications are that it can go nowhere but down. At least Dubya had something close to an 85% approval rating in 2001 when he began his term. If Nancy Pelosi were to drop the same 45 percentage points in approval, she would be in the negative numbers.
I just find it odd that Dubya is portrayed as having "failed" based on his approval rating, but Nancy Pelosi is portrayed as having succeeded.
This is going to be the best 2 years the Republicans could ever hope for. All indications seem to point to the fact that Democrats are going to do exactly what they promised not to do. The same issues they tout as being the reason they were elected - are the issues they are abandoning. Even a drooling idiot could have predicted as much.
(links to approval polls)
Political Tracking Poll: Nancy Pelosi
FOXNews.com - President Bush's Approval Rating - Polls | AP Polls | Gallup Poll | Opinion Polls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Back in the Good Ole US of A
Status:
Offline
|
|
First, I think any polls on Pelosi are premature. I would argue that most Americans haven't a clue about the woman.
Second, you're comparing apples and oranges. If you compare her rating with the outgoing Speaker (who was at 24%), she's doing very well.
Third, it was 43%.. not 40%... not sure why you decided to round DOWN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
Everyone's angry at Congress right now. I'm in support of a constitutional Amendment disqualifying anyone in the last Congress from ever holding public office again, not even as dogcatcher, because they did such a lousy job.
I'm more suprised that 5% of respondants consider Pelosi "conservative". I'd hate to see what they consider "liberal"....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
The only time Bush had an 85% approval rating was in the 3 months after 9/11. Oddly enough, that spike he enjoyed was not from anything Bush had done up to that point, but based on what he promised to do about the problem, after the fact. Apparently people thought he didn't do a good enough job.
Bush started with a 55-60% in the first 9 months, not 85%, but what are facts anyway? Bush was directly elected by the US people in a one-on-one election, so him having an approval slightly greater than 50% sounds about right.
Pelosi was not directly elected by the US people, so despite the Democrats being elected into a majority this past election, it was not due to Pelosi.
(
Last edited by Warren Pease; Jan 5, 2007 at 08:58 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Rockies
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 1999
Location: New York City
Status:
Offline
|
|
i'm not surprised...she looks mean and it looks like some spankin' is a do....
i wouldn't want her to be my mom / grandmother but i'm glad she's the speaker!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spliffdaddy
Why is it that a 40% approval rating is awful when it comes to being the President - but it's no big deal when the Speaker of the House has a similar approval rating?
Media bias?
Pelosi is playing it pretty loose and making some huge mistakes. I am surprised more people don't disapprove of her.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spliffdaddy
.
This is going to be the best 2 years the Republicans could ever hope for. All indications seem to point to the fact that Democrats are going to do exactly what they promised not to do. The same issues they tout as being the reason they were elected - are the issues they are abandoning. Even a drooling idiot could have predicted as much.
yyep.
If we are lucky we'll get a good 3rd party into the mix. Both sides make me sick to my stomach for one reason or another, mainly just about selling us out to maintain their power/wealth.
Everyone's angry at Congress right now. I'm in support of a constitutional Amendment disqualifying anyone in the last Congress from ever holding public office again, not even as dogcatcher, because they did such a lousy job.
Are you that obtuse? unemployment would go through the roof!!!! .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Railroader
Media bias?
Liberals have neocons and conservatives have media bias
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: I don't know anymore!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by BRussell
Don't bring facts into this. Spin is much easier to regurgitate.
|
Why is there always money for war, but none for education?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Rockies
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by KarlG
Don't bring facts into this. Spin is much easier to regurgitate.
Sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|