Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Consumer Hardware & Components > 1680 X 1050 too low of a resolution for a 22" screen

1680 X 1050 too low of a resolution for a 22" screen
Thread Tools
tkmd
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 17, 2006, 08:20 AM
 
looking at picking up 22 inch lcd from gateway. But its resolution is only 1680x1050 which is the same as in the MBP 17"!!! I'm afraid that the resolution is too low for viewing lets say two word docs side by side
Pismo 400 | Powerbook 1.5 GHz | MacPro 2.66/6GB/7300GT
     
SSharon
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Teaneck, NJ
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 17, 2006, 12:04 PM
 
I think it can fit 2 documents side by side. my ibook screen is 1024 wide and a word document takes up maybe 65% of that width.
AT&T iPhone 5S and 6; 13" MBP; MDD G4.
     
iMacfan
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 17, 2006, 12:34 PM
 
Yes, it is a little bit low for that size for a modern screen, but it all depends on how far away you sit, your eyesight and personal preference. If you're the type that used to go for 19" 1280x1024 screens, even though the res was the same as a 17", then it should suit you well.

David
http://www.ppconmac.com - Mac compatability for your PocketPC!
     
Cadaver
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ~/
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 18, 2006, 05:16 PM
 
20-22" LCDs tend to be 1680 x 1050. Hit the 23" and 24" for 1920 x 1200.
     
mduell
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 19, 2006, 03:42 PM
 
If you want more pixels, there are 22" 3840x2400 LCDs available; the IBM T221 comes to mind.
     
MichiganRich
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Michigan, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 20, 2006, 03:08 PM
 
Does that IBM come with a microscope to read the UI text?
     
mduell
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 20, 2006, 09:09 PM
 
Originally Posted by MichiganRich View Post
Does that IBM come with a microscope to read the UI text?
What broken OS/apps are you using that can't scale fonts?
     
ecking01
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 20, 2006, 09:41 PM
 
i agree tha 22" is too big a screen for 1680x1050 resolution. Just get a 20"
     
megasad
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 22, 2006, 10:51 PM
 
Originally Posted by mduell View Post
What broken OS/apps are you using that can't scale fonts?
Mac OS X? I know that's specifically why I got a 1280x1024 19" screen; the text in system menus was too small otherwise. But as was said already, it's all to do with how good your eyes are and mine are not good.
BayBook (13" MacBook Pro, 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo, 4GB RAM, 1TB HD) // BayPhone (iPhone 4, 32GB, black)
     
venom600
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Pomona
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 24, 2006, 11:02 PM
 
I just picked up a Westinghouse 22" monitor (on sale for Black Friday) and it looks great. Sitting next to my MacBook Pro, the pixel density isn't nearly as high, but it still works for the size. This is the size and resolution of the original Cinema Display from back in the day, so it is certainly useable.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:02 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,