|
|
mac os x beta
|
|
|
|
bobo
|
|
has anyone read the news from macweek? i just can't wait to see what they have improved in this beta version of osx from dp3.
it is a really long wait, isn't it? it sometimes seem to me the arrival of osx is all so slow, but then again, it's may already.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hi,
Next Monday Steve Jobs gets on stage at the WWDC and yammers it up to all the Mac OS developers about OS X. Everyone expects OS X beta to be the big news.
WWDC
Scott H.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
In between now and Monday I have to read about 200 pages, write a paper, take two midterms, and work about 16 hours. I'm actually looking forward to all of this as it just brings the keynote ever closer. I've never awaited a beta release like this before- I've been using DP3 more and more in the past few weeks (learning Obj-C too.. what an amazing language!!!) and beta will be.. well it'll be awesome!! OK that was totally random of me.. just had to tell someone. Oh, and does anyone know of a good message board for asking programming related questions? thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
you have a programming question about objective c? shoot. i've been studying it too lately; i can't gaurantee that i can help, but maybe.
i also know c, java, some c++, a little shell scripting, and i don't count html as a language.
i once knew fortran, but i never used it.
www.gnustep.org has mailing lists and they also use objective c. you might check them out
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Actually my question has to do with procedural C and a stupid little program I'm trying to port to Carbon. It's basically the first thing I ever did in programming, and uses quickdraw to animate a rectangle moving across the screen. The animation was choppy so I went in and implemented an offscreen GWorld to make it smoother. Everything worked great in Classic, but the GWorld routines (and all the sample code) take a LOT of advantage of Quickdraw structs and such- not good object-oriented practice. I ported it and am using all the appropriate accessor functions, but for some reason the GWorld code refuses to draw anything to my window. I've even got some new sample code from the Apple site and I still don't know what I'm doing wrong! If you know anything about this, I'd be glad to send you the project file! Thanks...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hi,
Oh, and does anyone know of a good message board for asking programming related questions? thanks!
Hit the comp.lang.objective-c news group. The trafic there is not that high but it seems to be high quality trafic.
Scott H.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hi there
mosr just reported that the Application Menu in OSX (where the Apple Menu is now) may be text based- great idea but that would mean the File/Edit, etc. menus would move all over the place, depending on the length of the name of the app. Stupid.
Good idea to be text based but not on the left...
rumour probably rubbish anyway
Chris
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, MOSR reports so much crap that I'm sure over 90% of it is completely unfounded. What Apple probably did was put an option kind of like in OS 8.5+ where you can have the app name displayed in the application menu. I actually quite like this feature, although you're right, being on the left side could make the standard menus jump around. Not sure how much of a problem that would actually be but it'll be interesting to see what they actually do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bobo
|
|
just another thought about OSX beta. I wonder why Apple won't make it public, I mean like beta versions of Windows. I remeber when I was still using PC at home several years ago, I got a beta version of Windows 98. And my friend was no developer associated with Microsoft. I wonder why wouldn't Apple do that. I'd willing to pay certain amount, say 30-50 dollars to try the beta release.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: May 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
A public beta would be very nice. OS X has been hyped & anticipated for so many years now (remember Rhapsody?) that not allowing the larger Mac community to have the opportunity to use a beta version risks the possibility of waning interest, IMHO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Palatine, IL
Status:
Offline
|
|
Orbit, you summed up the excitement in your first post here elegantly. I think this buzz is part of the reason Apple prolly will not release a public beta. The other reason is that Apple has historically been such a closed shop. It's kind of annoying in a way, but really its good. So many of these discussion threads would be useless if they just told us exactly how everything would be ahead of time, and then gave us the betas. DP's are one thing, but full public beta would be nuts. Everyone would be clamoring for improvement requests etc ad nauseum for the two months before the final release, when the co. needs to worry about details, not adding features and whatnot. The thing about the buzz is that Apple gains fans this way. We sit here and root for them instead of complaining this way. It's sort of a twisted psychology thing, but i think we all love it! MS gets harangued because they promise but don't deliver, but we praise Apple because they don't tell us until it's ready, and it's awesome!
|
<a href="http://www.macronyms.com" target="_blank"> </a>
kelsevinal: i am impervious to your "nerd" attacks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|