|
|
Harry Potter 7 - No Spoilers! (Page 3)
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The deep backwoods of the PNW
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
So, exactly the same as witchcraft then.
Except that the magic in Harry Potter wasn't available to just anyone. From what I've read, modern wiccan and pagan beliefs teach that everyone is god and that everyone has the power; they just have to learn how to use it.
Harry Potter ultimately teaches that nobody is god and that every wizard out there, no matter how great and honorable, is fallible and screws up - and abuses their power at one point or another.
|
Sell or send me your vintage Mac things if you don't want them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by shifuimam
Except that the magic in Harry Potter wasn't available to just anyone. From what I've read, modern wiccan and pagan beliefs teach that everyone is god and that everyone has the power; they just have to learn how to use it.
Yes, but modern wiccans and pagans are idiots. I'm talking about proper witchcraft. Sure, it's available to all - but some are more "gifted" than the rest and will find it extremely easy going (the Harry Potters, so to speak) and some will never get it no matter how hard they try, even though it's latent in them (the mundanes - "muggles" in Potter speak?).
Originally Posted by shifuimam
Harry Potter ultimately teaches that nobody is god
Now, I admit to not having read them so this is an honest question: Does it teach that nobody is god because there is no god? That might have a bearing on the anti-Potter stuff you hear from certain churches.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
AFAICT there is no mention of religion at all. New Age stuff like clairvoyance gets attacked a good bit though which I found amusing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by - - e r i k - -
AFAICT there is no mention of religion at all.
There ya go then - that's probably what they're fussing about. Now, if only JK would have gone about it like Francis Barrett's The Magus and given God the credit for the abilities then it'd all probably be hunky dory.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
There ya go then - that's probably what they're fussing about. Now, if only JK would have gone about it like Francis Barrett's The Magus and given God the credit for the abilities then it'd all probably be hunky dory.
She did, but on the sly. It's genetic with an occasional mutation popping up (Hermione, for example, is from muggle parents). That means that effectively "God gave them their powers" without coming out and saying as much, and without any of the (I think) unnecessary religious overtones in Barrett's work. You see, there are good wizards and bad wizards in Harry's universe, and if God gave the bad wizards their powers, then how would that play to the religious crowd? It's necessary for Rowling's stories that it is the individual PEOPLE who choose which way they'll go, not being fated or compelled to be good or evil.
By the way, I've had time for about 15 pages, and they've been great. Darn home work!
|
Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ghporter
She did, but on the sly. It's genetic with an occasional mutation popping up (Hermione, for example, is from muggle parents). That means that effectively "God gave them their powers" without coming out and saying as much, and without any of the (I think) unnecessary religious overtones in Barrett's work.
THAT is effectively saying "God gave them their powers"? I'd like to see the mental acrobatics that made you reach that conclusion. You might as well say that it effectively is saying that effectively "Darwin gave them their powers"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
Yes, but modern wiccans and pagans are idiots. I'm talking about proper witchcraft. Sure, it's available to all - but some are more "gifted" than the rest and will find it extremely easy going (the Harry Potters, so to speak) and some will never get it no matter how hard they try, even though it's latent in them (the mundanes - "muggles" in Potter speak?).
It's never said that magic is latent in everybody in the Harry Potter series. Wizards have magic (and it will actually manifest on its own even if they suck at controlling it), muggles don't.
Originally Posted by Doofy
Now, I admit to not having read them so this is an honest question: Does it teach that nobody is god because there is no god? That might have a bearing on the anti-Potter stuff you hear from certain churches.
Nah, religion is basically avoided. But a very strong theme in the series is that being more powerful than someone else doesn't make you better than them. It's constantly emphasized that the villain of the series is the most magically gifted wizard in the world, and he wants to use that to rule over everybody else, but what matters about Harry is his love for his friends. It's really good Christian values — I can't imagine how anyone could read the books and think, "Hey, this chick is trying to teach my children to love others and stand up for what they know is right! How dare she?!"
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The deep backwoods of the PNW
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Chuckit
It's never said that magic is latent in everybody in the Harry Potter series. Wizards have magic (and it will actually manifest on its own even if they suck at controlling it), muggles don't.
Right. Not even that, but there are kids that are born to families with a strong wizard bloodline who have no wizarding abilities - they're called squibs in the Harry Potter series. The books make it very clear that what these kids do is learn how to use a genetically-provided capability, which is quite different from what I understand witchcraft/wicca/paganism to teach.
...but what matters about Harry is his love for his friends. It's really good Christian values — I can't imagine how anyone could read the books and think, "Hey, this chick is trying to teach my children to love others and stand up for what they know is right! How dare she?!"
That's what really gets me. These books can teach excellent values to kids - love, loyalty, trust, honesty, personal strength, confidence...
That Wikipedia article has an image from a Jack Chick tract where the girl claims that Harry Potter let her into things related to the occult (ouija boards, crystal balls, etc.). Like someone else mentioned, the book actually mocks the whole New Age psychic crap. Granted, Professor Trelawney did speak two prophecies in her lifetime, but God gave prophecies to people in the old testament specifically about the state the world was in and how Christ's actions were going to redeem mankind. Trelawney gave prophecies that basically told how Voldemort was going to be defeated. But the crap that Jack Chick mentions? Hell no! I'm wondering if he even read the books.
|
Sell or send me your vintage Mac things if you don't want them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A House of Ill-Repute in the Sky
Status:
Offline
|
|
So does someone in here actually believe these books promote kids becoming real life wizards or something?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by - - e r i k - -
THAT is effectively saying "God gave them their powers"? I'd like to see the mental acrobatics that made you reach that conclusion. You might as well say that it effectively is saying that effectively "Darwin gave them their powers"
Who are we to say that God did NOT use genetics to create us? And Darwin didn't do anything but explain the process. Being a scientist does not negate the possibility of a person being spiritual you know. The mechanism our Creator chose to do that creating need not be mumbo jumbo and a bunch of hand waving and magic words. It's impudent to suggest some limit to the mechanisms the Creator may have considered or used. That's like saying "God created a rock He couldn't lift."
Originally Posted by shifuimam
That Wikipedia article has an image from a Jack Chick tract where the girl claims that Harry Potter let her into things related to the occult (ouija boards, crystal balls, etc.)..
Jack Chick must have done some SERIOUS acid back in the '60s. Since about then, his tracts have been consistently built of fantasy and hallucinations. Gotta wonder which side he's really on...
|
Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
By the way, I finished the book last night. I enjoyed it a lot, though I think Stephen King had it dead-on when he said the end of the series was bound to be imperfect because nobody wants it to end.
As for the ending itself, I thought it worked. I would have liked to have seen more of all the characters after the battle rather than the epilogue — for instance, it felt kind of wrong that we didn't get to see them actually mourning Fred or have him appear as a Hallows-ghost — but I thought the ending tied things up well enough.
I liked Snape's chapter a lot. It gave a good overview of the character and clarified his motivation without totally revising him and making him out to be some knight on a white horse.
I was bummed that Ginny did practically nothing, though. Rowling had spent that last two books setting her up as being totally awesome, and her only scene in this book is kissing Harry, then he avoids her the whole rest of the time. Letdown! At least the Weasley twins and Luna were on form.
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The deep backwoods of the PNW
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Chuckit
By the way, I finished the book last night. I enjoyed it a lot, though I think Stephen King had it dead-on when he said the end of the series was bound to be imperfect because nobody wants it to end.
As for the ending itself, I thought it worked. I would have liked to have seen more of all the characters after the battle rather than the epilogue — for instance, it felt kind of wrong that we didn't get to see them actually mourning Fred or have him appear as a Hallows-ghost — but I thought the ending tied things up well enough.
I liked Snape's chapter a lot. It gave a good overview of the character and clarified his motivation without totally revising him and making him out to be some knight on a white horse.
I was bummed that Ginny did practically nothing, though. Rowling had spent that last two books setting her up as being totally awesome, and her only scene in this book is kissing Harry, then he avoids her the whole rest of the time. Letdown! At least the Weasley twins and Luna were on form.
Yeah - it feels weird to know that there's no more books coming in the future. At least we've got two more movies to look forward to - and lots and lots of merchandising!
Speaking of which, I can't wait to see this one in movie form. If they make the battle scene anything like the ones in Narnia and the Lord of the Rings movies, it's going to be incredible.
|
Sell or send me your vintage Mac things if you don't want them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
Has anyone else had difficulty in finding the last movie? Goblet of fire seems to have disappeared, I'm wondering if they are waiting to re-release it or something. Anyone know?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ghporter
Who are we to say that God did NOT use genetics to create us?
We are rational beings who don't have to invent supernatural explanations for things we don't understand, that's who
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by crushonjlw123
Has anyone else had difficulty in finding the last movie? Goblet of fire seems to have disappeared, I'm wondering if they are waiting to re-release it or something. Anyone know?
I've found two different versions in stock at Amazon. Take your pick: - Amazon.com: Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (Widescreen Edition) (Harry Potter 4): DVD: Eric Sykes,Timothy Spall,David Tennant,Daniel Radcliffe,Emma Watson (II),Rupert Grint,Mark Williams,James Phelps,Oliver Phelps,Bonnie Wright,Jeff Rawle,Robert
- Amazon.com: Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (Two-Disc Special Edition) (Harry Potter 4): DVD: Eric Sykes,Timothy Spall,David Tennant,Daniel Radcliffe,Emma Watson (II),Rupert Grint,Mark Williams,James Phelps,Oliver Phelps,Bonnie Wright,Jeff Rawle,
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern VA - Just outside DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ok...so WHO is this "Ron" Character then???
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The deep backwoods of the PNW
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by crushonjlw123
Has anyone else had difficulty in finding the last movie? Goblet of fire seems to have disappeared, I'm wondering if they are waiting to re-release it or something. Anyone know?
Buy it while you can. DVD's getting discontinued in like a month. Granted, they discontined the first two at the beginning of the year and they're still in stock, but the price is eventually going to go up.
I just really, really, really hope they're not planning on releasing movies 5-7 on HD-DVD and/or Blu-Ray only. They'd better release them on standard DVDs...
Originally Posted by Y3a
Ok...so WHO is this "Ron" Character then???
You are hi-freakin-larious.
|
Sell or send me your vintage Mac things if you don't want them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Dakarʒ
So does someone in here actually believe these books promote kids becoming real life wizards or something?
There are real life wizards?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A House of Ill-Repute in the Sky
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Dakarʒ
So does someone in here actually believe these books promote kids becoming real life wizards or something?
You're getting that confused with Dungeons & Dragons.
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A House of Ill-Repute in the Sky
Status:
Offline
|
|
Let's LARP at the local abandoned mine!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Dakarʒ
Let's LARP at the local abandoned mine!
You'll have to get past the Gorvil, first.
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A House of Ill-Repute in the Sky
Status:
Offline
|
|
You people are full of names I don't know today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Dakarʒ
You people are full of names I don't know today.
I assumed you were talking about Mazes & Monsters.
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|