|
|
Dial Up Users: Want iLife?
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ugh, Well, I was going to say before Safari boggled up my message:
If anyone is interested in receiving a burned copy of the free iLife apps, I will send them to you. I'm asking for donations of $2 via PayPal (for shipping and handling) but they aren't required (but would sure help).
Private message me with address and email.
mitchell_pgh
(
Last edited by mitchell_pgh; Jan 20, 2003 at 06:00 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
perhaps we can try this again...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status:
Offline
|
|
Im guessing you mean the free iLife apps? and not iDVD?
|
we don't have time to stop for gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Pit Slab #35
Status:
Offline
|
|
Still illegal I am sure. ?
|
I tried to sig-spam the forums.
ADVANTAGE Motorsports Marketing, Inc. • speedXdesign, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status:
Offline
|
|
Maybe he means Safari. Still, don't tell Apple.
|
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't see how this can be illegal as I'm giving it away, and you still have to agree to the license (AKA Install it)
Then again, perhaps it is illegal... but when I was on dial-up, it would have been nice...
P.S. I was only talking about the free apps (if they are over 20MB, some people are going to have issues)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Utah, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mitchell_pgh:
I don't see how this can be illegal as I'm giving it away, and you still have to agree to the license (AKA Install it)
Then again, perhaps it is illegal... but when I was on dial-up, it would have been nice...
P.S. I was only talking about the free apps (if they are over 20MB, some people are going to have issues)
You can only make copies for your personal use. Giving them away to other people (even for free) is 100% illegal. Also, receiving them is a crime as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
You can only make copies for your personal use. Giving them away to other people (even for free) is 100% illegal. Also, receiving them is a crime as well.
... and that's what you get for trying to be nice. I'd say: anyone want the apps, don't post it here but mail our good man mitchell. Give Apple a run for their money in trying to prove that he's actually sent the apps to anyone... Not that they would bother.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Utah, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Hozie:
... and that's what you get for trying to be nice. I'd say: anyone want the apps, don't post it here but mail our good man mitchell. Give Apple a run for their money in trying to prove that he's actually sent the apps to anyone... Not that they would bother.
Being nice is one thing. Committing a crime is another...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Retired.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mitchell_pgh:
I don't see how this can be illegal as I'm giving it away, and you still have to agree to the license (AKA Install it)
Then again, perhaps it is illegal... but when I was on dial-up, it would have been nice...
P.S. I was only talking about the free apps (if they are over 20MB, some people are going to have issues)
iMovie 3 I've heard is over 60 MB in size...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chico, CA and Carlsbad, CA.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by skyman:
Being nice is one thing. Committing a crime is another...
Get over it.
|
"In Nomine Patris, Et Fili, Et Spiritus Sancti"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: San Francisco, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by skyman:
Being nice is one thing. Committing a crime is another...
Show who's being hurt in the above scenario.
My motto:
"Never do anything immoral. Consider before doing something illegal."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Utah, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by [APi]TheMan:
Get over it.
Instead of using a unintelligent statement like "Get over it". Why don't you defend your position in an intelligent manner? Or, is that not possible for you to do?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: canadia
Status:
Offline
|
|
how is distributing free apps for free a crime?
|
= decursive =
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Utah, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by decursive:
how is distributing free apps for free a crime?
Because it violates Apples license agreement that you must agree to before installing the applications. When you violate a license agreement you have committed a crime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by skyman:
Because it violates Apples license agreement that you must agree to before installing the applications. When you violate a license agreement you have committed a crime.
http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/
Where does it say that I agree to anything?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The end of a catwalk with no way out but down.
Status:
Offline
|
|
the installer tells you that it is illegal. It is EXTRA illegal if you are collecting money for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by decursive:
how is distributing free apps for free a crime?
Because unfortunately, thanks to an inane system of copyright which allows companies to dictate the terms under which you will use software rather than relying on standard copyright to prevent illegal redistribution (which is precisely the purpose copyright was designed for), Apple can tell you it's a crime and so it's a crime.
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Utah, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
When you install the application not when you download it. Read the post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chico, CA and Carlsbad, CA.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by skyman:
Instead of using a unintelligent statement like "Get over it". Why don't you defend your position in an intelligent manner? Or, is that not possible for you to do?
Unintelligent? I think not. I think that you, skyman, can do nothing about what mitchell is proposing.
MacGameFiles.com offers a service such as mitchell's, probably somewhat more lawful than mitchell's method, but the idea is the same.
I'm with what Hozie said:
I'd say: anyone want the apps, don't post it here but mail our good man mitchell
Therefore, skyman, instead of running into this thread like a man that's gone postal and shooting at everyone, drop your gun and evaluate the situation. This thread was about mitchell trying to be courteous to fellow mac users that are not as fortunate to have broadband internet. You stated your opinion once, and now you and I have just begun to pollute the thread. Arg.
|
"In Nomine Patris, Et Fili, Et Spiritus Sancti"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Emotionally Fragile Luke:
the installer tells you that it is illegal. It is EXTRA illegal if you are collecting money for it.
Yowie - EXTRA illegal?!? Is that a technical term? Is it kind of like extra dead?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: canadia
Status:
Offline
|
|
to quote the license:
3. Transfer. You may not rent, lease, lend or sublicense the Apple Software. You may, however, make a one-time permanent transfer of all of your license rights to the Apple Software to another party, provided that: (a) the transfer must include all of the Apple Software, including all its component parts, original media, printed materials and this License; (b) you do not retain any copies of the Apple Software, full or partial, including copies stored on a computer or other storage device; and (c) the party receiving the Apple Software reads and agrees to accept the terms and conditions of this License.
so it seems to me that he could transfer the rights to anybody else, giving up his rights to the software, and then download the software again, thus regaining his rights to it. right?
|
= decursive =
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Somewhere, but not here.
Status:
Offline
|
|
it was not that long ago that apple stopped mags like macaddict and macworld from giving copies of software on their monthly cd's, even though they were free updates to system software etc. bottom line is that apple owns the software and it is their decision as to how it is distributed.
sure, it's really nice to offer to make cd copies for those on dialup, but the $2 may get apple a little bit peeved - some of those people may have spent the $49 from apple to buy the package.
|
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Seoul/New York
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by skyman:
Because it violates Apples license agreement that you must agree to before installing the applications. When you violate a license agreement you have committed a crime.
Violating a license agreement is not necessarily a crime. It's just a violation of an agreement. You can enter into an agreement not to eat turkey sandwiches...and just because you eat one later, you aren't a criminal.
Stealing, however, is a crime, which is the fundamental issue here. As far as I know, the iLife apps aren't free, since Apple charges you 50 bucks for a copy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
And if he never installs it how can he read the license? So it doesn't apply to him until he reads and agrees to it. Sorta like the contract isn't usable in a court of law until someone slaps their John Hancock on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Utah, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by saru boy:
Violating a license agreement is not necessarily a crime. It's just a violation of an agreement. You can enter into an agreement not to eat turkey sandwiches...and just because you eat one later, you aren't a criminal.
Stealing, however, is a crime, which is the fundamental issue here. As far as I know, the iLife apps aren't free, since Apple charges you 50 bucks for a copy.
Giving a copy of any software to anyone is a violation of FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS AND IS A FEDERAL CRIME. You can only make a copy of software for you OWN personal use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Utah, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by King Bob On The Cob:
And if he never installs it how can he read the license? So it doesn't apply to him until he reads and agrees to it. Sorta like the contract isn't usable in a court of law until someone slaps their John Hancock on it.
Hummm. You make a good point. However, if he gives a copy of the "installer" to someone else then he is not in violation of the law. However, he can then NEVER install it on his own computer because he had already given a copy to someone else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Utah, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by [APi]TheMan:
Unintelligent? I think not. I think that you, skyman, can do nothing about what mitchell is proposing.
MacGameFiles.com offers a service such as mitchell's, probably somewhat more lawful than mitchell's method, but the idea is the same.
I'm with what Hozie said:
Therefore, skyman, instead of running into this thread like a man that's gone postal and shooting at everyone, drop your gun and evaluate the situation. This thread was about mitchell trying to be courteous to fellow mac users that are not as fortunate to have broadband internet. You stated your opinion once, and now you and I have just begun to pollute the thread. Arg.
Sorry for
Truce?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by King Bob On The Cob:
And if he never installs it how can he read the license? So it doesn't apply to him until he reads and agrees to it. Sorta like the contract isn't usable in a court of law until someone slaps their John Hancock on it.
You can read the license without installing it.
Run the Installer. When the license appears, read it. Then hit Disagree, and the Installer quits.
Yes, re-distributing the iApps is a "bad idea". Try going into an Apple Store and asking for a burned copy of 10.2.[1/2/3], they won't do it. I've tried. Apple wants to keep track of how many copies of their software is going out, and when someone like the creator of this thread goes and downloads the iApps, then distributes it to 20 people, Apple's numbers are then thrown off.
Apple Stores will, however, willingly help you bring your machine into the store, connect it to the 'Net, and let you download it from inside the store.
Point is: You must aquire the new iApps (or an OS download, or Safari) from downloading it from Apple. They ask you not to distribute it, so please, don't distribute it....
...ESPECIALLY WHEN ASKING FOR MONEY! No matter WHERE it goes, you're pretty much saying "You're not getting these unless you give me money".
Mods: Can we lock this thread?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The end of a catwalk with no way out but down.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by iamnotmad:
Yowie - EXTRA illegal?!? Is that a technical term? Is it kind of like extra dead?
Or an extra obvious joke
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cambridge
Status:
Offline
|
|
What if he downloads as many copies of the software as he is going to distribute and then burns each one uniquely onto each CD? Technically, he is never running that installer, so he isn't violating the license agreement. He agreed to the license on his installer, not theirs. I realize it's a little ridiculous, but it sounds like a loophole.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chico, CA and Carlsbad, CA.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by skyman:
Sorry for
Truce?
Good call, man.
|
"In Nomine Patris, Et Fili, Et Spiritus Sancti"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oxford, England
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you don't run the installer your not reading the agreement and you won't have to agree with it.
Of course, that doesn't mean its either legal or illegal to burn it to CD and give it away, but you won't know because you haven't read the agreement. Some free apps are allowed to be freely distributed, how do you know that iMovie etc. isn't without reading the agreement?
Just plead ignorance if they ask
If I only had narrowband, I take you up on your offer. I don't see anything wrong with distributing free apps...
|
Luke
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
WOW I didn't think I would spur such controversy...
If Apple� required me to agree to something prior to downloading the installer, then I would understand that I'm not at liberty to distribute the application without charge.
All Apple would have to do is place a license before the download screen and they would have me, but I think that this is a viable opportunity.
Regardless, nobody has requested a copy...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Madison, WI
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mitchell_pgh:
WOW I didn't think I would spur such controversy...
If Apple� required...
hehehehehehehhehe.
I think its a great jesture, but I also don't know the legality, though it would make me wonder since apple selling almost the exact same CD .
-Owl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Pit Slab #35
Status:
Offline
|
|
A link to this appears on every page of Apple's site.
Software Piracy
Software piracy (the illegal copying of software programs) is a worldwide problem--more than $11 billion is lost to piracy every year! Because software is valuable, and it is easy to create an exact copy of a program from a single computer, software piracy is widespread.
The illegal copying of software programs is a crime! In the United States and many other countries, copyright law provides for severe civil and criminal penalties for the unauthorized reproduction or distribution of copyrighted material. Copyrighted material includes, but is not limited to, computer programs and accompanying sounds, images and text. Under U.S. law, infringement may result in civil damages of up to $150,000 and/or criminal penalties of up to five years imprisonment and/or a $250,000 fine.
Please join Apple in its piracy prevention efforts. You can report incidents of software piracy from this site at Report Piracy. Also, you can help your business avoid serious problems with sound software asset management practices as explained in the section below.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at [email protected].
|
I tried to sig-spam the forums.
ADVANTAGE Motorsports Marketing, Inc. • speedXdesign, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: London
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by skyman:
You can only make copies for your personal use. Giving them away to other people (even for free) is 100% illegal. Also, receiving them is a crime as well.
That depends in Scotland in the UK it LEGAL to giveaway software as long as you don't profit.
But when you install it yourself you have to abide by the install rules so...
Giving people copies is not wrong AS LONG as everybody obides by the install licence.
O BTW this will not apply outside of Scotland as everyone has different rules.
Cheers Edwin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pittsburgh
Status:
Offline
|
|
All of apple's software is copyrighted, excluding the open source stuff. However, you would probably only incure punative damages if sued.
Its not enough for intellectual property to be free in order for you to distribute it as you wish. Distribution is also governed by copyright laws. Even if something is free from the owner, the owner is legally empowered to restrict distribution as they see fit.
(morality of such laws is another discussion entirely)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
My God, with some of the overblown rhetoric I've seen on this list, who needs the likes of the MPAA, RIAA, or MS ranting about criminals? We have a group of reserve beat cops right here, thinking if they yell "COPYRIGHT" or "CRIME" or "ILLEGAL" loud enough they'll finally impress the big boys and get their gun.
The license everyone is flashing around is the same one they use on all Apple software -- you know, the stuff you pay for. It also happens to be the same license we all saw when we upgraded to Mac OS X 10.1 -- the same update that everyone from the local CompUSA rep to the local Mac reseller was burning furiously to prevent a riot of Mac fans waiting in line for their update from Mac OS X Public Beta 2. Now maybe after 14 months the Apple lawyers are finally ready to direct the police to arrest the thousands of "criminals" who violated the license when they ripped the update. Then again, maybe the lawyers at Apple won't. Maybe they evaluate situations and decide the appropriate reaction despite the fact they drew up a license that makes it illegal to distribute copies of their software. You know, kind of like the cop that doesn't go chasing you down the highway because you're breaking the law driving 5 MPH over the speed limit.
Sheesh.
(
Last edited by The Evener; Jan 22, 2003 at 02:39 AM.
)
|
"Psssst..."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Pit Slab #35
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by The Evener:
My God, with some of the overblown rhetoric I've seen on this list, who needs the likes of the MPAA, RIAA, or MS ranting about criminals? We have a group of reserve beat cops right here, thinking if they yell "COPYRIGHT" or "CRIME" or "ILLEGAL" loud enough they'll finally impress the big boys and get their gun.
The license everyone is flashing around is the same one they use on all Apple software -- you know, the stuff you pay for. It also happens to be the same license we all saw when we upgraded to Mac OS X 10.1 -- the same update that everyone from the local CompUSA rep to the local Mac reseller was burning furiously to prevent a riot of Mac fans waiting in line for their update from Mac OS X Public Beta 2. Now maybe after 14 months the Apple lawyers are finally ready to direct the police to arrest the thousands of "criminals" who violated the license when they ripped the update. Then again, maybe the lawyers at Apple won't. Maybe they evaluate situations and decide the appropriate reaction despite the fact they drew up a license that makes it illegal to distribute copies of their software. You know, kind of like the cop that doesn't go chasing you down the highway because you're breaking the law driving 5 MPH over the speed limit.
Sheesh.
They chase us down in rural Minnesota for just that. It's how they fund the State Patrol out here.
Anyways, if he charges, I am almost certain he'll get a letter from Apple Legal.
Just trying to be helpful.
|
I tried to sig-spam the forums.
ADVANTAGE Motorsports Marketing, Inc. • speedXdesign, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pittsburgh
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by The Evener:
My God, with some of the overblown rhetoric I've seen on this list, who needs the likes of the MPAA, RIAA, or MS ranting about criminals? We have a group of reserve beat cops right here, thinking if they yell "COPYRIGHT" or "CRIME" or "ILLEGAL" loud enough they'll finally impress the big boys and get their gun.
Actually, this is one of the least rhetoric filled discussions i've ever seen on the topic of copyrights. The posts have been remarkably limited to the discussion of legality. Some of us equate legality with morality, some of us do not... but that's a topic for another thread in a different forum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: The Tollbooth Capital of the US
Status:
Offline
|
|
Even easier than Dowloading would be to go to your local CompUSA or Apple store and just buying a copy. I mean come on people, If you are not able to download it just go out and buy it. 50 bucks for all 4 is worth it to me. Considering it saves me time from downloading it everytime I need to re-install.
PLus buying it helps Apple with Dev costs and hopefully they will bring us more cool products and updates to our beloved iApps. iTunes for example.
|
"Evil is Powerless If the Good are Unafraid." -Ronald Reagan
Apple and Intel, the dawning of a NEW era.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winnipeg
Status:
Offline
|
|
hmmmm I guess the box probably does have some copyright info on it... but uhh I think that this would only be technically ilegal... I don't see apple legal comming after him for something so tiny and really it's what they do anyway it's just in another forum...
What might acctualliy be better would be downloading them from apple.com and then burnning then I don't think you'd come into any conflict then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Utah, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by The Evener:
My God, with some of the overblown rhetoric I've seen on this list, who needs the likes of the MPAA, RIAA, or MS ranting about criminals? We have a group of reserve beat cops right here, thinking if they yell "COPYRIGHT" or "CRIME" or "ILLEGAL" loud enough they'll finally impress the big boys and get their gun.
The license everyone is flashing around is the same one they use on all Apple software -- you know, the stuff you pay for. It also happens to be the same license we all saw when we upgraded to Mac OS X 10.1 -- the same update that everyone from the local CompUSA rep to the local Mac reseller was burning furiously to prevent a riot of Mac fans waiting in line for their update from Mac OS X Public Beta 2. Now maybe after 14 months the Apple lawyers are finally ready to direct the police to arrest the thousands of "criminals" who violated the license when they ripped the update. Then again, maybe the lawyers at Apple won't. Maybe they evaluate situations and decide the appropriate reaction despite the fact they drew up a license that makes it illegal to distribute copies of their software. You know, kind of like the cop that doesn't go chasing you down the highway because you're breaking the law driving 5 MPH over the speed limit.
Sheesh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Connecticut
Status:
Offline
|
|
iMovie 3 is 80 megs. iPhoto 2 is ~45 megs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest Ohio
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by typoon:
Even easier than Dowloading would be to go to your local CompUSA or Apple store and just buying a copy. I mean come on people, If you are not able to download it just go out and buy it. 50 bucks for all 4 is worth it to me. Considering it saves me time from downloading it everytime I need to re-install.
PLus buying it helps Apple with Dev costs and hopefully they will bring us more cool products and updates to our beloved iApps. iTunes for example.
Um... what if you don't have a SuperDrive?? iDVD would be useless, and the other three iApps (iPhoto, iTunes, and iMovie) would still be available for FREE download online...
Oh yes... haven't you heard of archiving software installers after you've downloaded them? I've set aside a small (700 MB) partition for software installers that I download from the 'net. (Digital River wants me to pay $4.95 for their electronic backup feature??? Heck, I can do it myself). Once the partition is full I burn it to CD. Saves me from having to re-download the installer if I need to reinstall.
(That said, I plan on purchasing iLife, as I have a SuperDrive and can use iDVD 3... even though I will be downloading iPhoto 2 and iMovie 3 the day they're released online).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by skyman:
People who use only the rolleyes when replying should automaticly be banned from this board. And while we're at it, let's ban all animated smileys. Especially that $"#$" poking-stick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BFE
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think distributing it is also illegal. Of course, so is speeding.
Tell me, who are you hurting when you distribute a freely downloadable app on cd?
What if you sell them this way: For Sale, Used Cd-Rs, bits and bytes may resemble freely downloadble software applciations from Apple. Any resenblence to them is entirely coincidental.
Arguing what is illegal is one thing. Arguing if it is "morally wrong" is another. Arguing if it is "stealing" is another.
Apple stopped MacAddict from distributing its free updates on its CDs back in 97-98. Apple claimed it "owned" the software and therefore could control its distribution. They complied (as I would have). Now with DSL and cable modems, free updates are no big deal, even 100MB.
So I suggest the modem people either buy it (best bet) or download during the wee-hours.
Or just copy it from a friend and be done with it.
|
I'm a bird. I am the 1% (of pets).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: In my tree making cookies
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Eriamjh:
I think distributing it is also illegal. Of course, so is speeding.
Tell me, who are you hurting when you distribute a freely downloadable app on cd?
What if you sell them this way: For Sale, Used Cd-Rs, bits and bytes may resemble freely downloadble software applciations from Apple. Any resenblence to them is entirely coincidental.
Arguing what is illegal is one thing. Arguing if it is "morally wrong" is another. Arguing if it is "stealing" is another.
Apple stopped MacAddict from distributing its free updates on its CDs back in 97-98. Apple claimed it "owned" the software and therefore could control its distribution. They complied (as I would have). Now with DSL and cable modems, free updates are no big deal, even 100MB.
So I suggest the modem people either buy it (best bet) or download during the wee-hours.
Or just copy it from a friend and be done with it.
Who's hurt? How about all of these idiots here offering pirated software in a logged public forum? Seriously...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pittsburgh
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by dfiler:
Actually, this is one of the least rhetoric filled discussions i've ever seen on the topic of copyrights. The posts have been remarkably limited to the discussion of legality. Some of us equate legality with morality, some of us do not... but that's a topic for another thread in a different forum.
I official retract this statement.
Resume your regularly scheduled bickering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|