 |
 |
MS up to old tricks--no QT in IE upgrade
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Reading, PA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Here's the story from CNET
|
|
And that's true too.--Shakespeare, King Lear
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
So why does Apple have to fix this? It seems to me that it was Microsloth's update that broke compatibility. How is it Apple's problem if when trying to fix security problems with IE M$ made the QuickTime plugin not work?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sad King Billy's Monument on Hyperion
Status:
Offline
|
|
Isn't it funny how C|net tries to turn this into Apple's problem? Gee, let's think about this for a moment: MICROSOFT changes their browser, and suddenly it's APPLE's fault that QuickTime doesn't work? Way to show everyone who's got the brains, she|pet.
|
|
I abused my signature until she cried.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Manchester,UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ahhh! But mabe this is just the kick Apple neads to stop QT on the PC sucking so spectacularly.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Rockies
Status:
Offline
|
|
Funny also that the article doesn't mention the anti-trust case. This is not good timing for MS. This is exactly the type of thing that will go into briefs and raise judge's eyebrows.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top