|
|
L3 Cache
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Do the intel core duos in the the macbooks have an L3 cache?
|
PB12 / 1.5 / 80 / 1.25 / SD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Northern VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
iMac 24" | Core 2 Extreme 2.8GHz | 4GB RAM | 500GB HD
PowerBook G4 15" HR | 1.67GHz | 2GB RAM | 100GB HD
R.I.P 1995 Toyota Supra NA-T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
what about the macbook pro? i remember the 15 and 17 inch powerbook had L3.
|
PB12 / 1.5 / 80 / 1.25 / SD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Processor and Memory
* 15-inch MacBook Pro:
o Intel 2.0 or 2.16GHz Intel Core Duo processor, 2MB on chip shared L2 cache running 1:1 with processor speed
o 512MB (single SODIMM) of PC2-5300 (667MHz) DDR2 memory on 2.0GHz configuration; and 1GB (single SODIMM) on 2.16GHz configuration; two SODIMM slots support up to 2GB
o 667MHz frontside bus
* 17-inch MacBook Pro:
o 2.16GHz Intel Core Duo processor, 2MB on chip shared L2 cache running 1:1 with processor speed
o 1GB (single SODIMM) of PC2-5300 (667MHz) DDR2 memory
o 667MHz frontside bus
I don't see L3 so I'll go with a no
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
The Intel chips have as much L2 (faster) cache as the G4s ever had L3 (slower).
Chips coming in August will double that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Northern VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by warra
i remember the 15 and 17 inch powerbook had L3.
Only titanium Powerbook had 1MB L3 cache.
|
iMac 24" | Core 2 Extreme 2.8GHz | 4GB RAM | 500GB HD
PowerBook G4 15" HR | 1.67GHz | 2GB RAM | 100GB HD
R.I.P 1995 Toyota Supra NA-T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
so an older powerpc processor had an L3 cache? whats the deal?
|
PB12 / 1.5 / 80 / 1.25 / SD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Somewhere
Status:
Offline
|
|
As mduell already mentioned, L3 cache is slower than L2 cache, and significantly so. The older PowerPC chips had small amounts of L2 cache, and the large L3 cache to compensate. The newer chips now have a large L2 cache, so the L3 cache isn't as necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Not far from a shop that sells Logic Pro
Status:
Offline
|
|
An L3 cache would cripple a modern highspeed CPU like the Core duo... the PPC needed it because the bus was so sloooooooooow... Remember the L2 is on the CPU die and so VERY fast... the PPC's L3 was external to the CPU and actually MUCH MUCH slower than the DDR2 ram in current MBPs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Somewhere
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Velocity211
Only titanium Powerbook had 1MB L3 cache.
As well as the first generation 17" 1Ghz PowerBook. Rev B of this machine began with 512 L2 cache and no L3.
|
iMac 24" 2.8 Ghz Core 2 Extreme
500GB HDD
4GB Ram
Proud new Owner!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|