Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Political/War Lounge > Is the NYT really as liberal as it's made out to be?

Is the NYT really as liberal as it's made out to be? (Page 2)
Thread Tools
Thorzdad
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Nobletucky
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 6, 2018, 10:30 AM
 
It's a story in the Fresno Bee about events in Fresno aimed at an area Congressman. Sounds like local coverage to me. Just because you can access it anywhere doesn't make it "national, headline news."
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 6, 2018, 11:02 AM
 
If this is a reply to my comment, that’s the point.

The Fresno Bee reports what matters to locals, the NYT reports national news. The difference in coverage between them is due to that, not their respective political slants.
     
The Final Dakar  (op)
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 6, 2018, 03:56 PM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
Protesters say ‘Nunes must go’ after release of controversial memo | The Fresno Bee

Several dozen people in Fresno on Saturday called for Rep. Devin Nunes to step down as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.”

I posit this isn’t national, headline news.
I agree but neither was the NYTs. That's another part of why the headline is irritating.

Edit: By saying Nunes constituents don't care about the memo they imply the memo must not be that controversial or important
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 6, 2018, 04:18 PM
 
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar View Post
I agree but neither was the NYTs. That's another part of why the headline is irritating.

Edit: By saying Nunes constituents don't care about the memo they imply the memo must not be that controversial or important
Okay... I can see that beef, but I read it differently.

This is a story about Nunes’ district. The only way that matters in a national context vis-a-vis the memo is whether his constituents will axe him over it.

I’m guessing there’s no indication they will, and that’s what the Times is reporting.


Defending the Times makes me feel dirty.
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 6, 2018, 04:27 PM
 
To put it another way, I think the subtext of the headline is the exact opposite of claiming the memo is unimportant. The memo being important is a given. This can be ascertained by all the column inches the Times is devoting to it. In that framework, the subtext of the headline is more like “don’t expect this to change these idiots’ minds”.
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 6, 2018, 06:53 PM
 
To put it another another way, now that I reread your post and understand it better, how his district will respond to his shenanigans at the polls is national news.
     
The Final Dakar  (op)
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 6, 2018, 09:35 PM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
Okay... I can see that beef, but I read it differently.

This is a story about Nunes’ district. The only way that matters in a national context vis-a-vis the memo is whether his constituents will axe him over it.

I’m guessing there’s no indication they will, and that’s what the Times is reporting.


Defending the Times makes me feel dirty.
Originally Posted by subego View Post
To put it another another way, now that I reread your post and understand it better, how his district will respond to his shenanigans at the polls is national news.
That just makes this story more pointless. Maybe if they bothered to poll the district to put it into the spotlight it might have been worthwhile.
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 7, 2018, 01:47 PM
 
Sure it’s pointless. I read it and it’s pretty fluffy, but the question is if it’s slanted.

FWIW, they seem sensitive to your criticism and redid the headline to put more weight on the memo’s importance.

New headline is “Washington Is Abuzz Over the Nunes Memo. His California District, Not So Much”.
     
The Final Dakar  (op)
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 13, 2018, 09:29 PM
 
For the pro-active and morbidly curious, google Quinn Norton and bask in the warm glow.
     
The Final Dakar  (op)
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 13, 2018, 11:50 PM
 
"Investigating Quinn Norton, NYTimes Sees No Clear Link To Neo-Nazis."
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 14, 2018, 05:34 AM
 
Norton is awesome, and I’m too ****ing pissed off about this to write constructively.
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 14, 2018, 02:25 PM
 
**** you New York Times. Norton has more integrity in her ****ing fingernail than you have in your entire newsroom.

Context is dead, and you helped kill it you spineless pieces of shit.
     
The Final Dakar  (op)
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 15, 2018, 11:59 PM
 
Was her being friendly with neo-nazis out of context?
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2018, 12:13 PM
 
Have you ever noticed the blueprint for every neo-Nazi who disavows their Nazism is the same?

“It wasn’t until [unexpected person] reached out to me that I was able to realize how wrong I was.”

Every single one of these examples required someone being friendly to a neo-Nazi.

This is the context of her friendship, and it’s obvious to anyone even glancingly familiar with her turbo-progressive politics. The proposition her friendship implies sympathy to Nazism on her part is ignorant.
     
The Final Dakar  (op)
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 19, 2018, 12:18 AM
 
How do I put this... In a different time this could be tolerable. In 2017, it's not. And that's without getting into the merits of your analysis.

My question is, is the NYT incompetent or indifferent? How does a national news organization, particularly one who has some shitty social media rules, not to a once over on her twitter account?
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 19, 2018, 12:35 AM
 
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar View Post
How do I put this... In a different time this could be tolerable. In 2017, it's not. And that's without getting into the merits of your analysis.
The moment reaching out to people with compassion is intolerable, [current year] can go **** itself.
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 19, 2018, 02:40 PM
 
To answer your other question, I’m sure they did, but she has over 80,000 tweets.

Likewise, in their perusal of those tweets, what would drive them to search for evidence of her being something she’s not?
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 19, 2018, 03:38 PM
 
FWIW, I’ve calmed down, but only a bit.

The reason I’m losing my shit is Norton is a force for good in this world, and I mean that in a social justice sense.

She’s also not guilty of anything.

An innocent person getting punished disturbs me. Social justice losing a voice in the paper of record disturbs me. That this was perpetrated in the name of social justice disturbs me.

To get inside my mindset, imagine if Franken or Louis C.K. were innocent of all charges, yet suffered their same respective downfalls.
     
The Final Dakar  (op)
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 19, 2018, 08:59 PM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
The moment reaching out to people with compassion is intolerable, [current year] can go **** itself.
It's not reaching out, though. Reaching it out is a one time thing. This a friendship. It is a continuing relationship in the face of unchanging views.


Originally Posted by subego View Post
To answer your other question, I’m sure they did, but she has over 80,000 tweets.

Likewise, in their perusal of those tweets, what would drive them to search for evidence of her being something she’s not?
Control-F "******"

You found 10 tweets


"We do this for everyone."
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 20, 2018, 02:30 PM
 
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar View Post
Reaching it out is a one time thing.
If this policy has been successful for you when it comes to repairing massively damaged people, consider yourself inordinately lucky.
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 20, 2018, 03:04 PM
 
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar View Post
Control-F "******"

You found 10 tweets


"We do this for everyone."
Maybe I don’t pay enough attention to the NYT. Have they had this problem before?

If they haven’t, the question being asked is “why didn’t they have hindsight”, which is in firmly in the realm of self-answering as questions go.
     
The Final Dakar  (op)
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 20, 2018, 11:52 PM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
If this policy has been successful for you when it comes to repairing massively damaged people, consider yourself inordinately lucky.
Fine, it's a semantic argument.

Do you have many examples of this working?


Originally Posted by subego View Post
Maybe I don’t pay enough attention to the NYT. Have they had this problem before?

If they haven’t, the question being asked is “why didn’t they have hindsight”, which is in firmly in the realm of self-answering as questions go.
Oh I'm not implying they do. But I'd be surprised if they didn't. People are constantly getting hosed by their own words the past few years.
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Yesterday, 04:25 PM
 
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar View Post
Fine, it's a semantic argument.

Do you have many examples of this working?
As I said, every feel-good story of a Nazi/KKK type flipping.

Or is this not what’s being asked?
     
Laminar
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Yesterday, 04:48 PM
 
Like this guy, I assume?
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Yesterday, 06:25 PM
 
That fits the bill. This is what came to mind for me.
     
The Final Dakar  (op)
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Yesterday, 06:55 PM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
every feel-good story of a Nazi/KKK type flipping.
Yeah, what are they? I can think of one. You make it sound like they are numerous, so a few examples would be nice.

Originally Posted by Laminar View Post
Like this guy, I assume?
I had forgotten about this guy.

Originally Posted by subego View Post
That fits the bill. This is what came to mind for me.
Yes, this is the example I was thinking of. I don't think it's common though.

I'd like to highlight, however, that both stories involve the very people they're think are inferior having a dialog with them. I think this is key.
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Yesterday, 10:32 PM
 
What is the conclusion I am meant to be drawing?

For what argument am I asking to provide evidence against?

If it’s that she’s a Nazi sympathizer, I provide her entire body of work as counter-evidence.
     
Laminar
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Today, 04:09 PM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
That fits the bill. This is what came to mind for me.
Modern "progressivism" isn't liberal, though, and our liberal arts colleges are now little more than Marxist recruiting centers.
Holy shit I don't miss CPT.
     
 
Thread Tools
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,