Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Getting Serious About Bicycling-Have Some Questions

Getting Serious About Bicycling-Have Some Questions
Thread Tools
ghporter
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2008, 09:58 PM
 
Considering that it's pretty much impossible for someone of my height to be able to efficiently use a bicycle that you can get from a sporting goods store (Huffy, Murray, etc.), and that my favorite exercise activity is cycling, I've decided to get serious about it, including getting a serious bike. I'm looking at some sort of cross-trail bike from Specialized, not sure which one.

I already understand the need for a real helmet (those sporting goods store helmets from Bike scare me!), decent gloves, and even the padded shorts. But I've never had anyone explain how they wear the shorts-are they specific to a particular kind of undergarment, or do you just not bother? I'm looking at gel-padded gloves, because I'm pretty big and I'll need to control the pressure on my hands-is there some kind of glove that is "best" for a relatively top-heavy (think football player) build kind of guy?

I can do about 8 miles on my Murray off-road bike (using it on the street, mostly) in one run, and by the end of next month I plan on doubling that. Any training advice? What sorts of intervals, combination of flat and hill (I've got plenty of hills around here!), distance drills, etc. work best to go from "can pedal slowly for a long time" to "can pedal pretty fast for a long time"?

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2008, 11:00 PM
 
Originally Posted by ghporter View Post
are they specific to a particular kind of undergarment, or do you just not bother

Undergarments in bike shorts is a serious no-no.

You go commando or not at all.

Edit: Oh, FWIW, I always imagined you as a more short, slim jet-fighter pilot type than a top-heavy football player type.
( Last edited by subego; Apr 20, 2008 at 11:12 PM. )
     
keekeeree
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Moved from Ohio's first capital to its current capital
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2008, 11:22 PM
 
Originally Posted by ghporter View Post
I'm looking at gel-padded gloves, because I'm pretty big and I'll need to control the pressure on my hands-is there some kind of glove that is "best" for a relatively top-heavy (think football player) build kind of guy?
Gel works pretty good. It allows the padding to be efficient without being too thick. If the padding is too thick, it can be almost as bad as too thin since it can interfere with circulation in the hand.

I can do about 8 miles on my Murray off-road bike (using it on the street, mostly) in one run, and by the end of next month I plan on doubling that.
Simply getting a real bike will probably be enough to get you to this level. It'll be lighter and should be the proper size and adjusted to your fit making you much more efficient.

Any training advice? What sorts of intervals, combination of flat and hill (I've got plenty of hills around here!), distance drills, etc. work best to go from "can pedal slowly for a long time" to "can pedal pretty fast for a long time"?
For a beginning cyclist, I'd recommend the following: in the beginning, the exact intervals or drills aren't as important as you having fun. If you find a good course that offers a variety of terrain and little traffic that you really enjoy riding, you'll be more likely to ride regularly and the getting-in-shape part will happen naturally. Once you have a good base of fitness, then you can explore intervals and drills.

Two pieces of equipment that I'd recommend:
  1. a computer for your bike that measures your cadence (revolutions per minute of your pedals)
    - Practice using your gears to find the right resistance level while being able to maintain a cadence of 85 or 90.
  2. a heart-rate monitor.
    - if you're serious about getting in shape, this will allow you to be certain that your heart rate is at a level that you'll see benefits without over stressing your heart.
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2008, 11:31 PM
 
Originally Posted by keekeeree View Post
Four syllables, sounds like "chilly coffee".

Chillicothe? In Illinois?
     
vmarks
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Up In The Air
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2008, 11:40 PM
 
Specialized, Cannondale, Klein, Trek, and others all make fine cross-trail bikes.

Consider the material you want, and the fit, more than the brand.

Consider buying a new-old-stock bike for considerable savings. Bike dealers need to make space for new stuff.

Suspension can add some comfort, but it also adds weight. Depending on the design of the rear suspension, you can bio-pace, where the suspension moves with your pedaling, meaning you aren't expending energy efficiently (like, moving forward.)
     
Lateralus
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 12:08 AM
 
I'm 6'6, so I feel your pain Glenn.

I've been cycling for years. And my steed is a Giant Sedona. Love the little beast.

Actually, I hesitate to even call myself a cyclist. As far as stamina, I have no doubt that I qualify. But as far as equipment... FAIL.

I don't read any cycling material. I don't know any cyclists. I don't have any understanding of regiments or workouts. I don't wear a helmet, special shoes, gloves, have any monitoring equipment, nor do I wear any special clothing. I just throw on a t-shirt and a pair of cargo pants and pedal off for 30 mile runs.

The heart monitor mention has me thinking though. If it is possible to strain your heart, I have no doubt that I've probably done it. I've spent more than my fair share of time on my living room floor trying to recover from sharp pains and funky beats after a stint on the bike.

Something to look into maybe...
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
     
brassplayersrock²
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 12:11 AM
 
this might be a good read for those in need of information.

CYCLING PERFORMANCE TIPS - heart rate monitor
     
tomato71
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Mar 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 12:22 AM
 
Originally Posted by ghporter View Post
But I've never had anyone explain how they wear the shorts-are they specific to a particular kind of undergarment, or do you just not bother?
You don't wear underwear with cycling shorts. The point of padded shorts is not so much to provide a cushion but to wick moisture away from your bum. Underwear, especially cotton underwear, tends to hold moisture and as it dries it becomes stiff and rough, causing that ultimate cycling bane, chaffing.

Originally Posted by ghporter View Post
I'm looking at gel-padded gloves, because I'm pretty big and I'll need to control the pressure on my hands-is there some kind of glove that is "best" for a relatively top-heavy (think football player) build kind of guy?
Gel padded gloves will help, but not as much as shifting your hand position over the course of a long ride. This is in some part why road cyclists use drop handlebars -- because you have lots of places to put your hands: on the top of the bars, on the hoods of the shifters, 'in the drops' etc.

You should really join the forum over here: RoadBikeReview Forums - Powered by vBulletin
     
mduell
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 12:33 AM
 
For gloves I like my PI Gel Lites.

Padded shorts are supposed to be worn without undergarmets, but it's not really a problem to put boxers under them for short rides. I wear lightweight cargo shorts over them just so I'm not "that guy."

Don't waste your money on a cyclecomputer. A watch or phone and gmaps-pedometer is all you need. You can feel cadence just fine.

For speed, do short (20-30 min) fast rides on flats or moderate hills (sit your butt down!). My current tempo is 7.mumble miles of flats in 25 minutes (3.5 minute mile) and I'm trying to build that to 10 miles (2.5 minute mile) as an end goal.
     
Yose
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 12:59 AM
 
The best decision I made in the last few years was to never again buy another pair of cycling gloves. Checkout your local sailing store and see what sort of gloves they have - I find they are more comfortable and offer better protection (and last longer, I seem to shred gloves from MEC all too quickly). Also it means I have to buy less stuff between sailing and cycling.

Oh, and I'm a big guy too, on long rides I find my hands get num regardless of the kind of glove I'm wearing or the bike I'm using (Roadie or MTB)... I usually try to shake them out every once and a while to get the blood down to my fingers again.
Yose.
Give me ambiguity or give me something else.
     
Don Pickett
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: New York, NY, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 02:15 AM
 
Large echoing what others have said:

1) No undies under the cycling shorts. The main advantage of cycling shorts is actually lack of chafing and not padding. Wearing undies with the shorts defeats that. Additionally, a trick to make your shorts last longer and remain comfy: after a ride (unless you wash them after every ride) let th soak in a sink full of cold water for about 20 minutes. It is the bacteria which grow in sweat which make clothes smell bad and break down fabric. Additionally, wash the shorts in cold water and let them line dry. Never throw them in the dryer.

2) When you get your new bike, have the bike shop do a Fit Kit on you. They will make sure you are positioned properly on the bike, which will make it more comfortable to ride and help ensure you don't develop any RSIs from improper position.

3) As for training, any cycling mag will have a section on training. That's probably the best place to start.
The era of anthropomorphizing hardware is over.
     
OreoCookie
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 03:10 AM
 
Bike
It's hard to get a bike without front suspension these days (save for race bikes, of course). If you don't plan on doing trails and trials (which I think you don't, considering the type of bike you're interested in), rear suspension will only waste your energy and add to the cost and the weight of the bike.

Equipment
(i) Helmet. Don't save on this one. Get a new one after each fall (there is a 50 % discount if you send in your old helmet).
(ii) Gloves. I got some nasty scars, because I didn't wear any at one point. Plus, it's more comfortable. I don't have gel-padded gloves, the cushion on mine consists of rubber mesh (= better air flow).
(iii) A bike computer.
(iv) In my experience wearing (tight) underwear is just fine. I use tight boxers, not the tighty wihities my grandfather has. Plus, I find cycling shorts equally comfortable with non-padded regular shorts. In my book, this one is optional.
(v) A bubble for water. This one is only crucial if you do longer tours (2+ hours), otherwise a bottle of water is fine.
( Last edited by OreoCookie; Apr 21, 2008 at 07:53 AM. )
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
dingster1
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 07:30 AM
 
Another suggestion- bikeforums.net.
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 08:14 AM
 
Agree with most of the above. I'm totally out of shape nowadays, but I used to bike a lot... If you are going off road in terrain that's the least bit technical, I'd get an off-road bike, keep a separate beater bike for the roads. Or you can get a separate pair of wheels for the off-road bike. I did that for many years. (Actually, what I have now is a dedicated mountain bike and a dedicated road bike, but I realize that is too expensive.)

It's basically impossible to get an off-road bike without a front suspension these days, but that's because it's so useful to have. Rear suspension is something I'd avoid, unless you have tons of money, and even then, I'd consider avoiding it. It robs you of power, and adds weight, especially if you're at the lower end of the market.

Do NOT buy the bike online. Get fit at the store. Even then you may have problems getting dialed in.

Get clipless pedals. It makes a huge difference in your riding style and in power transfer, both for off-road and on-road biking. However, clipless pedals make it that much harder to fit the bike.

A bike computer is very helpful. They're relatively inexpensive too if you install it yourself. You can monitor stuff like max speed and average speed, but what is much more useful for me is pedals per minute (cadence). My friend does best at around 80/min, whereas I'm more efficient at 90, even when climbing up hill (sitting down). I also got a heart-rate monitor. It's a bit of a pain sometimes because the sensor may slip, but if it is worn correctly, it can be very useful. I remember when I went on my very first 100 km ride (just about killed me), I went with a couple of hard-core guys who ended up waiting for me all the time. So I kept on speeding up to catch up, and then got fatigued and had to slow back down. Using the heart rate monitor I noticed it was because my heart rate was going well above 170. So, I went back to 160 or less and I could keep a constant pace, even if it wasn't a super fast pace.

P.S. For me, even if I'm just going 45 mins, water alone isn't enough for me. I need to use some source of energy/electrolytes. What I usually do is use diluted Gatorade half-half with water.
     
ghporter  (op)
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 09:25 AM
 
Thanks for the info, folks. I am definitely getting my bike fitted; the store I'm looking at is very much set up for fitting the bike to the rider, and hopefully we'll be getting an appointment this afternoon to have that fitting done. I'm looking at a hard tail bike, and the line I'm looking at seems to all have locking front suspensions, so street/speed work will be more efficient.

In all the years I've been riding with a helmet I haven't had a single spill-though as a kid I was very good at falling and getting myself thrown. But I have recently had an opportunity to spend some time with a few young men who had suffered head injuries from auto accidents, and my old "never touch the motorcycle without already having your helmet on" training has been thoroughly reinforced; I'm not only getting a good helmet, I'm getting one that's going to be very effective in protecting my noggin.

My current bike shorts are showing some age-they are looking faded, but they are still in great condition-having worn "tidy-whities" under them on some rather strenuous rides, I can say that I never suffered chafing from that practice, but did enjoy the (apparent) extra sweat wicking that cotton afforded. However, I can also say that these shorts don't stay in place as well as I'd like when worn over undies, so as soon as I get my new bike, I'm going to change my practices. It also seems that the mundane saddle I've become accustomed to seeing on cheapie bikes is completely unknown at the serious bike shops around, so proper support for the proper spots on my butt is not going to be a problem, but the thicker, padded spots on those shorts will be helpful too.

The glove thing is something I've spent a lot of time thinking about. I have carpal-tunnel syndrome, or more properly, I have the after effects of CTS. That makes me very aware of nerve impingement and ways to protect myself from causing it. I already move my hands around on the handlebars on a regular basis-mostly whenever I change from one sort of surface to another, or from level to hills. I'm looking at the gloves as an extra level of protection.

A few years ago, when I was regularly riding my Huffy "trail" bike, I'd do 8 miles on the street in about 30 minutes, three times a week. I'm going to be pretty cautious in this, but I hope to get back to that level pretty quickly. Hopefully that will be a lot easier with a "real" bike, even one that's not really optimized for the street. But it gets hot and dry here, so my 50oz Camelback is going with me whenever I hit the street. I've seen a major difference in my physical performance when I'm properly hydrated compared to when I am not, and I'm not interested in stressing myself that way-I'm going out equipped.

I am going to get a minimal bike computer-not the fancy kind that tells you when to stroke, what your thrust vector is and what the Kowloon stock market is doing at the moment, just a speedometer/odometer device-and I have only just become aware of wireless bike computers. WOW! I've installed wired speedos on a long list of bikes in the past, and they've always been a pain because of that stupid wire. Hallelujah!

Oh, and when I get the bike, I'll post all the specifics here. Thanks again!

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 09:37 AM
 
Originally Posted by ghporter View Post
just a speedometer/odometer device
YMMV, but as I said earlier I find the cadence feature equally important to me. And it adds maybe 5-10 bucks to the cost.
     
ghporter  (op)
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 09:42 AM
 
Well the wireless devices I saw are more than minimal speedometer/odometers, I just don't know how much else they do. A cadence function is something I've had to deal with on exercise bikes (used for "fitness testing" in a.... I don't want to go there right now; it wasn't pretty), but I've never used one on the road. If I can get that sort of function then I'll certainly play with it, I'm just not counting that as one of my "must haves."

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
MarkLT1
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: More Cowbell...
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 09:47 AM
 
Another (road) cyclist here, with some opinion for ya.

Many of the decisions you make should be based on what type of cycling you want to do. All road? Get a dedicated road bike. ~75% road, ~25% crushed gravel-type trails? Get a dedicated road bike, with fatter, textured, leak resistant tires (i.e.- specialized All condition Armadillo's). Mostly crushed gravel type riding? Go for a hybrid. Anything more extreme (double track, single track, etc.. ) go for a full on mountain bike. You want to do time trials and/or triathlons, get a tri bike .

When it comes to cycling on the road, you'd be amazed how much more efficient a true road bike is over a hybrid or mountain bike. I mountain biked for years and years, but when I moved to a place that had little good mountain biking terrain, but wonderful areas to road bike, I switched over, and have been having a BLAST since. In fact, my wife and I enjoy road cycling so much, that we are planning on a cycling tour of Scotland this summer- doing 50-70 miles per day, stopping at various castles, etc.. and taking all of our gear in rear-mounted panniers. Once you get the road cycling bug, it is hard to shake!

But back to your questions. As others have mentioned, getting a bike with the proper fit is KEY. Some buying tips:
1) Buy your bike from a local BIKE shop. Not a sporting goods store, not a Ski/patio furniture store that happens to sell bikes (there are many of these), but from a true cycle store that focuses on bikes. You will probably pay slightly more, but they are a) going to have better selection, b) know how to get you into the proper bike, c) usually offer good mechanical services/support for your bike. One thing to take time doing is bike store shopping. Find a place that you are comfortable, and like the people there. See what kind of service they offer along with the bike. I'd cross any shop off the list that doesn't at least offer a free 30-day tune up, as after 30 days, you WILL have to have the bike tuned, as the shift and brake cables tend to stretch as you break the bike in. Build a relationship with the shop- it will make your future purchases/mechanical fixes/etc.. go much smoother.

2) Don't buy the first bike you like, right away. Try out a large assortment of frames/brands. Various bike makers have different opinions on frame geometry. This is why some brands are better for some riders than others. Since you are very tall, this will definitely play a role, as you aren't the "average" biker body. Personally, I have a longer torso than average. Thus, frames by LeMond and Merx tend to fit me very well, as they both use longer top tubes. Something like a Specialized frame will feel cramped, and almost like a time trial bike to me. So get out there, go to good bike shops, and ride everything they have in your size. You can go out and drop $5k on a high end Colonago frame, but if it isn't comfortable, you wont want to ride it. On the other hand, you could spend $400 on a '01 LeMond steel frame (which is heavy but soft) and if it fit you well, would love it. I.E.- fit is KEY.

3) As others have mentioned, after you purchase the bike, do yourself a huge favor and get a professional fitting. They will adjust your seat position, cleats (if you have clipless pedals), handle bars, stem, etc.. This usually runs ~$50 (at least around here) and involves you sitting on your bike, on a trainer for a good 45 minutes to an hour, while they tweak all of the settings on your bike.

4) Seats. Most bikes under about $1200, come with crap seats. Most bikes over $1200 come with the wrong seat for you. Seats are a very personal choice, but can make a WORLD of difference when it comes to longer rides. You really dont want the big, overstuffed, gel padded seats. They just bunch up under your butt, make pedaling difficult, and become uncomfortable to sit on after 30-45 minutes. When you sit down on a bike seat, you will sit on what bikers refer to as your "sit bones". And this is where you will get sore while riding. You want to first find your sit bones (go for an hour long ride, with the stock seat your bike came with, and you'll feel them soon enough). Next, you want to buy a seat that offers good support, and adequate padding, right where your sit bones are, but doesn't have extra padding elsewhere. Many bike seats will allow you to use a bike seat for ~14 days, and be able to return it if it isn't comfortable for you. I went through 6 seats before I found one that works well for me. Now that I have a good seat for my sit bones, being on the bike is MUCH more comfortable.

As for extra gear, I think others covered it pretty well. Padded shorts == good. Underwear under padded shorts == VERY bad. If you are doing slower speed, hybrid/trail biking, you might want to consider mountain biking shorts. They have the padding, but look like a normal short. This lets your bits "breathe" a bit. If, however, you are going the road route, the baggier shorts become a nuisance, as they flap in the wind, slow you down etc.. this is where the tight bike shorts are great. Also, if you are road biking, I always recommend people buy the loudest cycling shirts they can find. People on the road are much more likely to notice bright clothing rather than some dark, plain shirt.

Once you buy all the stuff, you want to do a good training schedule. My suggestion would be this- get a heart rate monitor, and for the first 250-500 miles or so, bike what I refer to as "Guiltily" slow. Try to keep your heart rate under 130 or so (well within your aerobic range, in the prime "fat burning" zone), and just get comfortable on the bike. Try to bike shorter than the distance where you start to feel uncomfortable. The first few weeks you'll probably be having a sore back, etc.. But you'll soon become more comfortable on the bike.

Once you get through these body adjustment miles, then there are countless ways you can go. Pick a goal- do you want to ride some crazy trail? Bike a century? Climb some mountain road near your home? Try to structure training to attain that goal. For example, I am about a week away from being in "comfortable bike shape" after the winter. My wife and I are going to do this Scotland trip in August, and so we set a training goal of doing a fully loaded (30lbs of gear) century (100-mile ride) for the first weekend in July. We are starting to build up miles, get in shape, etc.. Having a goal, weather it be to bike 20 miles, climb a huge hill, or do a 1000km Brevet really helps when it comes to training.

Ok, I've blabbed on enough for now. Just remember- get a bike that fits you, find a comfortable seat, and HAVE FUN!
     
paul w
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vente: Achat
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 10:55 AM
 
Any advice on the HR monitor, computer? Garmin and Polar seem to be two popular brands, but neither offer mac support. Though I did come across some 3rd party solutions.
     
MarkLT1
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: More Cowbell...
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 11:02 AM
 
Originally Posted by paul w View Post
Any advice on the HR monitor, computer? Garmin and Polar seem to be two popular brands, but neither offer mac support. Though I did come across some 3rd party solutions.
If you are just looking for a HR monitor, the Polar's are great. They've been doing heart rate monitors for many years, and have it down pretty well. The only issue I run into is that if you are cycling too close to someone else with a Polar, both watches will pick up the higher heart rate. A good friend of mine who I cycle with regularly, used to be a semi-pro rider (i.e.- he is an amazing cyclist). We'll be cycling at a moderate pace for me (rest pace for him) and he'll comment- "You're working pretty hard huh?" and laugh a bit, as he sees my 140bpm, instead of his 90.

I had an older model Garmin that had a HR monitor, and it was flakey at best. Though this was probably 3-4 years old (it was one of their running watches), so things may have changed.

I tend to keep my HR monitor separate from my bike computer. I have my heart rate watch wrapped around my handle bars, then rubber banded such that it sits up and faces me. Works great, and isn't clunky like their "handle bar" attachment brackets.

As for Mac vs. PC, I dont know, as I only look at my average and peak HR, and use it mostly in real time to alter my effort for training.
     
OreoCookie
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 11:49 AM
 
I'm wondering, how useful is a heart rate monitor really, if you have a decent amount of experience? And is it really useful if you're on a tour during the weekend for instance? Plus, is the sensor comfortable?
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
MarkLT1
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: More Cowbell...
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 12:42 PM
 
Originally Posted by OreoCookie View Post
I'm wondering, how useful is a heart rate monitor really, if you have a decent amount of experience? And is it really useful if you're on a tour during the weekend for instance? Plus, is the sensor comfortable?
I find an HRM to be about the best piece of equipment I have purchased for cycling (and aerobic training in general). One of the issues you run into is that it is difficult (even when experienced) to judge if you are at your aerobic threshold, or in a fat burning zone. The top end of fat burning, and the bottom to middle end of aerobic, both feel like they are about the same amount of exertion, however the effect on your body is quite different. So depending on your goals, you will want to know what zone you are in.

The one easy way to differentiate the zone you are in is with your heart rate. In the beginning of the season, when I am trying to simply burn fat, and get back into descent shape, I use a HRM to put an upper bound on my workout (keep my heart rate under ~130bpm). By staying in this zone, you will actually burn more fat, than by working harder. Later on in the season, when I am doing interval training to up my anaerobic threshold, I'll use a HRM to push my self to various levels in my anaerobic range. I might do 4 or 5 intervals that build to a maximum heart rate push. By going anaerobic, you build lactic acid in your muscles, which hurts like a #$^#$. But doing intervals like this does 2 things- first it adapts your body to flushing lactic acid, so you can recover faster, and second it pushes up the amount of physical exertion that is required to build up lactic acid.

Yes, it is true that you can approximate much of this without a heart rate monitor by relying on what things "feel" like, but with an HRM, you can be much more efficient in your workout.

As for the sensor, it is perfectly comfortable. I have never had any discomfort from it, and 2-3 minutes after I put it on, I forget that it is even there.

Like any other tool, a HRM is useless if you don't know how to use it, but with some education, it is a great piece of equipment.
     
keekeeree
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Moved from Ohio's first capital to its current capital
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 01:34 PM
 
Just a note about wireless bike computers: be careful with them around your laptops/strong wifi signals. My wife has wireless computer for her bike, and after a ride she has to make sure she keeps it away from my iBook (I keep a spreadsheet to track my training) because it causes her bike computer to freak out.

Originally Posted by subego View Post
Chillicothe? In Illinois?
Right town, wrong state. Ohio.
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 02:12 PM
 
Knowing your heart rate helps a lot in many situations. For constant aerobic exercize it's amazing how much heart rate can vary with you not really knowing it. For amateurs like some of us, it may be difficult for us to truly know if we're at 150 bpm or 170 bpm, but in terms of real world stamina, it makes a huge difference if you can keep your heart rate out of the "red" zone.

I dislike the monitor though, since at least for mine (Polar), it's a strap that goes around the chest. I find that if I'm working hard, it can sometimes slide out of place, and it's a pain to put back in the middle of a ride. If I make it really tight it doesn't slide, but it's less comfortable.
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 04:05 PM
 
Originally Posted by keekeeree View Post
Right town, wrong state. Ohio.

That's probably for the best.

My SO is from the Illinois one, and right after I asked it occurred to me you could have been one of the many people from back home she can't stand.
     
tie
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 07:30 PM
 
I have a heart rate monitor, I think by Polar, and it is incredibly flaky. Can't bike near power lines and expect the signal to work. And I don't know how you can really know what zone you are in without professional calibration.

Unlike almost everyone else, I'd say don't worry about the shorts/underwear/whatever until you are going on longer rides. For rides over 50 miles, I pay attention.

Definitely wear bright colors, though. It may look stupid, but if it gets you noticed it is important. Road biking is dangerous.

Also recommend clipless pedals. I biked for a long time without them, but now I know they make a huge difference. I'd never go back.
The 4 o'clock train will be a bus.
It will depart at 20 minutes to 5.
     
climber
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pacific NW
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 07:37 PM
 
Glen,

I think you have got some pretty good advice so far. I will echo one comment already made. That is to really think about what kind of roads and trails you plan on riding. Road bike make poor off road bikes and Mtn bikes literally drag on the pavement. Most anyone who is serious and rides on both will have both bike.

One last suggestion is good cycling shoes with clippedals. Almost as important as good cycling shorts and a good saddle.

Cycling is additive and expensive. I have two mtn bikes, two track bikes, a road bike, a loaded touring bike, and a fixed gear commuter.
climber
     
brassplayersrock²
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 07:41 PM
 
:;psst:: it's Glenn
     
MarkLT1
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: More Cowbell...
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 07:47 PM
 
Originally Posted by tie View Post
I have a heart rate monitor, I think by Polar, and it is incredibly flaky. Can't bike near power lines and expect the signal to work. And I don't know how you can really know what zone you are in without professional calibration.
What do you mean by "professional calibration?" A heart rate monitor needs no calibration, it is simply measuring the beats of your heart. If you mean in terms of "No way to know what zone you are in unless you have had a full on anaerobic stress test" in a lab, then you are partially right. There is no way to know for sure unless you have the full on suite of tests with blood drawn, VO2 tests, etc..

That being said, you can get a close approximation by doing your own maximum heart rate test, and back calculating from there. Its a lot better than going by feel.
     
abe
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 08:04 PM
 
Originally Posted by OreoCookie View Post
Bike
It's hard to get a bike without front suspension these days (save for race bikes, of course). If you don't plan on doing trails and trials (which I think you don't, considering the type of bike you're interested in), rear suspension will only waste your energy and add to the cost and the weight of the bike.

Equipment
(i) Helmet. Don't save on this one. Get a new one after each fall (there is a 50 % discount if you send in your old helmet).
(ii) Gloves. I got some nasty scars, because I didn't wear any at one point. Plus, it's more comfortable. I don't have gel-padded gloves, the cushion on mine consists of rubber mesh (= better air flow).
(iii) A bike computer.
(iv) In my experience wearing (tight) underwear is just fine. I use tight boxers, not the tighty wihities my grandfather has. Plus, I find cycling shorts equally comfortable with non-padded regular shorts. In my book, this one is optional.
(v) A bubble for water. This one is only crucial if you do longer tours (2+ hours), otherwise a bottle of water is fine.
Would you please explain what this means?

Is it a European term for a drinking fountain that one might find in parks or near municiple tennis courts?

Or is it a specialized device of some other sort?

I've tried Googling the term and only come up with indoor bubbling art or design pieces or the soapy bubbles.
America should know the political orientation of government officials who might be in a position to adversely influence the future of this country. http://tinyurl.com/4vucu5
     
keekeeree
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Moved from Ohio's first capital to its current capital
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2008, 10:07 PM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
That's probably for the best.

My SO is from the Illinois one, and right after I asked it occurred to me you could have been one of the many people from back home she can't stand.
This Chillicothe isn't much to write home about either. I'm a transplant from South Dakota...and while there's some great things about it, I won't be staying.

Maybe there's something in the name? Anyone from Chillicothe, MO?
     
OreoCookie
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2008, 02:18 AM
 
Originally Posted by abe View Post
Would you please explain what this means?

Is it a European term for a drinking fountain that one might find in parks or near municiple tennis courts?
No, it's a rubber bubble that can take up to 3 l of liquid. You can drink via tube. Most backpacks have a hole (usually marked with H20 or so) for the tube.
We call 'em bubbles or (Trink)blase ((drinking) bubble) in Germany.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
brassplayersrock²
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2008, 02:34 AM
 
ooo, a camel pack
     
OreoCookie
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2008, 03:09 AM
 
Oh, that's what they're called
Well, that's just a company here â€Ĥ (Camelpak and Deuter are the two main companies, I prefer Camelpaks â€Ĥ )
( Last edited by OreoCookie; Apr 22, 2008 at 03:52 AM. )
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
ghporter  (op)
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2008, 07:59 AM
 
The company that makes those drinking bladders here in the States is called "Camelback". I got my first one about 9 years ago specifically for bicycling. I now have a 50oz, 2 packs with spots for 70oz bladders, and one 100oz unit. I'll be riding with the 50oz one.

Yesterday evening I picked out and tested my bike, then had a lot of help getting it set up. It's a Specialized Rockhopper Disc. Hardtail, 6" disc brakes, 3 sprocket front and 8 sprocket rear Shimano trigger shift derailleurs, and of course it's got a 21" frame so it actually fits me. Flat pedals for now because I need to get the feel for the bike before I go to clips. I also got Specialized's wireless bike computer-it has everything but a pacer.

My wife got a Giant Rincon ladies' mountain bike-it's a bit smaller overall, but also a hardtail and with the same derailleurs as on my bike and the same computer. We also both got new helmets and gloves.

We went with full mountain bikes because we WILL be doing off-road riding, and the place we're going to be doing that, Government Canyon State Wildlife Area, has some really harsh trails-even the relatively mild trails are rough and steep. So we have bikes that won't get bashed to pieces the first time we hit those trails. They have fairly mild tires though, so they will do OK on the street. And my fork can be locked so I don't lose any energy in the suspension. My wife's can't be locked, but it can be pretensioned pretty hard, and that should help her out a lot. And since I expect to be riding on the street for fitness, being a little less efficient on the street is not going to be a major problem. Just more work.

And of course the weather today is crappy and I have a pretty full schedule, so I won't really get a chance to hit the road with it today. Drat!

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
OreoCookie
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2008, 09:39 AM
 
AFAIK the company Camelbak is written with k only and it's one word.
Anyway, if you have one, great. I prefer Camelbak bladders to Deuter bladders (I don't like the mechanism to close the bladder, it's far easier on Camelbaks). I think a hardtail is a very good choice for what you do. You have more money for quality components

Congrats on your purchase.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
ghporter  (op)
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2008, 09:43 AM
 
Yep, you're right about the spelling. In trying to emphasize one thing, I messed up another. Of course I could have actually LOOKED at the label on any one of my rigs...

I'm looking forward to hitting the road (and trail) as soon as both weather and schedule cooperate. Thanks for the support.

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
OreoCookie
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2008, 10:14 AM
 
I'm glad that I can take my bike to work again, too
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
ghporter  (op)
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2008, 10:41 AM
 
With any luck, the recent construction (or planning thereof) of a number of small hospitals within a couple of miles of my home will mean that in a year or so I'll be working within easy bicycle distance (and manageable street traffic) of work. Excellent combination!

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
scottiB
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Near Antietam Creek
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2008, 11:23 AM
 
Originally Posted by keekeeree View Post
This Chillicothe isn't much to write home about either. I'm a transplant from South Dakota...and while there's some great things about it, I won't be staying.

Maybe there's something in the name? Anyone from Chillicothe, MO?
It's pretty there. My father is from Gallipolis, and we'd drive through Chillicothe on 35 from MIchigan.
I am stupidest when I try to be funny.
     
peeb
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2008, 11:31 AM
 
Have I missed discussion on shoes and pedals? To me that's a huge thing.
     
ghporter  (op)
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2008, 07:30 PM
 
There hasn't been a discussion of shoes yet. Partly because we decided to stick with flat pedals for a while-so we can get the feel for these bikes-they're WAY beyond anything we've ever ridden before. Once we are comfortable with riding them on various (fairly mild) terrain, we'll start looking at clips.

I took my bike out for about 20 minutes this afternoon. Mostly just around my neighborhood, but that is kind of harsh in places-we have some humongous hills (at least to me) to deal with. That gearset is SWEET! I was able to climb hills that would have kicked my butt on my old bike without hurting or straining. One street nearby is set up to be expanded from two lanes to four, with the extra right-of-way left grassy. For about a quarter mile it has a three to four foot berm on it, lengthwise. I rode that to get the feel for rough but level ground and it was great. Overall, I'm very pleased with the bike, and if I can find a time when it's not 90˚F with early rush hour traffic everywhere, I'll put a lot more miles on it.

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
peeb
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2008, 07:34 PM
 
My advice to get clipless pedals sooner rather than later, or use toeclips, at the very least. It makes it much easier to get a circular motion in your legs and get away from the 'piston' motion that pedals without clips tend to lead to.
     
climber
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pacific NW
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2008, 08:16 PM
 
Most definitely get the clipless pedals sooner rather than later. I have the Shimano SPD's on a few bikes. A very good pedal unless it gets very muddy. If you do purchase a set, just loosen the tension so the foot comes off easily. You can tighten it back up as your confidence and balance improves. My last set were pretty tight from the factory, and I failed to notice until I needed the foot out fast on a technical spot. Ouch! If they are loose you will have no problems getting out when you need.

The biggest advantage to proper pedals (either clipless or toe-clips) is to learn to use your legs in a circular motion instead of a downward stroke only. This is much better for your knees for one, but it is also much more efficient. They also keep your foot in the correct position on the pedal. Otherwise the toe drifts too far forward.
climber
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2008, 08:52 PM
 
I dislike toe clips. I find them dangerous. Well, if you tighten them enough to actually make them useful, then they become dangerous, because they're too tight to get out of reliably.

OTOH, clipless pedals are very easy to get in and out of, after you get used to them. I found it took me a couple of days to get used to them.
     
Laminar
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2008, 09:56 PM
 
I finally got around to bring my bike down to Missouri with me after my last trip home, and just got back from my third real ride. I did 19-20 miles according to the route I mapped out on Google, and it felt really good. I have a 1987 Bridgestone 450 with a 62cm frame that fits my 6'5" frame great. I was about to say that I feel great, but a quick run down the stair revealed that my legs are a bit rubbery, but I feel pretty good for never having gone more than a couple miles at a time before this week.
     
keekeeree
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Moved from Ohio's first capital to its current capital
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2008, 11:29 PM
 
Originally Posted by Laminar View Post
I finally got around to bring my bike down to Missouri with me after my last trip home, and just got back from my third real ride. I did 19-20 miles according to the route I mapped out on Google, and it felt really good. I have a 1987 Bridgestone 450 with a 62cm frame that fits my 6'5" frame great. I was about to say that I feel great, but a quick run down the stair revealed that my legs are a bit rubbery, but I feel pretty good for never having gone more than a couple miles at a time before this week.
Sweet...I ride old-school too

My bike is an '87 Trek 1000 that I bought new when I was working summers as a mechanic for Sioux River Cyclery while in high school. I've road it on and off over the years but have really been racking up the miles in the past few years, having ridden close to 400 miles so far this year.

Towards the end of last summer, I started looking for a wheelset and came across a great deal on a whole bike...the Cannondale Black Lightning...on Craigslist. I rode it for about a month before I decided I liked the ride of my Trek better, so I cannibalized the wheelset, crankset, brakes, shifters and rear derailleur off the Cannondale
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2008, 11:44 PM
 
Originally Posted by keekeeree View Post
This Chillicothe isn't much to write home about either. I'm a transplant from South Dakota...and while there's some great things about it, I won't be staying.

Maybe there's something in the name? Anyone from Chillicothe, MO?

Well, over here the place is fine, it's the people who are a bit... problematic.

In the nearby town of Pekin, the high-school team until recently was the (I **** you not) Chinks.
     
Laminar
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2008, 11:57 PM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
In the nearby town of Pekin, the high-school team until recently was the (I **** you not) Chinks.
I'm sure they did well in the math bowl.
     
ghporter  (op)
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 23, 2008, 08:46 AM
 
My problem with clipless pedals and shoes is the cost of the shoes. Of course there are probably less expensive ways to buy shoes, but my bike shop had a wide assortment of shoes for clipless pedals-all in the $100+ range. I just spent a lot on the bike, and I really can't afford to buy the pedals and shoes right now. I CAN see how attaching the foot to the pedal would encourage better body mechanics, but I can't go there right now. I can go with add-on clips (which are relatively inexpensive) pretty quickly, and I don't think I'll have a huge problem with getting out of them when i need to (this being all in my head at the moment, since I haven't actually tried clips yet).

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
 
Thread Tools
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:26 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,