Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Funniest thing I've read in a long time...

Funniest thing I've read in a long time...
Thread Tools
ima_pseudonym
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 01:16 AM
 
...either that or I just haven't had enough sleep.


From the BBC http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pag...on/3013959.stm

No words to describe monkeys' play

A bizarre experiment by a group of students has found monkeys cannot write Shakespeare.

Lecturers and students from the University of Plymouth wanted to test the claim that an infinite number of monkeys given typewriters would create the works of The Bard.

A single computer was placed in a monkey enclosure at Paignton Zoo to monitor the literary output of six primates.

But after a month, the Sulawesi crested macaques had only succeeded in partially destroying the machine, using it as a lavatory, and mostly typing the letter "s".

The project, by students from the university's MediaLab Arts course, received �2,000 from the Arts Council.


Director of the university's Institute of Digital Arts and Technology (i-DAT), Mike Phillips, denied the project was a disaster and said they had learned "an awful lot".

He also denied it had been a waste of money.

He said the �2,000 was spent on purchasing the hardware to set up a radio link so the activities in the enclosure could be watched live on a website.

"Compared to the cost of reality TV, this was a tiny pinch of money," he said.

"It provided very stimulating and fascinating viewing."

The six monkeys - Elmo, Gum, Heather, Holly, Mistletoe and Rowan - produced five pages of text which consisted mainly of the letter "s".

Book published

But towards the end of the experiment, their output slightly improved, with the letters A, J, L and M also appearing.

However, they failed to come up with anything that remotely resembled a word.

Paignton Zoo scientific officer Dr Amy Plowman said: "The work was interesting but had little scientific value, except to show that the 'infinite monkey' theory is flawed."

The results of the experiment formed part of a larger project developed by i-DAT.

They have been published in a limited edition book entitled Notes Towards The Complete Works of Shakespeare.

Published: 2003/05/09 12:28:05 GMT

� BBC MMIII
     
Cipher13
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 01:22 AM
 
I know it's just a jab, but still. The "theory" holds strong. Until they get infinite monkeys, and don't make them SHARE one computer...
     
mitchell_pgh
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 01:26 AM
 
Ugh, and there are people out there trying to preform legitimate research that can't even find �500 for office supplies...

F@#$ing computers and monkeys... what were they thinking...

Hilarious...
     
ima_pseudonym  (op)
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 01:56 AM
 
Originally posted by mitchell_pgh:
Ugh, and there are people out there trying to preform legitimate research that can't even find �500 for office supplies...

Actually, it might turn a profit - they are selling copies of the monkey's book for �25.
     
Misanthrope
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 01:59 AM
 
Originally posted by Cipher13:
I know it's just a jab, but still. The "theory" holds strong. Until they get infinite monkeys, and don't make them SHARE one computer...
Anything that involves the inifite usually includes anything. So if somehow an infinite amount of monkeys were to start banging away on some keyboards/typewriters, they'd eventually write everything that could be written with a given alphabet.

Awesome eh?
     
Face Ache
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 02:04 AM
 
Superchic[k]en came close to spelling a word right the other day.
     
Misanthrope
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 02:07 AM
 
Originally posted by Face Ache:
Superchic[k]en came close to spelling a word right the other day.
THE END IS NEAR














     
Stradlater
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Off the Tobakoff
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 02:11 AM
 
yeah, haha, the infinite theory is far from "flawed"... not a waste of money, indeed
     
Mastrap
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 02:15 AM
 
Originally posted by Face Ache:
Superchic[k]en came close to spelling a word right the other day.

     
ima_pseudonym  (op)
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 02:32 AM
 
Originally posted by Misanthrope:
Anything that involves the inifite usually includes anything. So if somehow an infinite amount of monkeys were to start banging away on some keyboards/typewriters, they'd eventually write everything that could be written with a given alphabet.
They could only be expected to write every finite string, not all of the infinite ones too.

Don't forget that some infinite sets are bigger than others.
     
Steve
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In a world of Infinite Keys
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 03:00 AM
 
Originally posted by Misanthrope:
Anything that involves the inifite usually includes anything. So if somehow an infinite amount of monkeys were to start banging away on some keyboards/typewriters, they'd eventually write everything that could be written with a given alphabet.

Awesome eh?
Actually, that's incorrect. What if every monkey just hit the same key on the keyboard for an infinite amount of time?

You remind me my wife… why you laugh? She dead. | sasper at gmail dot com
     
Peter
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 03:06 AM
 
The experiment would have worked if it was an Apple Mac. Poor monkeys, the thing crashed, so they pressed S to save and then got pissed and trashed it. Who can blame them?
we don't have time to stop for gas
     
ima_pseudonym  (op)
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 03:06 AM
 
Originally posted by Steve:
Actually, that's incorrect. What if every monkey just hit the same key on the keyboard for an infinite amount of time?
I think the original description of the scenario is supposed to be monkeys *randomly* pressing keys on typewriters. So just holding down one key doesn't count. Even then, though, there is no guarantee that they will do it - it is just that the chance that they don't becomes vanishlingly small.
     
Steve
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In a world of Infinite Keys
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 03:07 AM
 
Originally posted by ima_pseudonym:
I think the original description of the scenario is supposed to be monkeys *randomly* pressing keys on typewriters. So just holding down one key doesn't count. Even then, though, there is no guarantee that they will do it - it is just that the chance that they don't becomes vanishlingly small.
Well, there can be no "randomness" in what the they will do. The randomness could be the same key pressed for infinity. There is a probability attached to each key being hit, but each probability is independant and therefore could be zero in a particular case. In general, all we know is that the monkeys stab at the keys randomly and without understanding what they're doing.

You remind me my wife… why you laugh? She dead. | sasper at gmail dot com
     
ima_pseudonym  (op)
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 03:08 AM
 
Originally posted by PeterClark2002:
The experiment would have worked if it was an Apple Mac. Poor monkeys, the thing crashed, so they pressed S to save and then got pissed and trashed it. Who can blame them?
LOL
     
ima_pseudonym  (op)
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 03:15 AM
 
Originally posted by Steve:
Well, there can be no "randomness" in what the they will do. The randomness could be the same key pressed for infinity.
I think in this context, random just means that at any time there is an equal probability of them striking any key. You're right that that could result in them pressing the same key every time, but the odds of that are infinitessimally small (like flipping an unbiased coin forever and never getting tails).





{This post may finally get me out of "junior" status}
     
Steve
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In a world of Infinite Keys
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 03:24 AM
 
Originally posted by ima_pseudonym:
I think in this context, random just means that at any time there is an equal probability of them striking any key. You're right that that could result in them pressing the same key every time, but the odds of that are infinitessimally small (like flipping an unbiased coin forever and never getting tails).





{This post may finally get me out of "junior" status}
But that's not the nature of a monkey. They are not "random", which is the flaw in this "experiment" (errr, what should we call it? theory?)

And re: a fair coin. The coin has no past memory of what is has been flipped, so it *is* possible to have a coin flip for infinity and never land on tails.

(congrats on getting out of "junior" status )

You remind me my wife… why you laugh? She dead. | sasper at gmail dot com
     
ima_pseudonym  (op)
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 03:38 AM
 
Yes, there is a chance that an unbiased coin could come up heads forever, it is just really really unlikely. The chance that it would happen is the smallest number you can think, divided by 2, and then divided by 2 again, and yet again, ..... (I believe that the chance of that happening is actually smaller than the chance that all of the oxygen molecules in your room will gather in one corner and leaving you no air to breathe, which could happen, but is not likely to before the universe ends)


I always though monkeys were a pretty good example to use for random key-pressers with the way they madly flail their arms around.
     
AlbertWu
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: boulder, co
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 03:46 AM
 
how bout we run a computer program that "randomly" presses "keys" and tries to form a coherent SENTENCE =P
Ad Astra Per Aspera - Semper Exploro
     
Face Ache
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 03:56 AM
 
Originally posted by AlbertWu:
how bout we run a computer program that "randomly" presses "keys" and tries to form a coherent SENTENCE =P
You want to put superchic[k]en out of a job?

Besides, that would never attract funding.
     
tintub
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Melbourne, AU (from Bristol UK)
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 05:18 AM
 
Originally posted by ima_pseudonym:
I think the original description of the scenario is supposed to be monkeys *randomly* pressing keys on typewriters. So just holding down one key doesn't count. Even then, though, there is no guarantee that they will do it - it is just that the chance that they don't becomes vanishlingly small.
I think the point is, however long you wait, if they haven't done it yet then the experiment isn't finished yet, and if they have, then it worked. I think the reality is the monkeys would die before they had even got one coherent sentence out.
     
Jim_MDP
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kali
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 07:39 AM
 
Originally posted by ima_pseudonym:
...I believe that the chance of that happening is actually smaller than the chance that all of the oxygen molecules in your room will gather in one corner and leaving you no air to breathe, which could happen, but is not likely to before the universe ends.
Not sure why, maybe now I'm tired...but that sudden mental image just made me laugh.

     
Ghoser777
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 09:25 AM
 
Typing monkeys are silly.

Infinite Monkeys

Okay, so it's a misnomer and there is only one monkey, but you get the idea.

Matt Fahrenbacher
     
ima_pseudonym  (op)
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 10:53 AM
 
Originally posted by Ghoser777:
Typing monkeys are silly.

Infinite Monkeys

Okay, so it's a misnomer and there is only one monkey, but you get the idea.

Matt Fahrenbacher
Nice!

Now if you could just add 1) more spaces, and 2) a running filter against a spell check dictionary that would pull off each actual word as it appeared and append it to a different window, I would probably leave it running on for a few days and see what came out.

Hey, maybe this could be the next SETI or folding distributed processing project! Thousands of computers all over the world, randomly trying to recreate Shakespeare.
     
Cipher13
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2003, 11:01 AM
 
Originally posted by Misanthrope:
Anything that involves the inifite usually includes anything. So if somehow an infinite amount of monkeys were to start banging away on some keyboards/typewriters, they'd eventually write everything that could be written with a given alphabet.

Awesome eh?
Exactly.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,