Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Applications > whole disk encryption

whole disk encryption
Thread Tools
mfbernstein
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Jose
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2007, 02:34 PM
 
I've been looking for a way to encrypt my entire boot disk on MacOS X (or failing that, at least a full partition of my boot disk). So far, no luck. Anybody know of a product that will do this? Thanks.

P.S. Yes, I've checked both FIleVault and PGP. FileVault won't do partition level encryption. PGP won't encrypt partitions on the boot drive.
     
Person Man
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest Ohio
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2007, 02:36 PM
 
Originally Posted by mfbernstein View Post
I've been looking for a way to encrypt my entire boot disk on MacOS X (or failing that, at least a full partition of my boot disk). So far, no luck. Anybody know of a product that will do this? Thanks.

P.S. Yes, I've checked both FIleVault and PGP. FileVault won't do partition level encryption. PGP won't encrypt partitions on the boot drive.
Why do you want to encrypt the entire boot drive?
     
mfbernstein  (op)
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Jose
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2007, 03:32 PM
 
Simplicity. As I said, my /Users partition would work too.

I'd settle for encrypting my home directory. Unfortunately, FileVault insists on using a sparse disk image which makes things slow, and not very reliable, and given that I have 100+ GB of data to encrypt and regularly transfer 10-15GB a week, I'd rather have something more robust.
     
TETENAL
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2007, 03:33 PM
 
You can use FileVault which encrypts the whole user folder(s) and you can also turn on encrypted (secure) virtual memory. That should be pretty secure. I don't see the need to encrypt system files and applications.
     
OreoCookie
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2007, 03:35 PM
 
Another problem is corruption: if the disk image file gets corrupted, then this might hose all of your data. There is no encryption on a file-by-file basis (yet?).
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
ghporter
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2007, 03:37 PM
 
Whole disk encryption would be a wonderful option for the Mac. So far as I know, all the products that do this focus on Windows.

WDE is good for preserving confidential information (SOX/HIPAA/etc.) on portable devices. Considering how poorly some U.S. agencies (as in the VA) have protected such confidential information, there should be tons of companies developing such products.

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Person Man
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest Ohio
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2007, 04:15 PM
 
Originally Posted by ghporter View Post
Whole disk encryption would be a wonderful option for the Mac. So far as I know, all the products that do this focus on Windows.
Seagate makes hard drives that have hardware-level encryption.

From this page (emphasis mine):
Security— Security means more than just erecting a firewall. Make sure that your employees use strong passwords that are changed on a regular basis and aren’t shared with other employees. In addition, mobile computers and devices should be encrypted in case of loss or theft. Full-disk-encryption (FDE) solutions encript data on the disk as it’s being written—the ideal way to prevent unauthorized access to data on a lost or stolen laptop. FDE solutions also simplify the process of wiping the drive clean of data when the equipment is retired or repurposed.
     
mfbernstein  (op)
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Jose
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2007, 11:01 PM
 
Unfortunately, that Seagate drive is only available to OEMs at this point. Further, there's no evidence that it's even Mac compatible yet. So yeah, it looks cool, but so far, no dice.

The best I've come up with is moving my user directory to an external drive and using PGP Whole Disk. Kinda negates the whole point of having a laptop though.
     
RealMac
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2007, 11:30 PM
 
The HFS+ format doesn't currently support entire disk encryption. So until Apple adopts a file system capable of this functionality or extends HFS+ to support it, you might be waiting a while.

Comparison of file systems - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
( Last edited by RealMac; Mar 29, 2007 at 03:42 AM. )
It is in the moments of decision that your destiny is shaped.
www.therealmac.net
MBA Graduate, Creative Thinker, Nice Guy
     
legacyb4
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 29, 2007, 02:41 AM
 
Any idea what the impact on day to day performance is like with this or is it not even noticable?

Originally Posted by TETENAL View Post
... you can also turn on encrypted (secure) virtual memory...
Macbook (Black) C2D/250GB/3GB | G5/1.6 250GBx2/2.0GB
Free Mobile Ringtone & Games Uploader | Flickr | Twitter
     
JKT
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 29, 2007, 03:37 AM
 
I've not noticed it, but then again, it has been on ever since I got 10.4.0 so I wouldn't know if it does have an impact or not
     
mfbernstein  (op)
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Jose
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 29, 2007, 01:29 PM
 
Very instructively, there are now not one but two threads in the main OS X forum about FileVault problems.

RealMac: the problem isn't HFS+. ext3 and fat32 are also listed as not supporting encryption, yet in both cases there are robust partition level encryption solutions. The point is simply that those filesystem doesn't come with a built-in encryption facility.

The way PGP and others work is usually intercepting system calls between the FS and device driver level. This should work with pretty much any FS (obviously performance will vary).

At any rate, I guess my original question is answered: external disk or nothing. Anybody have experience here with PGP on Mac and an external disk? From their forum, it looks like things aren't ready for prime-time yet there either, but... And how about the rocbit or Addonics enclosures that do encryption (or any others I've missed)? Thanks.
( Last edited by mfbernstein; Mar 29, 2007 at 06:02 PM. )
     
Big Mac
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 29, 2007, 05:15 PM
 
I really don't trust software to handle the active encryption/decryption of large chunks of drive space. I knew from the outset that FileVault would cause people corruption issues. If I had to have an encrypted drive, I'd only go with a hardware solution like the new Seagate drive referenced above.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,