Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > Uber launches in Portland, drivers face fines for illegal operation

Uber launches in Portland, drivers face fines for illegal operation
Thread Tools
NewsPoster
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 7, 2014, 06:49 PM
 
Uber announced the launch of its ridesharing service in Portland at the end of last week, moving into Oregon's largest metropolitan area almost a month after coming to four other cities outside the area, including Hillsboro and Beaverton. However, the service hit a significant snag on the same day, running afoul of the Portland Bureau of Transportation (PBOT) and a city commissioner.

Within the city of Portland, taxi services are regulated by law, making it illegal for private for-hire transportation to operate without required permits. These laws were established in August 2012 to help address a problem with taxi services in the city, leading to regulations that require annual background checks, company licenses, vehicle inspections, identification plates and commercial insurance.

The problem is that Uber doesn't comply with any of the regulations, leaving its operation illegal in Portland. As such, City Commissioner Steve Novick -- who is in charge of the PBOT -- indicates that the city is going to crackdown on Uber drivers.

"There's nothing sharing about this so-called 'sharing economy' company: They want to profit in Portland without playing by the same rules as existing cab companies," said Novick. "People who pick up passengers for Uber in Portland should know that they are operating illegally, and could be subject to penalties. Public safety, fairness among competitors and customer service are our top priorities. Unlike permitted drivers, Uber drivers do not carry commercial insurance, putting Portland customers at great risk."

Portland Uber drivers face a number of potential fines, starting with a $1,000 first offense for driving without the proper permit. Subsequent fees for the same offense jump up to $2,500 for the second citation and $5,000 for every one thereafter. Portland can also issue citations for code violations in a number of other areas against Uber or drivers, such lacking a company permit, plates, decals, insurance or items like fare violations or missing driver identification. When speaking about Uber drivers, Novick told The Oregonian that the PBOT "will try to catch them and seek penalty," going as far as suggesting code enforcement officers setup rides to find violators.

"They think they can just come in here and flagrantly violate the law?" asked Novick when speaking about Uber's launch late Friday. "This is really amazing. Apparently, they believe they're gods."

Unfortunately, the debate over allowing Uber into Portland has turned into a mudslinging battle of public opinion. Portland Mayor Charlie Hales took to Facebook to reiterate that Uber's tactic of launching then asking for forgiveness later is still illegal in the city, leaving Portland to enforce regulations against the company and its drivers. The city is working on examining taxi regulation to protect the safety of consumers and drivers, with Novick mentioning that the PBOT is open to new ideas.

Even if Uber were to gain entry into Portland through regulation changes, Hales and Novick don't seem keen on the company operating within the city limits, due to its actions. Hales's post on Facebook says Portland continues to work with Lyft to "embrace that economy" and technology, but begrudgingly adds that Uber can be a part of that discussion. Novick told the New York Times that he would be inclined to let Lyft operate well before Uber, adding that "Lyft seems like a respectable company, and Uber seems like a bunch of thugs."



Uber spokeswoman Eva Behrend said on a blog post that the company has been engaged with Portland's government for more than a year. Behrend played up the demand for Uber's services, stating that "more than 27,000 residents have indicated they're looking for a safe, reliable, and hassle-free ride."
T
o put that in perspective, less than 500 taxi licenses in Portland are issued, leaving many areas without adequate service or facing long delays. The claimed 27,000 residents seeking the service is substantial, but it's a mere fraction of Portland's more than 600,000 population, according to 2013 US Census estimates.

Oregon could do with more jobs, as it currently holds the ninth highest unemployment rate in the country, at seven percent as of October 2014, per the US Department of Labor.

Behrend adds that Uber is trying to "cut down on drunk driving, serve underserved communities, increase transit to small business and help drive the local economy." While "nearly 500 drivers" are looking forward to being paid for being Uber drivers, Behrend neglects to mention that Uber is notorious for paying drivers low wages -- in some cases below minimum wage due to the fees taken by the company, types of fares, hours worked, and the often high cost of operating as an independent contractor. In Uber's defense, its fare structure varies widely depending on the time of operation, location, date, and weather conditions.

For now, the company continues to operate in the city. While Uber has run into numerous issues across the globe, it's possible that a resolution can be reached with Portland's government in order to come up with new, appropriate regulations. Otherwise, Uber could face a battle similar to the shut down it's fighting in Nevada.

"We have told Uber and Lyft that they are welcome to offer ideas for regulatory changes," said Novick. "Uber has chosen instead to break the law."
( Last edited by NewsPoster; Dec 8, 2014 at 07:30 AM. )
     
aardman
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2009
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 7, 2014, 07:23 PM
 
"Lyft seems like a respectable company, and Uber seems like a bunch of thugs."

Aptly put.
     
djbeta
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 8, 2014, 02:01 AM
 
My friend just started driving for Uber as a way to make extra cash on top of his day job, and he loves it. He also told me that Uber will pay for ANY ticket that is imposed by the government. It is a collaboration between Bloomberg, Google, and (i forget the 3rd party).. in any case, yep, definitely a bunch of rich, smart thugs.. but you know what? They *are* or *have* improved the "taxi" service. So, improve your service taxi business. It's not hard, repeat their model. It's pretty easy. Just put money behind it and find a talented bunch of people.
     
elroth
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 8, 2014, 07:24 AM
 
Uber worked with the local suburban governments around the city of Portland, and pretended to negotiate with Portland officials, but decided it didn't like Portland's laws, so it just started up there illegally. They are thugs - just look what happens to anyone who criticizes them - they threaten them with releasing their private information, and even show them how they can do it. They have absolutely no scruples.

One issue between Uber and Portland is that the city requires that drivers be screened, which Uber won't do.
     
DiabloConQueso
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 8, 2014, 11:44 AM
 
Whether or not the drivers enjoy working for Uber, and whether or not Uber floats the bill for any infractions of their drivers, and whether or not the people using Uber think it's a nice service have absolutely zero bearing on whether or not their operations are legal or illegal.

Uber doesn't carry insurance on their drivers -- so if you hop in an Uber ride and the driver gets in an accident and you are injured, Uber isn't obligated to cover anything and you're left with whatever personal/private insurance (if any) the Uber driver carries.

There are other regulations and laws Uber is skirting, but that one alone should be more than enough to tell Uber that they're operating an illegal, uninsured taxi service that could potentially leave injured people out in the cold so-to-speak and prevent them from operating.

Whether or not it's a "nice" or "useful" service doesn't matter... no one cares about the drivers' and passengers' little emotions and feelings when it comes down to whether or not Uber is operating safely and within the bounds of the law.
     
coffeetime
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 8, 2014, 01:59 PM
 
Recently an Uber driver is arrested for rape. Background screening helps. This is just beginning since the service is still new. Eventually criminals find their ways in.... including knowing where you work and live, and then home invasion. There are reasons for all those legal restrictions. Uber makes it too easy for criminals.
( Last edited by coffeetime; Dec 8, 2014 at 03:08 PM. )
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:39 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,