|
|
IBM.... the new Motorola? (Page 2)
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
No, not really.
IBM has been improving at a faster pace than MOT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Socially Awkward Solo
According to Appleinsider it is only going to be 2.7 GHz.
Either way now you have to admit it is already looking like a Motorola. And don't bring up vaporware.
Not really. Freescale is still at 1.67 GHz. The G5 is faster per clock (for FP), and it looks like it's going to be at 2.7 GHz within the month.
But yeah, I'd like to see either faster clock speeds or else dual-core this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belgium
Status:
Offline
|
|
I for one am really concerned about this.
EDIT: quick reply rocks
|
iMac 20" C2D 2.16 | Acer Aspire One | Flickr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winnipeg
Status:
Offline
|
|
You know, a speed bump of 200Mhz... is actually kinda really sad... I mean I know moore's law is not that great of something to rely on but still... there's like no incentive for anyone with like even a Dual 2 to upgrade as far as I see...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hanging on the wall at Jabba's Palace
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Superchicken
You know, a speed bump of 200Mhz... is actually kinda really sad... I mean I know moore's law is not that great of something to rely on but still... there's like no incentive for anyone with like even a Dual 2 to upgrade as far as I see...
200MHz is really pathetic, seems that it was everyones complaint with Motorola and that IBM would be like this.
I mean when did the Dual 2.5's come out anyway?
|
"Laugh it up, fuzz ball!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belgium
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Socially Awkward Solo
200MHz is really pathetic, seems that it was everyones complaint with Motorola and that IBM would be like this.
I mean when did the Dual 2.5's come out anyway?
August last year IIRC
|
iMac 20" C2D 2.16 | Acer Aspire One | Flickr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hanging on the wall at Jabba's Palace
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
"Laugh it up, fuzz ball!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
Things aren't looking a whole lot better for AMD either guys.
|
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Lateralus
Things aren't looking a whole lot better for AMD either guys.
I dunno, things look stellar to me for AMD. AMD has dual-core chips with integrated memory controllers coming out this month, and they're likely to debut at 2.4 GHz. Indeed, it seems Intel is playing catchup to AMD, since Intel's dual-core solution is not as elegant as AMD's.
Now, you many be commenting about AMD's ability to reach only 2.6 GHz for its single-core CPUs, but a dual single-core 2.6 GHz Opteron box should perform a bit faster in real-life stuff (and I'm not talking about games either) than Apple's 2.7 GHz G5 dual.
That said, the G5 2.7 is at least in the right ballpark, and Tiger is looking good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
Now, you many be commenting about AMD's ability to reach only 2.6 GHz for its single-core CPUs, but a dual single-core 2.6 GHz Opteron box should perform a bit faster in real-life stuff (and I'm not talking about games either) than Apple's 2.7 GHz G5 dual.
That said, the G5 2.7 is at least in the right ballpark, and Tiger is looking good.
Unless it's a dual, dual-core 2.7GHz 970MP. Nothing like having over 10GHz at you fingertips.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: columbus, oh
Status:
Offline
|
|
200MHz in 8 months is better than 50MHz in a year when the G4 was released.
|
"Another classic science-fiction show cancelled before its time" ~ Bender
15.2" PowerBook 1.25GHz, 80GB HD, 768MB RAM, SuperDrive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The Sar Chasm
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by CD Hanks
sometimes i fall down
And you just lay there forever when you do, right? Just like IBM's chip designers. when they didn't hit 3 GHZ, they all just gave up and went home last year. They'll never make another chip again, ever.
Unlike Intel, who in the last year have progressed from 3.4 GHZ to... oh... never mind.
|
When a true genius appears in the world you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. -- Jonathan Swift.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Unless the new G5s are all dual core, I'm guessing the G6 should make its debut sometime in 1.5 - 2 years.
|
Genius. You know who.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by chris v
And you just lay there forever when you do, right? Just like IBM's chip designers. when they didn't hit 3 GHZ, they all just gave up and went home last year. They'll never make another chip again, ever.
Unlike Intel, who in the last year have progressed from 3.4 GHZ to... oh... never mind.
Well, actually Intel has gone up to 3.8 GHz. They'll also have dual-core this month, although their implementation of it isn't so great.
I just hope IBM can get the dual-core 970MP out by the end of this year, along with PCIe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Placid Casual
Well, I for one vote we go back to Motorola
You mean Freescale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by thunderous_funker
9 fans isn't necessary for cooling--its necessary for cooling *quietly*.
Lots of fans in key areas spinning only as fast as they need to rather than very big fans blowing hard all day long generating a lot of noice.
After the "WindTunnel" G4s I think they're very conscious of noise and thermal design.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by olePigeon
I'm interested in IBM's Scale processeor jointly developed by IBM, Toshiba, and Sony. It's gonna be used in the Playstation 3
I think you mean Cell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Socially Awkward Solo
According to Appleinsider it is only going to be 2.7 GHz.
ThinkSecret.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Edmonton, AB
Status:
Offline
|
|
I would guess that the g6 comes in late 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: The bottom of Cloud City
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well I hate to say I told ya so. 2.7 HGz today? so the 3GHz is a year late NOW and I bet it won't be out for another 8 months.
|
"Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
I dunno, things look stellar to me for AMD. AMD has dual-core chips with integrated memory controllers coming out this month, and they're likely to debut at 2.4 GHz. Indeed, it seems Intel is playing catchup to AMD, since Intel's dual-core solution is not as elegant as AMD's.
Now, you many be commenting about AMD's ability to reach only 2.6 GHz for its single-core CPUs, but a dual single-core 2.6 GHz Opteron box should perform a bit faster in real-life stuff (and I'm not talking about games either) than Apple's 2.7 GHz G5 dual.
That said, the G5 2.7 is at least in the right ballpark, and Tiger is looking good.
What does a dual opteron cost?* It's all well and good saying such and such is at blah-de-blah but if there are wild prices differences, comparisons can't really be made.
*Really. I have no idea where to even look for a decent opteron based system. Help a guy out would ya? Should I put money on the Mac costing more?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by :XI:
*Really. I have no idea where to even look for a decent opteron based system. Help a guy out would ya? Should I put money on the Mac costing more?
Boxx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OptimusG4
200MHz in 8 months is better than 50MHz in a year when the G4 was released.
And that is why even comparing the two is moronic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winnipeg
Status:
Offline
|
|
Oh well, least the Canadian price dropped a lot... before a dual 1.8Ghz G5 with 20inch would have been just about 4 grand, now it's just slightly over 3 grand. I think I might actually have to pick up one now... when I have three grand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: USA at the moment
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Zimphire
And that is why even comparing the two is moronic.
Or is it? Because when you think about in in percentages, (which I can't be bothered to work out right now), the G4 development may in fact have been as good if not better than current G5 development!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Night's Plutonian shore...
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
Nemo me impune lacesset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: The bottom of Cloud City
Status:
Offline
|
|
Told ya, IBM was just as bad in the end.
|
"Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Something about counting chickens and hatching.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yamanashi, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm still waiting for IBM to make a nice 2 hz G4 or a nice cool running G5 for laptop consumption. IBM is doing a good job with chips, seeing how its selling them to everyone these days and using them in their own servers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: The bottom of Cloud City
Status:
Offline
|
|
This is just a big "I told you so" to everyone who had their hopes up for vaporware Dual Core and G5 laptops, cell processors and calling the comparison "Moronic".
I smelt a rat over a year ago yet next to nobody agreed with me ~cough~ Eug (no offense buddy) and always wrong Zimphire
Sure Steve is still going to push Power PC for the next year cuz he wants to sell computers but a year from now he will be bashing the G5.
|
"Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Off the Tobakoff
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Severed Hand of Skywalker
This is just a big "I told you so" to everyone who had their hopes up for vaporware Dual Core and G5 laptops, cell processors and calling the comparison "Moronic".
I smelt a rat over a year ago yet next to nobody agreed with me ~cough~ Eug (no offense buddy) and always wrong Zimphire
Sure Steve is still going to push Power PC for the next year cuz he wants to sell computers but a year from now he will be bashing the G5.
|
"You rise," he said, "like Aurora."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: The bottom of Cloud City
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by brapper
you win.
booya.
Now lets see everyone try to make me look bad for being right.
|
"Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|