Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Notebooks > any TiBook owners have PCMCIA flash memory reader??

any TiBook owners have PCMCIA flash memory reader??
Thread Tools
Robster1958
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New York, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 12, 2003, 12:05 AM
 
i was thinking of buying a PCMCIA card that i can use to plug in a MemoryStick and read/write.

does ayone use this? if so, i was especially interested in whether you could leave the card inserted pemanently..does it stick out of PB..or is it flush?

also, is data transfer speed an issue, vs. USB?
Rob
2.1 Ghz 15" MacBook Pro 2 GB RAM, OS X 10.5

16 Gig iPod Touch
     
penmanila
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: manila, philippines
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 12, 2003, 01:05 AM
 
i've used a pc card holder for my compact flash card to download oictures from my digital camera into my tibook. it's cheap and fast. i don't think the pc card is ever really flush with the case--a little bit of it will always stick out, but it's not a problem.
AlBook 867 640/60/Combo/APE
iBook 500 320/10/CD/AP
2400c 180 80/18/Wi-Fi
Tons of Duos, Anything Mac and Small!
     
Phanguye
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Umbrella Research Center
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 12, 2003, 01:30 AM
 
i have a pcmcia card reader and it sits flush... i used to leave it in all the time but have started to take it out so dust and stuff doesnt get in
     
tooki
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 12, 2003, 01:33 AM
 
They seat flush. But with most such adapters, it's hard/impossible to remove a memory card from the adapter without pulling it out of the PC Card slot.

tooki
     
escher
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 12, 2003, 09:34 AM
 
How does transfer speed compare between a PC Card flash memory reader and a FireWire flash memory card reader? (Not USB, those are sucky slow.)

I went to an Apple-sponsored QTVR seminar two years ago and the pro photographer who was running it swore by his FireWire Lexar CF card reader. (He had a PB G4 and could thus have used a PC Card reader, if he wanted.)

Escher
"The only laptop computer that's useful is the one you have with you."
Until we get a 3 lbs sub-PowerBook, the 12-inch PowerBook will do.
     
nsxpower
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 12, 2003, 09:49 AM
 
How does transfer speed compare between a PC Card flash memory reader and a FireWire flash memory card reader? (Not USB, those are sucky slow.)

I went to an Apple-sponsored QTVR seminar two years ago and the pro photographer who was running it swore by his FireWire Lexar CF card reader. (He had a PB G4 and could thus have used a PC Card reader, if he wanted.)

Escher
FireWire is much faster then PCMCIA bus. I wish they hooked PCMCIA through the FW bus on the PowerBooks ... no need to carry around an external reader device w/ wired etc.
My Blog & Photos
PowerBook (Ti) 1Ghz � 1Gb � 60Gb � SD
     
audvidsvs
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Missouri
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 12, 2003, 09:50 AM
 
The adapter I have sits flush with the side if the computer.
I have to use eject button to get at it.
On my IBook I had to use an external reader thru USB and it seemed a lot slower than the PC card slot method.
This is also true on Windows machines that I have.
I did not even realize the TGiBook had a card slot until I got it and I am so glad it does
     
Robster1958  (op)
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New York, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 12, 2003, 06:22 PM
 
thanks for the replies.

now...any suggestions where to get one? (for memory stick).

they all seem to be about $40...should i just get the Sony brand?

oh...i assume with OS X.2, no drivers are needed?
Rob
2.1 Ghz 15" MacBook Pro 2 GB RAM, OS X 10.5

16 Gig iPod Touch
     
vdrummer
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fran Sancisco
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 12, 2003, 07:01 PM
 
I love the convenience of using the PCMCIA / CF adapter to transfer photos from my digicam. Also, it's my preferred method of file transfer to & from my Windows PC (512Mb Ultra CF card). I just leave the PCMCIA adapter in the Tibook all the time.

One recurring problem:
If the Tibook is asleep, and I insert the CF card, and then open the Tibook, the Tibook hangs and I must do a warm boot. Seems ok if I'm inserting and removing while Tibook is awake, but there's a hitch there somewhere; could be my PCMCIA, which is a Dazzle model from Compusa.
     
tooki
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 12, 2003, 09:53 PM
 
I doubt a FireWire reader would be faster, at least for CompactFlash. That's because CompactFlash is PCMCIA, just miniaturized. So the speed of PC Card is the bottleneck either way (this is assuming that Flash memory was infinitely fast, which it's not).

I don't think that any memory card is as fast as a PC Card bus.

tooki
     
kdixey
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bellingham, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2003, 12:23 AM
 
I love using my PCMCIA SmartMedia adapter. It's very convenient and fast. I prefer it over my USB card reader.
--
"We are more curious about the meaning of dreams than things we see when awake"

....Diogenes
     
oeyvind
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Somewhere near 1º18'N 103º50'E
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2003, 01:36 AM
 
Firewire based reader will be faster, tested.

Why? FireWire devices are all dma based ( only require cpu for setup ). So, the loading of copying files from / to a firewire device should be much less than a pc card ( which requires programmed i/o ).
     
escher
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2003, 10:50 AM
 
Originally posted by nsxpower:
FireWire is much faster then PCMCIA bus.
Originally posted by tooki:
I doubt a FireWire reader would be faster . . . because CompactFlash is PCMCIA, just miniaturized. So the speed of PC Card is the bottleneck either way (this is assuming that Flash memory was infinitely fast, which it's not).

I don't think that any memory card is as fast as a PC Card bus.
Originally posted by oeyvind:
Firewire based reader will be faster, tested.

Why? FireWire devices are all dma based ( only require cpu for setup ). So, the loading of copying files from / to a firewire device should be much less than a pc card ( which requires programmed i/o ).
Thanks for your replies, nsxpower, tooki and oeyvind. I guess this goes to show how little theory is worth if it is not backed up by empirical testing. I know the pro photographer/presenter at the seminar wouldn't have used a FW reader unless it was faster than a PC Card. Nonetheless, it's shocking that a cable-based interface is faster than a technology that connects directly to the mobo.

I wonder whether the 3rd generation PC Card standard (forget what it's called), which the PCMCIA recently announced, will change the situation. In the meantime, we'll either have to put up with slower transfers for internal convenience or put up with an external attachment for faster speeds. I guess life is full of compromises...

Escher
"The only laptop computer that's useful is the one you have with you."
Until we get a 3 lbs sub-PowerBook, the 12-inch PowerBook will do.
     
escher
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2003, 10:52 AM
 
PS: SanDisk just announced a new line of USB 2.0 card readers. Who the hell knows when Apple will finally wisen up and ship USB 2.0 on all Macs (despite the fact that FireWire is technically superior)?

Escher
"The only laptop computer that's useful is the one you have with you."
Until we get a 3 lbs sub-PowerBook, the 12-inch PowerBook will do.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,