Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > Apple drops cross-appeal against Samsung, gives up injunction

Apple drops cross-appeal against Samsung, gives up injunction
Thread Tools
NewsPoster
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 28, 2014, 09:09 PM
 
Two years after the first Apple-Samsung patent trial, the big winner in that case -- Apple -- has dropped a motion to cross-appeal a portion of Judge Lucy Koh's final verdict. The action means that the company has officially given up hope of seeing any product bans on the 23 Samsung products found guilty of copying Apple technology, though the matter is largely moot as none of the products are still offered for sale anyway. Despite the clear victory in the jury trial, Judge Koh twice refused to issue sales injunctions on the infringing Samsung products.

The filing, according to patent case analyst Florian Mueller, demonstrates that the dispute between the two companies "continues to lose steam" with "the parties' litigation fatigue [becoming] increasingly visible at the appeals courts. Last month, [Apple and Samsung] agreed to drop each other's appeals of the final ITC ruling on Apple's complaint." Apple's cross-appeal was intended only to dispute Judge Koh's denial of product bans; in all other regards, Apple was awarded a clean victory by the jury both in the original trial and in the retrial.

Originally, Samsung was found guilty on all charges brought by Apple, while Apple was cleared of all charges brought by Samsung. Further, the first jury awarded Apple just over $1 billion in damages. Due to juror error in calculating that award, a second trial was called to reassess about 40 percent of the original damages. Apple won the second trial as well, with the jury again siding with the iPhone maker but reducing the full award down to $929 million.

Samsung is continuing with its appeal of the first trial, but is looking for a wholesale reversal of the jury's verdicts rather than a fine-tuning on a particular point as Apple had sought. As Mueller notes, Apple may try to focus its efforts on getting a sales ban on the products named in the second Apple-Samsung trial, which Apple again won back in May, but which covers more recent products. A ruling on that request is expected in the near future.

Apple's motion reads as follows: "Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b), Plaintiff-Cross Appellant Apple Inc. ("Apple") moves to voluntarily dismiss its cross-appeal, No. 2014-1368. Apple further moves to reform the official caption of the remaining appeal (No. 2014-1335) to reflect the dismissal of Apple's cross-appeal. Counsel for Apple has conferred with counsel for Samsung Electronics Corporation, Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, "Samsung") regarding the substance of this motion. Samsung does not oppose the relief requested in this motion and will not file a response. Apple accordingly requests that the Court grant its motion and dismiss its cross-appeal and reform the official caption to reflect the dismissal. A proposed order is attached."


( Last edited by NewsPoster; Jul 28, 2014 at 10:08 PM. )
     
JEB
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: N. Calif.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 28, 2014, 10:22 PM
 
Samsung: clearly Apple's biggest admirer...
'Simplify. Simplify.' --Thoreau
     
pairof9s
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 29, 2014, 08:31 AM
 
Pretty sad when "winning" is losing in our legal system. My only wish now is that Apple rip off any decent idea Samsung comes up with (note the word "decent")...good for the goose, good for gander.
     
macmediausa
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 29, 2014, 11:54 PM
 
It pays to infringe on Patents. Samsung has reaped hundreds of billions of dollars in sales of infringing products knowing if they were sued, they could just keep on appealing and stalling to wring out every last dollar. $1b doesn't really cost them that much since they benefited far more. Hopefully bad press will cause them more pain than the monetary fines
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,