|
|
Could 64 bit be bad for me?
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Right here
Status:
Offline
|
|
the new Merom is 64 bit right? dosnt that mean that on most apps it will run slower ?every day Apps that are made for 32 bit? im not sure i understand all this, please explain the Pros and cons of Merom. and what apps will be effected poorly. thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Here
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'd Google it.
64-bit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It has alot of jargon, but it should help.
One should note that G5s and PPC 10.4 are 64-bit (though whether they are "truly" so is a point of debate) and Core Duos and x86 10.4 are 32-bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think your apps just won't run as fast as they could if they were optimized for 64 bit. I don't think it will slow them down.
|
-nate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bunch Of Islands in The Pacific
Status:
Offline
|
|
Um "ppc 10.4" is 64bit on the unix layer only. At least thats what was said during the keynote at WWDC earlier this month. When Leopard comes out the whole OS not just the unix layer will be 64bit.
Now when you ask if it's bad for me, are you talking from a software point of view or hardware. I ask because if you do anything that requires Adobe products you'll have to wait till Adobe release's UB versions to take advantage of either the Yonah or Merom no matter if one is 32 or 64. From what I gather the 64bit is mainly so apps can address memory higher than the 2gig limit now. For instance Photoshop running with 8gig would be smoking, or in my case Maya being able to use up to lets say 16gigs would absolutely rule.
silver
|
MBP 17" 2.16ghz, ATI x1600 256, 100GBHD, 2GB ram, 23"AppleLCD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Northern VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by silver
Um "ppc 10.4" is 64bit on the unix layer only. At least thats what was said during the keynote at WWDC earlier this month. When Leopard comes out the whole OS not just the unix layer will be 64bit.
Now when you ask if it's bad for me, are you talking from a software point of view or hardware. I ask because if you do anything that requires Adobe products you'll have to wait till Adobe release's UB versions to take advantage of either the Yonah or Merom no matter if one is 32 or 64. From what I gather the 64bit is mainly so apps can address memory higher than the 2gig limit now. For instance Photoshop running with 8gig would be smoking, or in my case Maya being able to use up to lets say 16gigs would absolutely rule.
silver
eh, I have a 32-bit linux computer with 4GB of RAM. I'm pretty sure that 4GB is the limit for 32-bit processors. Or maybe PPC processors are different.
|
iMac 24" | Core 2 Extreme 2.8GHz | 4GB RAM | 500GB HD
PowerBook G4 15" HR | 1.67GHz | 2GB RAM | 100GB HD
R.I.P 1995 Toyota Supra NA-T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
I really dont think it matters one iota wether you have 64 bit or not. Just get the 64 bit because it is the latest technology. there really is no need to question buying an updated product.... whatever your software is currently will run on the 64 bit with hardly a noticeable speed difference if any...
and software for macs is updated regularly anyway isnt it (excluding adobe)? im sure the companies will produce new versions for download for new platforms almost immediately after the release of a new platform so not buying the newer hardware because of software may be a bad way to go. might be shortchanging yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bunch Of Islands in The Pacific
Status:
Offline
|
|
I stand corrected Velocity211 is right, 4gig is the limiting factor for 32bit systems.
silver
|
MBP 17" 2.16ghz, ATI x1600 256, 100GBHD, 2GB ram, 23"AppleLCD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
4gb is the addressable limit per process on a 32-bit system.
In practice a single process can only access 2gb-3gb of memory (depending on the OS), part of the 4gb goes to the kernel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Right here
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks guys that clears up a lot for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|