|
|
HOLY ****! LimeWire on OSX doesn't suck anymore.
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: East Texas (omg)
Status:
Offline
|
|
Doth mine eyes deceive me?
Looks like they've given LimewireX a much needed overhaul. It is fast now (and i'm on a g3 imac). They moved the menubar up to the top, gave it a non-assugly icon, and sped it up like i thought they never would.
I'm truly amazed.
http://www.versiontracker.com/morein...0275&db=macosx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occasionally Useful
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Liverpool, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
as many times as i clicked on the installer, i couldn't get the fecker to install. it just did nothing. will try downloading it again...
[edit: update]
nope. it just zooms along at a ridiculous download speed, then fails to open in stuffit, leading me to think it's corrupt somehow. can anyone provide an alternative download url?
[ 02-21-2002: Message edited by: philzilla ]
|
"Have sharp knives. Be creative. Cook to music" ~ maxelson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Louisiana
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yes, this is a very good upgrade to Limewire. It's actually very usable now on my B&W G3/300
|
B&W G3/300 OS X 10.3 Server
AL G4/1.5 OS X 10.3
Next computer G5/3.X Ghz OS X 10.x.x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
uh, no. pigged up my whole system and refused to quit. After force-quitting i just put it with the past versions in digital never-never land.
Aquisition is still much better, and has only been out for a short time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Crib
Status:
Offline
|
|
Look, Aquistion is good, but it does not compare to Limewire if you are on a fast connection because Aquisition does not offer multisource downloads. The reason Limewire won't quit is that you need to go into the preferences and make sure it quits right away rather than waiting for any impending transfers to occur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
wouldn't unzip for me either.
|
The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it always to be kept alive.
- Thomas Jefferson, 1787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Is this a new version since last week. I downloaded a copy for use on my new iBook 600 last week and it still was: butt slow, really slow, and did I mention slow?
I hope its a new version...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Tuck, CT.
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's amazing how a little (still just a baby) app like aquisition can scare the $hite out of the folks at limewire!! They got on the ball and made their app usable!!!
|
My pants are fancier than yours!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Capital city of the Empire State.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yes, by golly, the newest LimeWire is a speed demon!
|
/mal
"I sentence you to be hanged by the neck until you cheer up."
MacBook Pro 15" w/ Mac OS 10.8.2, iPhone 4S & iPad 4th-gen. w/ iOS 6.1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nashville Tn.
Status:
Offline
|
|
OK although it is the fastest since 1.7 I'm having a problem.
I get it to run fine save all my prefs and then I'll hide it in the dock
to run in the background. When I go to unhide it ,it locks me up so bad I have to force reboot. It won't even lt me force quit. I can't even tab around to the terminal to kill it.
Whats up with that?
|
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
I join the satisfied group. I had installed and removed all previous versions of Limewire not because of speed, but because they didn't quite work! Now we have something that works AND speed. Great!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Wonderful , and I actually got swarm download to work !
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by moss514:
<STRONG>It's amazing how a little (still just a baby) app like aquisition can scare the $hite out of the folks at limewire!! They got on the ball and made their app usable!!!</STRONG>
LOL! That could be the reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by chris_h:
<STRONG>Doth mine eyes deceive me?
Looks like they've given LimewireX a much needed overhaul. It is fast now (and i'm on a g3 imac). They moved the menubar up to the top, gave it a non-assugly icon, and sped it up like i thought they never would.
I'm truly amazed.
http://www.versiontracker.com/morein...0275&db=macosx</STRONG>
Your right it is MUCH better. Why cant other OS X window resize like this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
hrmmmm. :-/
sounds like mine did not behave as others experienced. For me, LW was slow to even drag the window around... hogging CPU cycles like crazy, and hanging on actions like pull-down menus and the like.
Also: this is a problem I have in all apps of this sort: I find lots of stuff, but none of it ever downloads... maybe one out of 20 files will successfully connect and start downloading. Is it just my machine?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Manticore
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm, uh, not impressed. Aquisition is still better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chico, CA and Carlsbad, CA.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by MacAgent:
<STRONG>I'm, uh, not impressed. Aquisition is still better.</STRONG>
I have never gotten Aquisition, iSwipe, or LimeWire to work in OSX. I don't know what everyone is talking about. I searhc for files, audio and video, and nothing happens or they refuse to download. Hmmpf.
I heard that the new LimeWire was fast, and I was on my OS9 machine at the time so I tried the classic build, but it didn't seem that much snappier... and didn't return any hits when I searched for some popular video titles.
I will try Aquisition and LimeWire for OSX again when I get home.
|
"In Nomine Patris, Et Fili, Et Spiritus Sancti"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
Status:
Offline
|
|
How is it that there are such drastically different reports of experiences with limewire and aquistion? I have desperately wanted aquisition to work, but searches are slow, and the odds of getting a download are slim to none. Other people report "fantastic success" with aquisition? What gives?
Right now, I'm sticking with limewire, cause it will actually download.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Rock Island, IL
Status:
Offline
|
|
Wow. I'm really impressed with the update. Aquisition is okay...just not as robust as LimeWire. Though the past few versions of LimeWire have been almost unusable. Kudos to the guy's at LimeWire (finally got it right...at least a little closer to 'right').
|
Uva uvam vivendo varia fit - Augustus McCrae
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New York, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by cacarr1:
<STRONG>Wow. I'm really impressed with the update. Aquisition is okay...just not as robust as LimeWire. Though the past few versions of LimeWire have been almost unusable. Kudos to the guy's at LimeWire (finally got it right...at least a little closer to 'right').</STRONG>
Agreed.
Aquisition is pretty good, particularly since it's just at v. 0.5, but it does need some work both in the stability and speed departments (and also, IMHO with at least an option for tabbed searches rather than multiple windows).
The new Limewire solves all the slow interface problems. (Although it's still a somewhat clunky interface) The adds are annoying, but now it works quite well...
cpac
|
cpac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
The speed gain is like going from 10.0 to 10.1. They finally put out a product worth paying for so that's exactly what I did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sad King Billy's Monument on Hyperion
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by [APi]TheMan:
<STRONG>
I have never gotten Aquisition, iSwipe, or LimeWire to work in OSX. I don't know what everyone is talking about. I searhc for files, audio and video, and nothing happens or they refuse to download. Hmmpf.</STRONG>
You've gotta actually WAIT for the Gnutella client to establish at least a couple hundred connections before anything useful comes up. If you just search immediately after launching the program of COURSE nothing will show up.
|
I abused my signature until she cried.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hey I was just about to post a thread about how damn slow limewire's interface was on my machine and then I saw and started reading this thread. Since a few of you were saying it wasn't slow I thought I'd try a few things to see if mine would speed up.
My limewire interface would do this weird pulsing thing and clicks would take a while to register, I looked in process viewer and with the limewire window visable window manager was at like 80 - 100% on my dual.
But I found what must be a bug.. limewire doesn't like thousands of colors. I switched to millions and all of a sudden the problems were gone. Of course limewire froze my system upon the switch, so quit it first if you're gonna switch. My itunes framerates will drop but at least limewire will be usable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
I haven't tried this new limewire yet but I really love acquisiton. It definitely takes the crown as being the best filesharing client for OS X. I can easily find everything that i'm looking for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the Netherlands
Status:
Offline
|
|
Fast...??? seems even outdated ( )machines like a 300 G3 performs well considering limewire, but not the icebook (krove e.g.)! I also own an ibook600 with 384Mb ram and it still is s----l----o----w.
Why does a (seemingly) simple application like limewire runs this bad? Maybe it's the icebooks' slow hd's?
Stefan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Appleville, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't see much of a difference in speed. I do noticed some changes to the interface. But that is about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: yore
Status:
Offline
|
|
my college is run by fï¿œckin nazis and they started blocking limewire last semester. are there any alternate servers or whatever that I can connect to? limewire is the only file-sharing app that i've ever had any luck with, so i'd like to start using it again.
|
c l R a g n a r o k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Woohoo...this new version dows rock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<Red Commet>
|
|
For those who can't decompress limewire or get it to install:
Rename it from .sit to .zip and try again....
If you got it decompressed and it is still not possible to launch the installer:
Leave the faulty installer where it is en decompress the zip file again in the same location and try to launch the just extracted installer....
This worked for me...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ok, I take back anything positive I said about the new limewire....If i donwload a shitload of stuff after it's complete it just disappears.....nowhere to be found
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by iKevin:
<STRONG>Ok, I take back anything positive I said about the new limewire....If i donwload a shitload of stuff after it's complete it just disappears.....nowhere to be found</STRONG>
You didn't look hard enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Eug:
<STRONG>
You didn't look hard enough.</STRONG>
Sure I did...I also looked on the Limewire forums where there's a large thread of people that have the same issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<Typhoon14>
|
|
You guys should check out Fern. It's essentially a sleeker (cocoa) GUI slapped on limewire. Much faster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Edinburgh, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
You do realise, I assume, that by far the biggest factor in the GUI speedup is not any particular release of LimeWire but the recent Java Update 1.3.1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Capital city of the Empire State.
Status:
Offline
|
|
iKevin,
LimeWire creates an "Incomplete" folder at the root level of whichever drive you're downloading to. Only when the dl's are complete do they show up in the folder that you designate for your downloaded files.
I've never "lost" anything acquired with LimeWire. Have you done a Sherlock search for your missing files?
[ 04-08-2002: Message edited by: malvolio ]
|
/mal
"I sentence you to be hanged by the neck until you cheer up."
MacBook Pro 15" w/ Mac OS 10.8.2, iPhone 4S & iPad 4th-gen. w/ iOS 6.1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
When you kill a download for some reason ALL the files from incomplete are moved to the trash. (Or at least that's what I've found)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The Sar Chasm
Status:
Offline
|
|
I can't get limewire to actually download 1 in 10 files I try. It times out, for 200 then 1000 seconds between retrys, and almost never actually initiates a download. I'm on Road Runner, and usually try to download songs with at lest cable/dsl on the other end. I've been throught the prefs several times, and can't find anything of substance to alter. After 10 or 15 days of having Limewire, I've successfully downloaded a whopping total of 6 files. Not a real big thrill. Have yet to see an upload from my machine, either, although search attempts show up.
CV
|
When a true genius appears in the world you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. -- Jonathan Swift.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just for some clarifications
1) The initial speed increase happened before the Java update.
2) Gnutella works by connecting your machine to other machines. If you have dropped downloads that's probably because the person's machine you were downloading from disconected from the network. A good way around this is when you're doing a search and you see 13 of the same file, hit "Download Any."
3) There is no 3... okay, that was lame, but it's 5:25 in the morning here.
F-bacher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Belgium
Status:
Offline
|
|
This is still one one the worst apps I have ever used it is so damn slooooow. If you only want to download mp3's sputnix and aquisition are both much better. They don't crash ( aquisition 0.4 not 0.5), don't use 40 % of your CPU and don't take ages to start up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Edinburgh, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by malvolio:
<STRONG>iKevin,
LimeWire creates an "Incomplete" folder at the root level of whichever drive you're downloading to. Only when the dl's are complete do they show up in the folder that you designate for your downloaded files.
I've never "lost" anything acquired with LimeWire. Have you done a Sherlock search for your missing files?
[ 04-08-2002: Message edited by: malvolio ]</STRONG>
Yeah, there appears to be a bug in the most recent release. I don't have exactly the same problem as you, but on my machine LimeWire creates Incomplete and Shared folders at the root of my home directory every time I start it, even though I haven't specified that location for downloading to (and nor does it use it).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by malvolio:
<STRONG>iKevin,
LimeWire creates an "Incomplete" folder at the root level of whichever drive you're downloading to. Only when the dl's are complete do they show up in the folder that you designate for your downloaded files.
I've never "lost" anything acquired with LimeWire. Have you done a Sherlock search for your missing files?
[ 04-08-2002: Message edited by: malvolio ]</STRONG>
Yup...and nada...nothing in the system that could be the lost files. Look at the Limewire forums. This isn't a rare instance with the latest build. Seems to be a common problem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Live at the BBQ
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by iKevin:
<STRONG>
Yup...and nada...nothing in the system that could be the lost files. Look at the Limewire forums. This isn't a rare instance with the latest build. Seems to be a common problem</STRONG>
I had that problem when I updated to the recent version of Limewire... files would download into oblivion. I think I figured out the prob, tho...
Open the terminal, go to the root directory and switch to the "Volumes" directory. On my machine, I have two partitions (Mini X and Mini IX), but I should only see one in the Volumes directory, Mini IX (because Mini X is the root on my machine)... lo and behold, I have TWO directories in Volumes... Mini IX (my os 9 volume) and another called PowerBook IX (the old name for my os 9 volume). So, searching through this "ghost" directory ("ghost" because it shows up nowhere else: not the Finder, Sherlock, or any thing but the Terminal) I find a "Documents" directory, within which is a "Downloads" directory within which is an "Incomplete" and "Limewire Shared" directory... you can take a guess what I found in there. To make a long story longer, I proceeded to mv the downloaded files I didn't have already and rm the stuff I didn't need/want... now everything's copacetic.
|
"Bill Gates can't guarantee Windows... how can you guarantee my safety?"
-John Crichton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<King Bob On The Cob>
|
|
ever hear of "Go to Folder..." That would have been easier than using the Terminal...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Live at the BBQ
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by <King Bob On The Cob>:
<STRONG>ever hear of "Go to Folder..." That would have been easier than using the Terminal...</STRONG>
Doesn't work.
|
"Bill Gates can't guarantee Windows... how can you guarantee my safety?"
-John Crichton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|