|
|
Get ready for Video chat over Wifi ONLY on the next iPhone
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have a really strong feeling that video chat in any form on the next iPhone is going to be over wifi only.
There is no way in Hell with AT&T who just allowed VOIP and TV over 3G but still doesn't allow tethering is looking to add millions of video calls to the strained network.
Even if skype allows video calling over 3G it still has to go though Apple approval which will force this limit.
I'm not terribly disappointed as I don't think I will use it in any form much but I am just prepping those who will care.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm not so sure. I definitely wouldn't be surprised if you were right, but I think there is a chance that it'll be allowed.
If it does, I'd bet it'll be pretty crappy quality over 3G though.
|
All glory to the hypnotoad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Watch it be WiFi only in the US. The rest of the world...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
All glory to the hypnotoad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: PDX
Status:
Offline
|
|
My predictions:
I think AT&T's first priority in the US is to get tethering available for iPhones. There is a real demand for that, and its a big part of being productive on the road. Business people want it, some are even holding off getting an iPhone until they allow tethering (I know a few personally).
Video chat, on the other hand, will be a novelty in the beginning. It will most likely be low on AT&T's priority list.
And I agree with Dakar that it will be wifi in the US only, the rest of the world will get it on their cell network.
God I hate AT&T.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
People are going to argue that there are plenty of phones on the market for years that AT&T allows to work anywhere. Same issue with tethering.
Problem is those "others" must be 2% of their base and not "every damn iPhone in US of A" which would kill them.
I even have my doubts for other countries getting it right away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jokell82
Oh ya that seems like a pretty big clue. Why would you ever get the error if it could seamlessly switch on its own to 3G?
"IMAVCHAT_COULD_NOT_CONNECT_NO_REMOTE_WIFI = "The video call could not connect because a remote Wi-Fi connection could not be established.";
IMAVCHAT_DISCONNECTED_NO_LOCAL_WIFI = "The video call disconnected because the local Wi-Fi connection was lost.";"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: PDX
Status:
Offline
|
|
So is that SDK only for iPhones? Could those error messages be for the iPod touch?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ::maroma::
So is that SDK only for iPhones? Could those error messages be for the iPod touch?
True but I feel the next iPod Touch will have a camera on the back at best not both.
Or perhaps they just have one on the front to act as both normal camera and video chat in which case the error would make sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: PDX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ah, good points. I guess we shall see come WWDC. Woop!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Have you guys ever tried Skype over 3G? In my experience on a usually excellent 3G network it sucks. Latency on 3G is just way to high for VOIP to work really well. And with video it will only make things worse. Hate to say, but if Apple's worried about the user experience they'll actually block video chat over 3G on purpose.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
Have you guys ever tried Skype over 3G?
It doesn't work over 3G.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Newport News, VA USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Really? Because Verizon is pushing Skype Mobile pretty hard recently. Or were you referring to it doesn't work over 3G on the iPhone?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by cybergoober
Really? Because Verizon is pushing Skype Mobile pretty hard recently. Or were you referring to it doesn't work over 3G on the iPhone?
iPhone. It isn't fair to compare it on another phone and network.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogue SPRINKLES
iPhone. It isn't fair to compare it on another phone and network.
Why isn't it fair? If another phone and network can do something the iPhone on AT&T can't, then why should anyone give a flying flip whether it's "fair" or not. That's the competitive marketplace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Helmling
Why isn't it fair? If another phone and network can do something the iPhone on AT&T can't, then why should anyone give a flying flip whether it's "fair" or not. That's the competitive marketplace.
The point was that skype did NOT sound good over 3G on another phone and network.
He was asking if it sounded good to iPhone users over 3G which we currently not test.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogue SPRINKLES
It doesn't work over 3G.
Why do you say this? Didn't you read what I wrote? I was talking specifically about using Skype over 3G. It actually works just fine. Try Fring.
Or you tether your Mac to a 3G phone and use Skype over 3G that way. This actually gives it an advantage since Skype on a Mac has a whole lot more horsepower at its disposal than on an iPhone or other smartphone.
Bottom line: it aint pretty.
(
Last edited by Simon; Apr 30, 2010 at 03:42 AM.
Reason: typo)
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogue SPRINKLES
He was asking if it sounded good to iPhone users over 3G which we currently not test.
We actually can. I use Skype over 3G on my iPhone on an almost regular basis. And unfortunately it really doens't work well. Even on a top-notch 3G network.
Listen, I'm not trying to enter a pissing contest with you. I'm offering actual hands-on experience and I'm interested in discussing how we should extrapolate from that.
(
Last edited by Simon; Apr 30, 2010 at 03:43 AM.
Reason: another typo)
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Pretty sure sprinkles was talking about Skype *video*, which would be relevant to the topic.
|
All glory to the hypnotoad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, voice isn't great so why would video be any better?
Last time I tried a Skype video chat over 3G (tethered my MBP to my iPhone) I was expecting the worst and that's also pretty much what I got. Skype video chat doesn't require a lot of bandwidth, but it can't cope with the large latency you face on 3G networks.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
Why do you say this? Didn't you read what I wrote? I was talking specifically about using Skype over 3G. It actually works just fine. Try Fring.
I know exactly what you are talking about. You are saying that you are using skype over 3g using fring and you say it sucks.
What I am saying is that skype does not currently work over 3G. The reason fring "ain't pretty" is because they are sending your VOIP call through first their servers and then though skype so they are encoding your call TWICE plus adding tons of opportunities for delays. How else do you think VOIP calling worked over 3G when it wasn't allowed yet?
I did tether it to my laptop and make a 3G call using skype (not fring) and it sounded just fine. Perhaps your internet connection in your area just sucks.
Either way until a native 3G calling skype comes out we can't judge it by the workaround apps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado
Status:
Offline
|
|
Of course it'll be over WiFi only, at least with AT&T. They've said that they won't do tethering with the iPhone because they're scared of the drain that would have on their network. Let's face it: When it comes to network throughput, AT&T simply can't hold a candle to Sprint and Verizon. Why do you think that AT&T doesn't have its own version of the mifi or overdrive?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Skype video has a tendency to be crappy even on a 20/2 wired landline, so I wouldn’t expect too much from it over 3G.
Actually, that kind of goes for Skype audio, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by imitchellg5
Of course it'll be over WiFi only, at least with AT&T. They've said that they won't do tethering with the iPhone because they're scared of the drain that would have on their network. Let's face it: When it comes to network throughput, AT&T simply can't hold a candle to Sprint and Verizon. Why do you think that AT&T doesn't have its own version of the mifi or overdrive?
Femtocells are kind of like overdrive for your house.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado
Status:
Offline
|
|
Similar yes, but I don't believe those have the same sort of pull on the network.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: PDX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Lets not forget that if Apple does video chat on the iPhone it will be using iChat, not Skype. Just because Skype sucks over 3G or wifi or whatever doesn't mean that the same experience will be had using iChat. Apple may have found a way to optimize the traffic and compression to get optimal performance out of minimal bandwidth.
That being said, I still believe it will be wifi only in the beginning. I could see them waiting until they move to the next gen wireless network (4G?) to open it up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ::maroma::
Lets not forget that if Apple does video chat on the iPhone it will be using iChat, not Skype. Just because Skype sucks over 3G or wifi or whatever doesn't mean that the same experience will be had using iChat.
This holds on true a computer, so it could well be the same on mobile devices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your Anus
Status:
Offline
|
|
The USTREAM Broadcaster works over a 3G network. It looks okay at best and terrible at worst.
I think Apple allowing Verizon and T•Mobile to carry the iPhone would help here, because it would probably remove a lot of traffic from the AT&T network. Not immediately, but after a little time.
|
My sig is 1 pixel too big.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
Skype to skype calls sound totally amazing. Better than a normal land line most of the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
They do. But that's on a beefy broadband connection. Get on a bus or train, tether to a 3G phone and try it again. You'll notice a huge difference. Add that's audio. Then try video. Things only get worse.
No doubt, Apple would go with something that matches iChat rather than Skype. But you can try out the same there. I suggest you guys try tethering your Mac to a 3G phone. Get on a train or bus and try an iChat video chat over 3G. The experience unfortunately isn't nice as you'll quickly notice.
As I mentioned above, it's not so much bandwidth issues (until you drop from 3G to EDGE). I see that I require roughly 70 kBps for the video chat. I get way more than that on a decent 3G connection. The real issue is the latency (ping) though and that's an inherent problem with the way 3G networks work. It won't be until we switch to 4G LTE that we'll see latency drop significantly on cellular data networks.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
They do. But that's on a beefy broadband connection. Get on a bus or train, tether to a 3G phone and try it again. You'll notice a huge difference. Add that's audio. Then try video. Things only get worse.
Perhaps because you are fooling the phone into thinking it is on Wifi it uses codecs that are not made for 3G. When you watch youtube videos over 3G and edge they are in a lower bitrate than over wifi.
Skype needs to set a bitrate that would work well over 3G.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Again, it's not the bandwidth. The main problem is latency. Verizon Skype users complain about the same issues. This is not Skype, AT&T, or iPhone specific.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|