 |
 |
SCSI card :: Which one to choose?
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Status:
Offline
|
|
 ?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Admin Emeritus  Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Go with the ATTO. They play nicer with OS X.
tooki
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Status:
Offline
|
|
i heard it has sleep problems?
performance-wise ... are they betteR?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Rhode Island
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have a 29160N in my dual 1.25, it plays nice with everything. I do, however, boot from the ATA bus.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Admin Emeritus Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Those are both dual-channel Ultra160 SCSI, right? The performance is gonna be comparable.
tooki
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Status:
Offline
|
|
the ATTO is 64-bit/33mhz, while the adaptec is 32-bit/33mhz
would that make a difference ?
any issues with either card?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top