|
|
Proposed DoJ terms could force Apple to allow Amazon links in apps
|
|
|
|
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status:
Offline
|
|
The Department of Justice has published proposed settlement terms that could force Apple to allow apps to link to outside e-book stores. Last month, the DoJ emerged victorious against Apple in a trial over e-book price fixing. Apple was accused of conspiring with publishers to artificially inflate e-book prices, in particular with the aim of undermining Amazon's once-standard $10 pricetag for Kindle titles. Modern, high-profile e-books are usually priced closer to $13 or $14.
The DoJ's terms would require Apple to allow links to stores like Amazon and Barnes & Noble for two years. That would give people the chance to "easily compare Apple's prices with those of its competitors," the Department says, and help "reset competition to the conditions that existed before the conspiracy." Other proposed steps include cancelling e-book agreements with the five publishers involved in the conspiracy -- Hachette, HarperCollins, Macmillan, Penguin, and Simon & Schuster -- and a ban on entering new contracts for another five years. Apple would moreover be prohibited from agreements with providers of music, movies, TV shows and other content "that are likely to increase the prices at which Apple's competitor retailers may sell that content."
App Store rules currently prohibit developers from inserting links to web stores selling digital content. Apps must either use the native in-app purchase system, which gives Apple a 30 percent cut of revenue, or create a login system that downloads content automatically if people have paid for it elsewhere. The Kindle iOS app, for instance, is only useful if people have already separately bought or uploaded books.
(
Last edited by NewsPoster; Aug 2, 2013 at 11:40 AM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Status:
Offline
|
|
Wow, what a load of crap. There was a monopoly on the e-book market by Amazon before Apple got in. Allowing links in-App would be a boon for Amazon no doubt, but pretty certain Apple can argue those types of terms are not going to benefit everyone....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Suffolk, VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
What about forcing the Google Play Store with these links, or forcing Amazon with links to either store?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Is this ruling anti-competitive in its very nature ? Without equal terms being 'forced' on other retailers (Amazon!) the 'deck' would seem far from level ?
I would very much like to use iBooks but cannot find the titles ? Why is that ?
As far as I can understand nobody forced a publisher to sign with Apple... ?
It was a choice offered...
At what point do businesses lose the right to offer unique goods on their own free market terms?
(
Last edited by bobolicious; Aug 2, 2013 at 05:24 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Status:
Offline
|
|
Allow your competitors to sell on your device but not vice versa, cancel the contracts you have to actually sell books, and you can't sign new ones to sell books, music, media, etc....yeah, I'd imagine that's exactly how Amazon would've worded it for the DOJ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|