Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Mac News > Hands On: Pixelmator for iPad (iOS)

Hands On: Pixelmator for iPad (iOS)
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 9, 2015, 09:47 AM
Pixelmator for Mac is not Photoshop -- but it might as well be, for how those image editing features that it does have are powerful, and easy to use. It also might as well be for the majority of people who aren't full-time PS professionals. If your work needs Adobe Photoshop, then you know it -- and can make the decision about paying the modest subscription cost to use it. Pixelmator handles an ever-growing number of the most common image tasks that most people need, and we are particularly fans of the separate iPad version, which has recently been updated. Today, we're taking a look at that iPad version.

As you'd expect, there are many advanced features of Photoshop that are not in Pixelmator -- you're not going to extrude a 3D shape and wrap text around it -- but there are also more basic differences that can catch you out. For example, take a large image in Pixelmator and reduce its size. This is something we do a lot, and it works well, but you can't reverse it, you can't change your mind and go back -- not without loading up the original image and starting all over again (unlike the Mac version). When Pixelmator for iPad reduces the size of an image, it must do so by deleting pixels, and it does this permanently: scale the same image back up again, and it will be much blurry and pixellated.

Since we don't often play around with different sizes, it's much more common that we know exactly how big we need an image to be: we know where we're going to use it, we know whether it's going to be a tiny image here on the site, or whether it's going to be projected in a presentation. So we routinely get an image, change its size, and move on to the next. For that kind of straight-in, straight-out work, Pixelmator is fast. One small oddity: we found we can't type in the size we want on our external Bluetooth keyboard -- we have to use the on-screen keyboard for that one feature.

Still, tapping on the glass is part of why we like this app: you feel like you're manipulating images with your hands. That's especially true when you're applying any of Pixelmator's many effects: you tap one button to add noise to an image, for instance, and then you get an onscreen kind of thumbwheel, so you can specify how much of the effect you want.

Maybe we're not the biggest fans of effects: we're usually using Pixelmator to prepare an image for a specific purpose, and we've probably paid a photographer, so we're not going to dabble much with turning things into collages -- but you can. You can start with an entirely blank image, too, and start painting with your finger or a stylus as much as you fancy.

We really do not believe that cost should be a significant factor in any software decision: the primary issues are whether the apps do what you need, and whether they're good at it. The secondary issue is how much you're going to use it, and then maybe a third might be the cost. Pixelmator for iPad is very, very good at certain things, and we use it regularly, we actually enjoy using it.

That's all we need to recommend this to you, but the fact is that it is also preposterously cheap. The iPad version is just $10 on the App Store (there's also a more-powerful Mac one for $30 on the Mac App Store, also insanely cheap). As yet, the app is not available for the iPhone, but we would like to see it on the iPhone 6 Plus someday. Pixelmator requires iOS 8 on iPad or OS X 10.9.5 and later on the Mac.

Who is Pixelmator for:
Anyone with an iPad, and an image to edit.

Who is Pixelmator not for:
Professionals who really need the power of Photoshop.

-- William Gallagher (@WGallagher)
( Last edited by NewsPoster; Jan 10, 2015 at 07:01 AM. )
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: pacific northwest
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 9, 2015, 10:26 AM
Does Photoshop include the capability of handling edits on an original image that never changes, only keeping track of all the changes/edits made to the original file? If so, then Pixelmator doesn't do that. However, I just checked and if I make an image size change, I can undo the the change (cmd-Z) and go back without having to have a copy of the original file. I can do this with any change in Pixelmator. If I remember correctly, Photoshop and Illustrator have a list of edits made to a file and each one can be deleted if desired without affected the rest of the changes. Nice option and I'm sure someone uses this but as you say for the majority of users it's overkill.
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: pacific northwest
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 9, 2015, 12:18 PM
One more thing: I'm tired of writers separating so called "professionals" from everyone else. A true professional can use any tool (product, application, etc.) to generate whatever product they want to. Simply having the most expensive and extensive tool doesn't guarantee the best product. This is old style thinking. It used to be the only cameras used to produce "broadcast quality" movies cost at least tens of thousands of dollars (and more). Now movies are being shot on DSLR cameras costing
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 9, 2015, 01:14 PM
Exactly, like all those people clamoring for octo-core, multi-gigabyte desktop supercomputers... I got news for ya, you still suck at Photoshop and you still type 15 words per minute. A faster, better computer isn't going to make you any faster or better at anything, and if you can't accomplish a task with an ancient dual-core computer with 2GB of RAM, no supercomputer is going to be able to help you.

How powerful a computer is and what you, personally, are able to do with that computer are two mostly separate, mutually exclusive things. A faster computer doesn't make you any better at anything.

I like to say that a crappy carpenter constantly blames their lack of progress on not having just the right kind of hammer or just the right kind of nails, while any carpenter worth a hill of beans in the same situation could pick up a nearby rock and start getting things done.
Mike Wuerthele
Managing Editor
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 9, 2015, 01:17 PM
"Professionals" is a handy Venn diagram-like grouping for writers, but I see your point.

In the case of William's use of the word here, how would you have phrased it?
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,