Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Guillermo del Toro's going to direct The Hobbit

Guillermo del Toro's going to direct The Hobbit (Page 2)
Thread Tools
imitchellg5
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 2, 2010, 06:18 PM
 
I'd rather have a bajillion dollars spent on this than some shite Cameron flick.
     
olePigeon  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 2, 2010, 08:46 PM
 
Originally Posted by voodoo View Post
A shame del Toro isn't going to make the Hobbit - it was a fine choice. I don't really understand why financing a sure thing is so hard. Even in these times.
They spent way too much money on a movie that under delivered. Despite Lord of the Rings being mega blockbusters, MGM is still going out of business. They can't risk that kind of money on such a horrible director, which is probably why Jackson is being relegated to producer.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
The Final Dakar
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 2, 2010, 09:31 PM
 
Originally Posted by olePigeon View Post
They can't risk that kind of money on such a horrible director, which is probably why Jackson is being relegated to producer.
That's a nice little story, but I'm sure it has more to do with the final terms of that lawsuit than their supposed opinion of a guy who made them money hand over fist on that other trilogy.
     
Ω
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 3, 2010, 06:01 AM
 
In the heart.
"angels bleed from the tainted touch of my caress"
     
olePigeon  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 3, 2010, 11:36 AM
 
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar View Post
... opinion of a guy who made them money hand over fist on that other trilogy.
Which is why they're still going out of business?
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
The Final Dakar
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 3, 2010, 11:39 AM
 
Originally Posted by olePigeon View Post
Which is why they're still going out of business?
You really think the TLOR Trilogy put them out business?
     
voodoo
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 3, 2010, 12:28 PM
 
Originally Posted by olePigeon View Post
They spent way too much money on a movie that under delivered. Despite Lord of the Rings being mega blockbusters, MGM is still going out of business. They can't risk that kind of money on such a horrible director, which is probably why Jackson is being relegated to producer.
Lord of the Rings underdelivered? OK first of all New Line is a subsidiary of Warner, not MGM and is in fact in no way related to MGM.

So if Lord of the Rings did good, bad or just average it has no bearing on MGM.

I guess they got the rights for the Hobbit, but as an investment or production company MGM has no connection to the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Whatsoever.
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
     
olePigeon  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 3, 2010, 01:21 PM
 
I reject your reality and insert my own.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
The Final Dakar
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 3, 2010, 01:28 PM
 
You're pathetic.
     
olePigeon  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 3, 2010, 01:53 PM
 
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar View Post
You're pathetic.
Yeah, pretty much.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
Stogieman
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 3, 2010, 02:26 PM
 
Originally Posted by Dakar the Fourth View Post
Episode III was so bad...
Looks like the MacNN filters replaced the "ass" part with three periods.


Slick shoes?! Are you crazy?!
     
The Final Dakar
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 3, 2010, 02:30 PM
 
Originally Posted by Stogieman View Post
Looks like the MacNN filters replaced the "ass" part with three periods.

     
Oisín
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 3, 2010, 02:31 PM
 
^ You were meaning to say, “Do not want!”, surely?
     
The Final Dakar
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 3, 2010, 02:34 PM
 
That's my intent. While I must admit that the above pic would not communicate such a thought as clearly as I would like, the opportunity to post such an iconic pic which connects so well to the subject of that post proved too difficult to pass up.
     
olePigeon  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 3, 2010, 03:41 PM
 
(assuming it hotlinks)
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
residentEvil
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Detroit
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 8, 2010, 12:23 PM
 
Originally Posted by imitchellg5 View Post
I'd rather have a bajillion dollars spent on this than some shite Cameron flick.
he is "redoing" Titanic for a new 3D release. W.T.F.
     
The Final Dakar
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 25, 2010, 02:33 PM
 
     
turtle777
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 16, 2010, 05:18 PM
 
Well, Toro is out, Peter Jackson is back.

Start if production is planned for early 2011.
2 parts, filmed in 3D.



-t
     
voodoo
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 18, 2010, 01:50 PM
 
3D? well then I MUST see it!!!!!!1111

(or just pay less and enjoy the same movie in great 2D)

choices choices.
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
     
Shaddim
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 46 & 2
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 18, 2010, 04:34 PM
 
FFS, not Jackson again.
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
- Thomas Paine
     
turtle777
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 18, 2010, 04:43 PM
 
Originally Posted by Shaddim View Post
FFS, not Jackson again.
If you didn't like a Jackson LOTR, what makes you think you'd love a del Toro Hobbit ?

-t
     
olePigeon  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 18, 2010, 05:48 PM
 
Del Toro is doing At the Mountain of Madness, which I think is a much better choice.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
Shaddim
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 46 & 2
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 18, 2010, 05:51 PM
 
Because I like del Toro's direction and not Jackson's. If del Toro had directed LotR it would have been breathtaking, like Pan's Labyrinth with 10x more budget. That was my hope for The Hobbit.
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
- Thomas Paine
     
olePigeon  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 18, 2010, 05:58 PM
 
Originally Posted by Shaddim View Post
Because I like del Toro's direction and not Jackson's. If del Toro had directed LotR it would have been breathtaking, like Pan's Labyrinth with 10x more budget. That was my hope for The Hobbit.
Ditto.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
sek929
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 18, 2010, 06:16 PM
 
3D? God-dammit!

3D is uncomfortable and adds nothing to the movie experience, I am so sick of this 3D gimmick.
     
The Final Dakar
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 18, 2010, 06:18 PM
 
I have yet to see a movie in 3D.

(Though it's likely to be jackass this weekend)
     
sek929
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 18, 2010, 06:59 PM
 
You are not missing much.
     
The Final Dakar
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 18, 2010, 07:10 PM
 
Just an entire dimension.
     
olePigeon  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 18, 2010, 09:10 PM
 
Pfft. I'm waiting for 4D movies.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
Brien
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 18, 2010, 10:47 PM
 
3D is here to stay. :/

Glad to hear the movies are finally moving into production, though.
     
11011001
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Up north
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2010, 04:02 AM
 
Originally Posted by olePigeon View Post
Pfft. I'm waiting for 4D movies.
Well technically....
     
ghporter
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2010, 06:43 AM
 
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar View Post
I have yet to see a movie in 3D.

(Though it's likely to be jackass this weekend)
The only "modern" 3D movie I've seen yet was "UP!" and while it didn't take much time to get used to it, the process wasn't exactly convenient. I haven't seen a live-action film that offered 3D yet, and I haven't seen a title that made me want to go out of the way to see it in 3D either.

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
andi*pandi
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2010, 11:54 AM
 
Movies with flying really benefit from 3D. How to Train your Dragon, and Guardians of Gahoole both had stunning sequences that 3D really made even better.
     
olePigeon  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2010, 11:56 AM
 
I ware glasses, so I hate 3D. I don't know if it's how my lenses are made or what, but when I use the 3D LCD glasses, all that happens is that it's not very 3D, the screen just flickers, and I get a monster of a headache by the time the film ended.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
The Final Dakar
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2010, 11:57 AM
 
Originally Posted by ghporter View Post
The only "modern" 3D movie I've seen yet was "UP!" and while it didn't take much time to get used to it, the process wasn't exactly convenient. I haven't seen a live-action film that offered 3D yet, and I haven't seen a title that made me want to go out of the way to see it in 3D either.
Yes, but I'm still young, hip, and completely devoid of discernible taste. I'm supposed to be drawn to this gimmicky bullshit like a dog's nose to an ass. You're supposed grouse and complain that the only movie worth making in 3D is Patton.
     
ort888
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your Anus
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2010, 01:48 PM
 
Jackass 3D was the first 3D movie I've seen that made good use of the tech.

The 3D was awesome because they were shameless about it... launching dildos at the screen and what-not. That's how to do it.

My sig is 1 pixel too big.
     
ghporter
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2010, 08:05 PM
 
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar View Post
Yes, but I'm still young, hip, and completely devoid of discernible taste. I'm supposed to be drawn to this gimmicky bullshit like a dog's nose to an ass. You're supposed grouse and complain that the only movie worth making in 3D is Patton.
Patton would have been great in 3D, but I'd have preferred to see 2001: A Space Odyssey in 3D a lot more.

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Brien
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2010, 09:04 PM
 
Oh, yes. But not converted. Ugh.

Speaking of which...
ThinkGeek :: Monolith Action Figure
     
 
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:04 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,