|
|
What if IE6 rocks?
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Status:
Offline
|
|
IMO OS X has the best choices for browsing the web. I used to us Omniweb as my main browser, until Chimera 0.5 was released. I only use IE when the others have trouble handling a site properly. Most likely the site is not following standards.
I do wonder, with all of the great choices we have, what will be the OS X communities response to MS if IE6 rocks.
As a side thought, do we need IE6 to be successful to keep MS involved with OS X?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: sj ca
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by jcopeland:
IMO OS X has the best choices for browsing the web. I used to us Omniweb as my main browser, until Chimera 0.5 was released. I only use IE when the others have trouble handling a site properly. Most likely the site is not following standards.
I basically follow the same usage pattern, regardless of the fact that IE in general has the highest success rate rendering pages.
Mainly I avoid IE for political reasons. In some ways, that's kind of stupid because it's a tool (not a cause) and it works well. But I figure that if I don't use IE for a bad reason, that will help to balance out the users who have to use it for a bad reason (ie monopoly). So maybe not so stupid .
Anyway, I won't be using IE6 no matter what, for the aforementioned reason.
In some ways it's too bad that we can't support MS when they do good work (most of their Mac stuff, IMHO) because then we'd also be supporting their bad habits.
But that's just me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: dark side of the moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
if ie6 rocks, great. i dont like microsoft anymore then the next guy, but i am not going to shrug off well written software.
then again microsoft rarely if ever has truely well written software.
just because it might rock, doesnt mean i will use it. ie will always be my last resort, and for that reason its good to have. i will remain a happy omniweb/chimera user
|
There's someone in my head but its not me...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
it'd be great if IE 6 is fabulous, but the cool browsers have raised my standards.
here's what I've come to expect in a web browser:
1. tabbed browsing
2. advanced cookie management
3. pop-up blocking
4. image/host/ad blocking
5. javascript block/allow flexibility (such as exists in Moz.).
I just won't (and don't) use any version of IE on a regular basis without those features. it has become a browser of last resort, rather than a preference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Somewhere, but not here.
Status:
Offline
|
|
but if the rumor mill is to be believed, there will not be an ie6 for mac.....(not that i personally believe the rumor mill.....and i am a mozilla and/or omniweb user myself anyway)
|
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
if it truly rocks I'll use it. I hate M$ just as much if not more then most anyone else here but back in the early days of OS X (beta -> 10.1/OW4.1 late SP's) I used IE as it was (sadly) the best browser of the time.
|
The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it always to be kept alive.
- Thomas Jefferson, 1787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Evansville, IN
Status:
Offline
|
|
I will use whatever browser is the best. I have jumped around b/w Chimera, Omni, and IE for months. I dont care about politics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GUI Punk
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: S.E. Mitten
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by fulmer:
it'd be great if IE 6 is fabulous, but the cool browsers have raised my standards.
here's what I've come to expect in a web browser:
1. tabbed browsing
Oh thats gonna cost you, the wrath of Guy Incognito is about to come down on you like the flames of hell.
|
24" AlumiMac 2.4ghz C2D, 4g Ram, 300g HD, 750g USBHD • 80g iPod • 160g ATV • iPhone 3g
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
If IE 6 rocks, then we'll probably consider using it.
I wouldn't hold my breath, though.
BTW, this is a really stupid thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Sorry, but two things that IE will probably never ever have are pop-up blocking and image (ad) blocking. Other browsers can get away with these features owing to their relatively small userbase, but MS would cause an uproar if they introduced these features into IE as it would effectively kill advertising and the "free" web. Advanced cookie management is also unlikely IMO for similar reasons.
Without them though, IE will never "rock" which is a very good thing for the alternative browsers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Germany
Status:
Offline
|
|
I will never use IE - just because it is a MS Program. It's not a tool it's a trojan horse to "embrace and extend" web standards.
This ist why i don't believe, that IE will be on Mac OS as good as on Windows.
MS: "You want a good internet eXPerience? Use Windows - with the good IE, Paladium, DRM and .NET."
Microsofts interests aren't my interests. I don't want a DRM crippled computer, i don't want a monopoly to be able to control the tools i use.
I think open standards are the way to go and using open standards will result in a better computing world for everyone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Zadian:
It's not a tool it's a trojan horse to "embrace and extend" web standards.
fyi, IE 5:Mac is one of the best, standards compliant browsers ever, even better than IE6:Windows. So...it does 'embrace' web standards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Germany
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by godzookie2k:
fyi, IE 5:Mac is one of the best, standards compliant browsers ever, even better than IE6:Windows. So...it does 'embrace' web standards.
IE PC isn't that standard compliant and that's the web browser the web pages are made for.
And i think that sooner or later the standard compliance of IE 5:Mac will be extended by some proprietary MS features. Maybe better integration of .NET or something like that.
That's what MS always did and always will do.
I don't trust Microsoft - even if they give me presents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by swiz:
Oh thats gonna cost you, the wrath of Guy Incognito is about to come down on you like the flames of hell.
Hehe...nah, I've come to accept that there are some people in this world that like this blasphemous UI element.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Menands, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
No Microsoft products on my computers until they grow up and quit acting like a bunch of thugs. This should be about the time that hell freezes over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Norway
Status:
Offline
|
|
What if IE6 rocks?
what if the sky fell down and hit us on the head?
Well none of the possibillities is likely to occur... wait and see
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
I use Chimera, and very rarely, Internet Explorer. I'd go back to IE if it was like IE under OS 9 (FAST). It's ok under OS X, but Chimera is just too damn fast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Capital city of the Empire State.
Status:
Offline
|
|
IE6 doesn't rock on Windows XP, so why should it rock on OS X?
|
/mal
"I sentence you to be hanged by the neck until you cheer up."
MacBook Pro 15" w/ Mac OS 10.8.2, iPhone 4S & iPad 4th-gen. w/ iOS 6.1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
...then they'll be having snowball fights in hell.
|
All Your Signature Are Belong To Us!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Montreal, Qc
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by malvolio:
IE6 doesn't rock on Windows XP, so why should it rock on OS X?
Because Office X is way better than Offiice XP
On Windows I use to use Netscape Navigator but when I switched to a mac 2 years ago....I became accustom to using IE, so I just can't use any other browser now...I get "IE sick" So I eagerly wait for IE 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Portland, Oregon
Status:
Offline
|
|
If it rocks, I'll use it. However I highly doubt that it will rock. MS has had 2 years (since public beta) to get IE for OSX cleaned up and has done a horrible job at it. It's slow and it crashes a lot. They really should be embarrassed by it. It's such a shame because IE 5 in OS 9 was a VERY solid browser.
I've been a strict mozilla user in OSX, however, since around the time it reached version 0.9, and it would take a seriously kick ass browser to make me change. I was hopeful about chimera, however that project appears to have died since the main developer got hired at apple and joined the mozilla "Phoenix" project (currently windows and linux only). I just wish they'd port phoenix to X, as it is simply the best browser i have EVER used for ANY platform. And (Get this) it actually has PREFERENCES!!! OH MY GOD!!!! (unlike chimera, which is about as customizable as textedit) And it also already has some great extensions, such as mouse gestures (couldnt live without em), and VERY customizable options for tab behavior.
I will remain hopeful...
|
everything you know is wrong (and stupid)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Died? Uh, have you seen the latest nightlies? They're almost up to version 0.6, and it's better than ever. There are a lot more preferences, too. I've used a build of Phoenix for OS X, and it just feels like Chimera without the Macness. The one thing I'd like to see is mouse gestures, but that's simply not possible without all the XUL/XBL baggage which we don't want.
|
[vash:~] banana% killall killall
Terminated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Seattle
Status:
Offline
|
|
Even if it rocked, you'd then be helping MS make their proprietary web stuff "standard".
(which is bad)
~BS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: somewhere in ohio
Status:
Offline
|
|
So when is this fabled long overdue browser update supposed to happen?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by godzookie2k:
fyi, IE 5:Mac is one of the best, standards compliant browsers ever, even better than IE6:Windows. So...it does 'embrace' web standards.
Yeh, shame about the fact that it is as slow as a dead parrot and the spinning beachballs. I do use it for checking my sites though, make sure they look ok.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Feb 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Gul Banana:
The one thing I'd like to see is mouse gestures, but that's simply not possible without all the XUL/XBL baggage which we don't want. [/B]
go to www.bitart.com and download Cocoa Gestures, then you can have gestures in ANY cocoa based app. I have it and it works very well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|