Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Political/War Lounge > Strategic Petroleum Reserve : Interesting

Strategic Petroleum Reserve : Interesting
Thread Tools
ghost_flash
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 01:22 PM
 
Clinton, just prior to election had opened the reserves to lower prices.... huh.

Bush, is not.

--------------

Send thee to the Political Forum! (lol)
...
     
voodoo
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 01:23 PM
 
Wrong forum!
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
     
voodoo
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 01:43 PM
 
Interesting topic ghost_flash. Now that it is in the correct forum.

Could you provide a link to this information
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
     
OldManMac
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: I don't know anymore!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 01:55 PM
 
Bush shouldn't open the strategic reserves. It's labeled "strategic reserves" for a reason. If it were opened, it would be a very short term fix, like putting a band aid on a gash, and we would be in deep doo doo if there were an emergency.

We all complain about "high" gas prices, yet we're not willing to do even the simplest things to conserve oil, such as keeping our tires inflated to proper pressure, organizing trips, and, pretending that we need AWD vehicles to go to the grocery store.

BTW, Hummer H2 sales are dropping.
Why is there always money for war, but none for education?
     
dreilly1
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Rochester, NY, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 01:58 PM
 
I'll stick up for g_f, since I remember when this happened, and wasn't very pleased by it.

http://people.howstuffworks.com/question478.htm

The only good thing about Clinton's program was that oil companies had to replace the oil they took from the reserve, resulting in no net loss. (I remember that they might have actually had to put more oil back, but that detail isn't in this write-up.) Of course, they got to sell the oil when the price was highest, and probably replace it when it oil prices were lower, effectively pocketing the difference. We usually expect that kind of corporate welfare from Mr. Bush, but we can take solace in the fact that Mr. Clinton isn't connected in the oil industry, and likely didn't profit directly from it.

While it did make oil prices go down that winter (and I think Clinton was more after heating oil than gasoline with this program), I thought it was an improper use of this reserve. It was established to keep the economy afloat in the event of another oil embargo. If you want a reserve to keep prices stable, keep a separate reserve for that! Or, better yet, force the oil companies to maintain it, since they'd be the ones directly benefitting for it. having more oil to sell just at the point when prices are highest...

Member of the the Stupid Brigade! (If you see Sponsored Links in any of my posts, please PM me!)
     
voodoo
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 02:34 PM
 
Originally posted by ghost_flash:
Clinton, just prior to election had opened the reserves to lower prices.... huh.

Bush, is not.

--------------

Send thee to the Political Forum! (lol)
Idiotic logic.

Clinton was not up for re-election.
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
     
djohnson
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 02:36 PM
 
Anyone know how many gallons are in the SPR?
     
voodoo
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 02:42 PM
 
Originally posted by djohnson:
Anyone know how many gallons are in the SPR?
The reserve stores about 570 million barrels of crude oil in underground salt caverns at four sites along the Gulf of Mexico. A barrel contains 42 gallons or 159 liters of oil.

According to that article dreilly1 linked to.
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
     
lil'babykitten
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Herzliya
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 03:03 PM
 
Originally posted by voodoo:
Idiotic logic.
I thought Logic was your friend!
     
voodoo
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 03:13 PM
 
Originally posted by lil'babykitten:
I thought Logic was your friend!
Who is this Logic you speak of?
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
     
lil'babykitten
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Herzliya
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 03:20 PM
 
Originally posted by voodoo:
Who is this Logic you speak of?
Ya know, the one who posts h.....oh.
     
itai195
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cupertino, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 03:29 PM
 
Originally posted by dreilly1:
I'll stick up for g_f, since I remember when this happened, and wasn't very pleased by it.

http://people.howstuffworks.com/question478.htm

The only good thing about Clinton's program was that oil companies had to replace the oil they took from the reserve, resulting in no net loss. (I remember that they might have actually had to put more oil back, but that detail isn't in this write-up.) Of course, they got to sell the oil when the price was highest, and probably replace it when it oil prices were lower, effectively pocketing the difference. We usually expect that kind of corporate welfare from Mr. Bush, but we can take solace in the fact that Mr. Clinton isn't connected in the oil industry, and likely didn't profit directly from it.
Corporate Welfare is Bill Clinton's middle name (you may have thought it was Jefferson).
     
voodoo
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 03:30 PM
 
Originally posted by lil'babykitten:
Ya know, the one who posts h.....oh.
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
     
voodoo
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 03:31 PM
 
Originally posted by itai195:
Corporate Welfare is Bill Clinton's middle name (you may have thought it was Jefferson).
I thought every president was given that middle name at the inauguration?

I'm rather disillusioned, so you'll have to pardon me.
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
     
dreilly1
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Rochester, NY, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 03:35 PM
 
Originally posted by itai195:
Corporate Welfare is Bill Clinton's middle name (you may have thought it was Jefferson).
Quite true. But energy companies are Bush's specialty. Clinton's talents lay elsewhere...

Member of the the Stupid Brigade! (If you see Sponsored Links in any of my posts, please PM me!)
     
itai195
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cupertino, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 03:52 PM
 
Originally posted by voodoo:
I thought every president was given that middle name at the inauguration?

I'm rather disillusioned, so you'll have to pardon me.
Harsh, but fair
     
djohnson
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 03:54 PM
 
Originally posted by voodoo:
The reserve stores about 570 million barrels of crude oil in underground salt caverns at four sites along the Gulf of Mexico. A barrel contains 42 gallons or 159 liters of oil.

According to that article dreilly1 linked to.
Oops, didnt have time to read the article... so about 23.9 billion gallons of crude oil. How many gallons of gas would that be?

Here is a funny read http://www.geocities.com/arcticreds/gas.html
     
tie
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 07:14 PM
 
Originally posted by ghost_flash:
Clinton, just prior to election had opened the reserves to lower prices.... huh.

Bush, is not.
Bush supported Enron against the state of California. This doesn't surprise me.
     
TheMosco
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: MA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 08:31 PM
 
I am pretty sure bush senior opened it up too, but i was probably 5 or 6 years old so i wouldn't remember. Not sure if it was near an election though.

On Abc world news they said at current levels, it would last us about a month.
( Last edited by TheMosco; May 18, 2004 at 09:11 PM. )
AXP
ΔΣΦ
     
slow moe
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 18, 2004, 09:13 PM
 
Economic growing pains.

The US economy has grown while we fight a war in the middle east. The price of everything was bound to go up because everything requires petroleum to either produce, maintain, or ship.

Dipping into the strategic reserves is not the right anwser. If anything, just wait for the market to correct itself, and who knows, hybrid cars may start springing up in a driveway near you.
Lysdexics have more fnu.
     
djohnson
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 19, 2004, 12:03 PM
 
I still say we need to develop some alternative sources of power. How cool would it be to have an anti-gravity device?
     
MacGorilla
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Retired
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 19, 2004, 12:23 PM
 
People in Congress have proposed released 30 million barrels from the reserve. That's not much oil; maybe a week's consumption. It would be nice symbolism but it wouldn't do much for energy prices in the long term.
Power Macintosh Dual G4
SGI Indigo2 6.5.21f
     
BRussell
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Rockies
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 19, 2004, 12:41 PM
 
I think everyone agrees it's pretty silly. They're just looking for Bush to say "no," and then have a way of blaming Bush for gas prices. That's politics. And it might work.
     
soul searching
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Stuck in 19*53
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 19, 2004, 03:28 PM
 
Nothing funny about $2+ per gallon gas prices, but the picture below got a laugh out of me.


A gas station owner in Menlo Park, Calif., expresses his opinion on the recent surge in gasoline prices. - USA TODAY Article.

"I think of lotteries as a tax on the mathematically challenged." -- Roger Jones
     
slow moe
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 19, 2004, 11:03 PM
 
"No blood for oil! No blood for oil! No blood for.."

What! two fifty a gallon!!

"Kill! Kill! Kill!"
Lysdexics have more fnu.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:00 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,