|
|
Most Stable OS X so far?
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hollywood, Ca
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm clean-installing OS X on my Mac because I'm gonna use it only for music right now.. using Cubase SX 1. What do you think has been the most stable OS X so far? On a clean install, 10.3 has been incredibly buggy for me, so I think I'm gonna use 10.2.8. Good idea?
I was going to post this as a question, but I thought it'd be fun as a poll to see what everything thinks. Thanks for participating.
|
My Computer: MacBook Pro 2GHz, Mac OS X 10.4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Norway (I eat whales)
Status:
Offline
|
|
10.0.x never crashed to me.
10.3.1 is the best and most stable I've ever seen so far. No crashes at all. 10.3 screwed up a little, but wasn't all that bad.
|
Sniffer gone old-school sig
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
For me Panther has been the buggiest version since 10.0.
It broke my burning capabilities, Finder is unstable (it hanged and died just on a window-resize yesterday), and there are other annoying windows/icons behavior. I've also had one kernal panic already.
|
#macnn: where all the real action is at.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In a gadda da vida.
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've been pretty lucky, been using OS X since 10.0, and now using Panther. I think in all this time it's only ever bombed out on me less than 6 times, and most of those were due to something I did to it to make it keel over.
In terms of stability, again, not sure, it's been rock solid for me so far, all versions, but I really noticed the overall speed, stability when Jaguar came out.
Now with Panther, I've not had a single problem yet, the OS itself has always been extremely stable for me, and that's a real testament to OS X; apps too have been behaving well, the odd crash here and there, still pretty rare.
I keep throwing stuff at it, and it just keeps ticking along
Got to say, after all these years, and using most OS's out there; OS X is the first OS that I've really felt completely happy working in, and feels more than just a tool to get work done; it's an environment that I spend most of my day staring at, and working in, and just feels right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
None of the have been particularly problematic for me other than the 10.2.8 update which was awful. Panther has just given X a much needed speed boost which is most welcome. Other than that, all was well anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Safe House
Status:
Offline
|
|
10.2.6 was nice. 10.2.8 I almost lost the faith but survived because I'm so anal about disk housekeeping. Panther has been solid for me so far and 10.3.1 the best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Where my body is
Status:
Offline
|
|
10.2.6 was amazingly stable. 10.3.1 is very stable so far, I will see when I have it as long as 10.2.6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Norway
Status:
Offline
|
|
10.3 and 10.3.1 has been a hell here. I didn't just do clean install, no no, it was reformat then install. Usually the Dock just crashes, and it is impossible to restart it from the Terminal, if I have it open. The apps there are already there works, but I don't get anywhere else And then things usually becomes even messier, one app at the time is gong down. Hard restart is the only option that will end it.
I also experience almost daily (just every second day or so the above), that it just relogin, no warnings, nothing, everything goes blue, then it logs me in again, but everything that was open i gone, and if not saved, totally gone.
Crap man. I've used OS X since 10.1.4 (OS 9, 8 and 7 before that), and 10.3 and 10.3.1 (even worse) is the crappiest and most unstabile Mac OS X. I've seen Windows 98's that has less crashes.
You have some clues ?? On some updates there has been reports that a combo install fixes most stuff, but there is no combo Hopefully there will be one on 10.3.2.
|
Mac Pro 2 x 2.8 GHz Quad-Core, Nvidia GeForce 8800GT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sitting in front of computer
Status:
Offline
|
|
10.3.1 is rock solid for me.
Not one system crash. Apps seem more stable. Nice and fast. I can really see where this is going.
I have a few pet peeves, networking is a mess, it works, but it is an inconsistent mess with some stuff showing up on the desktop and some not, keychain doesn't work right with it.
Printing is still weak. It doesn't show what pages have been printed and what ones haven't. Seems to choke older postscript printers.
Overall I would say that it is almost there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
I like Panther, but I've had more problems with it than Jaguar. If you want stability, wait for Panther to mature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Macfreak7
Status:
Offline
|
|
Panther has crashed on me FOUR times already.
I can only remember one incident where it completely froze for no apparently no reason. The other times i'm not sure what happened.
So I'd have to say 10.2.6. 10.2.7 wasn't too bad either.
But lets not disregard the fact that I had a couple of "haxies" installed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Menands, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
The only kernel panic I've seen since the Public Beta came a couple of years back trying to install a new version of Norton. I think Panther is the nicest version of X, but there has been no difference in stability since the beginning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Far from the internet.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Johnny_B:
Don't make up fake quotes!
Maybe it's all that 3rd party stuff you use, like the SCSI card, or the USB card, or the flashed 8500. . .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
10.2.6 was pretty good to me. The only time I restarted was for system updates. 10.3 has been pretty aweful in comparison. I had the first hard freeze since OS9 the other day, with just photoshop and itunes open. The finder crashes and restarts every other day, just by opening my hard drive to get to a folder. And this is on a reformated and clean installed powerbook.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Retired
Status:
Offline
|
|
10.1.x was pretty buggy for me but with 10.2 and onward, not a problem.
|
Power Macintosh Dual G4
SGI Indigo2 6.5.21f
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Partying down with the Ewoks, after I nuked the Death Star!
Status:
Offline
|
|
I had a couple KP's with 10.1something and 10.2.7 on my G5. 10.3 is rock solid if not a little buggy.
|
"Hello, what have we here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Capital city of the Empire State.
Status:
Offline
|
|
I voted for 10.3.1, but really it's a tie with 10.3. Both have been just about perfect for me. No lock-ups, no kernel panics, very few app crashes.
Of course, I'm not using a theme, or haxies or anything along those lines�
|
/mal
"I sentence you to be hanged by the neck until you cheer up."
MacBook Pro 15" w/ Mac OS 10.8.2, iPhone 4S & iPad 4th-gen. w/ iOS 6.1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Norway
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by benb:
Maybe it's all that 3rd party stuff you use, like the SCSI card, or the USB card, or the flashed 8500. . .
Yeah, OS X don't like that you use your pci slots, what a shame !! And the ATi card is a PC OEM from ATi, which is the exact same card as the one to Mac. ALOT of people has a flashed R8500, but they don't have the same problems as I. I never had any problems with 10.2.
|
Mac Pro 2 x 2.8 GHz Quad-Core, Nvidia GeForce 8800GT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hollywood, Ca
Status:
Offline
|
|
I must say, I am really surprised that the majority says that Panther is the most stable! I have had numerous problems with it, and for the last 2 weeks there have been an excessive amount of apps that unexpectedly quit throughout the day, causing all my work to get lost: Soundtrack, Documents in Word, Photoshop, Site updates in DW MX 2004. It's quite unnerving. Must be something in my preferences file that is corrupted. For me, 10.2.6 was the most stable so far.
[edit: I wrote "10.1.5" was the most stable for some reason before.. I don't know why. I was thinking "10.2.6"]
(
Last edited by mikemako; Nov 26, 2003 at 07:09 AM.
)
|
My Computer: MacBook Pro 2GHz, Mac OS X 10.4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, I find this question impossible to answer - I've had maybe three or four KP's since installing 10.0, around ten to fifteen hard freezes (almost all in games - wish Apple would provide some means to force quit these damned things when they lock up the window server). Overall, I'd have to say that the 10.0.x series was the least stable but, largely, OS X has been rock solid from day one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status:
Offline
|
|
Most stable? 10.2.6. It was amazing. 10.3.1 has crashed on me twice but other than that it is pretty stable. Buggy, but stable.
|
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've had a couple things that made me reboot so far in 10.3.1... System Preferences quit responding (couldn't open it), and the screen saver password quit working.
Never had any such problems with 10.2.6. So it's not necessarily that the OS "crashed," but I was forced to reboot to regain full functionality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Amboy Navada, Canadia.
Status:
Offline
|
|
coupla problems in 10.3.1, including the cursor freezing a day or two ago. not terrible, but not welcome. no problems after 10.2.4 here, never tried 10.2.8
|
[img]broken link[/img]
This insanity brought to you by:
The French CBC, driving antenna users mad since 1937.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Trafalmadore
Status:
Offline
|
|
I haven't had any KPs or freezing with Panther, including betas going back to late July.
10.3.2 is what I am running now. To those that are having problems with Panther on a clean install, I would suspect RAM or other hardware issues. Panther seems a little pickier about RAM and I don't know why.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|