|
|
Apple Has Pulled 10.2.8 Update?
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
The Updates were availble at their web site this morning and also showing on Versiotracker. Now they are gone. Or am I mistaken?
Apple Update Downloads
|
MacBook Air, Mac OS X (10.7), 1.6 GHz, Core i5, 4GB 1333 MHz DDR3, 128 GB SSD, 24" LED ACD, 1TB Time Capsule (late 2009), IOS4 ATV, 16GB iPhone 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's been pulled per MacMinute.com
-matt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
A day after it was released, Apple quietly pulled its Mac OS X v10.2.8 update from circulation this afternoon, both from its Web site and through the Software Update system preferences pane.
Some Mac users complained that their Ethernet networking connectivity was deactivated following the software update's installation. The problem seems mainly isolated to certain Power Mac G4 models (MacCentral observed the problem directly on a Power Mac G4/500MHz configuration, for example). MacCentral received a statement from Apple late this afternoon confirming the news.
"We have temporarily removed the Mac OS X v10.2.8 software update while we resolve an issue affecting Ethernet networking on small number of Power Mac G4 desktop systems. We anticipate that the issue will be resolved soon," said the statement in its entirety.
Further details about when a new update would be posted were unavailable as MacCentral posted this article, and Apple stopped short of offering a specific remedy to correct the issue on Power Mac G4s already stricken by this problem.
Several MacCentral readers and participants of the discussion groups on Apple's own Web site have noted that it's possible to restore Ethernet connectivity on these computers by downloading the previous copy of the AppleGMACEthernet.kext file used by Mac OS X and reinstalling it, either by issuing a series of commands from the Terminal application or by rebooting the Power Mac G4 into Mac OS 9 and dragging and dropping the file into its appropriate location. Apple does not support these solutions, however, so proceed with utmost caution.
|
MacBook Air, Mac OS X (10.7), 1.6 GHz, Core i5, 4GB 1333 MHz DDR3, 128 GB SSD, 24" LED ACD, 1TB Time Capsule (late 2009), IOS4 ATV, 16GB iPhone 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Retired.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
i was at nearly 99% downloaded when they pulled it, ah well
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hell
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
All that damn testing and something as obvious as this goes unnoticed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London'ish
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Kissargi:
i was at nearly 99% downloaded when they pulled it, ah well
So like, 98% then?
|
The worst thing about having a failing memory is..... no, it's gone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Retired.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Grrr:
So like, 98% then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Agasthya:
All that damn testing and something as obvious as this goes unnoticed.
Apple tech: "Testing? Oops..."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Retired.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Agasthya:
All that damn testing and something as obvious as this goes unnoticed.
Didn't you know that all of Apple's test machines (6500's and a few 8100's) only have 56k modems in them?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: someplace
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by gorickey:
Didn't you know that all of Apple's test machines (6500's and a few 8100's) only have 56k modems in them?
An 8100 can run 10.2?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by gatorparrots:
An 8100 can run 10.2?
If the local reality distortion field is strong enough, an 8100 can run 10.2 faster than a G5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hahaha... Damn. That.. cracked me up.
Frick. I'm such a geek.
Originally posted by wataru:
If the local reality distortion field is strong enough, an 8100 can run 10.2 faster than a G5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|