|
|
Britain "Doomsday": Explosion at fuel depot shrouds southeast in black smoke -JPEG-
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Very interesting... but it isn't a doomsday explosion... but it does look nasty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Madison, WI
Status:
Offline
|
|
From what I've read on the BBC there is something like 60 million gallons of petroleum being consumed in this fire. The fire brigade is going to let most of it burn out before making an attempt at extinguishing the blaze. That makes sense.
Anecdotal and uncorroborated statements point to this being the largest peace-time explosion in Europe since the end of WWII. Also anecdotal is a statement tha the explosion was so lound it was heard across the English Channel on the continent.
That's pretty freakin' cool if you ask me. Anyway, all you Brits better start hoarding fuel.
|
One should never stop striving for clarity of thought and precision of expression.
I would prefer my humanity sullied with the tarnish of science rather than the gloss of religion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by dcmacdaddy
From what I've read on the BBC there is something like 60 million gallons of petroleum being consumed in this fire.
Anyway, all you Brits better start hoarding fuel.
Narh. It's mostly jet fuel in that depot (servicing the local airports) - won't affect daily transport needs at all.
Oh, and 60m litres, not gallons.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dead whale
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
Narh. It's mostly jet fuel in that depot (servicing the local airports) - won't affect daily transport needs at all.
I'll believe that when I see it. Oil companies have increased pump prices with less of an excuse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dead whale
Status:
Offline
|
|
That Getty guy always takes good pictures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yamanashi, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Nice pictures. Wow, it'll be interesting to see what kind of ecological impact this has in England.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
The thing is, London is already choked with massive pollution as it is. I can't see it getting any worse because of this cloud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kerrigan
The thing is, London is already choked with massive pollution as it is. I can't see it getting any worse because of this cloud.
True dat.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northamptonshire UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
On the radio today, the guy was interviewing an environmentalist, and he asked if the fire would impact on the UK's attempt to reduce CO2 emissions in line with the Kyoto Protocol.
The environmentalist said the fire would not impact on the emissions at all, since all the fuel would be burnt anyway; the only difference is that the fuel is being burnt in one go, instead of in several million cars.
The interview just highlighted how poluting cars are when you put all the emissions together...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Strix
On the radio today, the guy was interviewing an environmentalist, and he asked if the fire would impact on the UK's attempt to reduce CO2 emissions in line with the Kyoto Protocol.
The environmentalist said the fire would not impact on the emissions at all, since all the fuel would be burnt anyway; the only difference is that the fuel is being burnt in one go, instead of in several million cars.
The interview just highlighted how poluting cars are when you put all the emissions together...
That doesn't seem to make too much sense to me, because cars don't just burn it into the air – they have mechanisms to limit byproducts. I mean, I doubt the factory had a catalytic converter built-in. But maybe there's more to it than that...?
greg
|
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
Cars have mechanisms to limit byproducts, but they can't limit the exhaust of H₂O and CO₂. Those are the endproducts of the oxydation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
Of course that logic is complete idiocy, since MORE FUEL will have to be imported for car owners to burn.
You don't think people will stop driving just because some fuel tanks blow, do you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Second star to the right, and straight on till morning
Status:
Offline
|
|
That's nothing compaired to what I witnessed in Kuwait.
Virtual night.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Strix
On the radio today, the guy was interviewing an environmentalist, and he asked if the fire would impact on the UK's attempt to reduce CO2 emissions in line with the Kyoto Protocol.
The environmentalist said the fire would not impact on the emissions at all, since all the fuel would be burnt anyway; the only difference is that the fuel is being burnt in one go, instead of in several million cars.
The interview just highlighted how poluting cars are when you put all the emissions together...
What? Is he suggesting that people are going to stop using fuel for the period of time that it would have taken to use that fuel if it had not caught fire?
No! People are still going to use just as much fuel (if they can get it), and therefore the amount used over that period will be double!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northamptonshire UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
The (almost) amusing bit about this is when the Government Environment Agency delayed the fire services from putting out the fire using water and foam, because they thought the foam by polute the water supply.
60m litres of burning fuel must therefore be less poluting....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogika
Of course that logic is complete idiocy, since MORE FUEL will have to be imported for car owners to burn.
You don't think people will stop driving just because some fuel tanks blow, do you?
Since we probably won't stop burning fossil fuels until there's none less, I doubt anymore will be burned in the end by this.
|
12" Rev B PB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
Narh. It's mostly jet fuel in that depot (servicing the local airports) - won't affect daily transport needs at all.
Oh, and 60m litres, not gallons.
My local paper this morning led with the fire/explosion, and they said that a lot of Britains were panic-buying petrol for their cars. They must not have known anything but "a huge lot of petrol is burning!"
I grew up a ten minute drive from at least three such depots, and I didn't have any idea what they stored. We were close enough to Detroit Metro airport that any one of these places could have been servicing them. And frankly, it wasn't until I'd been out on my own for quite a while that I really grasped the concept of "different grades of petroleum fuels." I doubt most people ever do.
The only "bright" spot in this is that it seems to have been entirely finished products at that depot, so the smoke may be ugly, but it's not as bad as it could have been.
|
Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Manchester,UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Strix
The (almost) amusing bit about this is when the Government Environment Agency delayed the fire services from putting out the fire using water and foam, because they thought the foam by polute the water supply.
60m litres of burning fuel must therefore be less poluting....
There where worries that the chemicals from the foam could seep from local water courses in to the local water table (the whole area sits on a bed of chalk), thus poisoning the local tap water supply. With them having to use such an enormous amount of foam over a large area.
They where delayed anyway because of getting enough of the foam concentrate to the site, I doubt that any environmental worries created any extra delay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ghporter
My local paper this morning led with the fire/explosion, and they said that a lot of Britains were panic-buying petrol for their cars. They must not have known anything but "a huge lot of petrol is burning!"
No real sign of that up here (I'm central England). Most blokes (in general conversation) seem to realise that there's different grades of fuel - i.e. a difference between petrol and jet fuel.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogika
Of course that logic is complete idiocy, since MORE FUEL will have to be imported for car owners to burn.
IIRC, we're completely self-sufficient in fuel.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Strix
On the radio today, the guy was interviewing an environmentalist, and he asked if the fire would impact on the UK's attempt to reduce CO2 emissions in line with the Kyoto Protocol.
The environmentalist said the fire would not impact on the emissions at all, since all the fuel would be burnt anyway; the only difference is that the fuel is being burnt in one go, instead of in several million cars.
The interview just highlighted how poluting cars are when you put all the emissions together...
Environmentalists are usually idiots though. They'll say anything to get their lifestyle message across. For starters he must have missed the fact that the fuel wasn't destined for cars but for aircraft - and I'm betting he's not about to start foregoing his two weeks in Ibiza.
Interestingly, Clarkson said last night that new research had discovered that a cow has more effect on global warming than a Range Rover. Interesting, as I've been banging on about this for years. I'll bet the environmentalist on that radio show had a nice steak with his dinner today.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
IIRC, we're completely self-sufficient in fuel.
I realize that "imported" might not have been the best choice of word.
But "self-sufficiency" is rather odd for something that's culled from the depths of the North Sea, and besides, that wasn't my point.
Claiming there is no net increase in pollution since the fuel was going to be burned anyway is rather silly, unless of course you're seeing it in relation to the absolute finite nature of fossil fuels...so yeah, in light of the next 50 years, when oil runs out, it won't make a difference.
But this year, it's an extra X million litres of fuel being burned (since people aren't driving any less).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogika
But this year, it's an extra X million litres of fuel being burned (since people aren't flying any less).
Correctinated. Very little car fuel at that depot.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
Either way, my pint stands, right?
(that there was a typo, but a much better idea than arguing on the internet. Cheers! )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogika
Either way, my pint stands, right?
I thought you were on litres over there?
Originally Posted by analogika
(that there was a typo, but a much better idea than arguing on the internet. Cheers! )
Yep.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: So-Cal
Status:
Offline
|
|
Dang... But you know ... i wonder if there are high resolution versions of those pictures. They would make awesome wallpaper. =)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: With my kitties!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Uh oh, here comes the "nuclear winter"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
Interestingly, Clarkson said last night that new research had discovered that a cow has more effect on global warming than a Range Rover. Interesting, as I've been banging on about this for years. I'll bet the environmentalist on that radio show had a nice steak with his dinner today.
Yep. Cows make methane (from BOTH ends), while the gasses a Range Rover puts out are CO2, CO and various nitrous oxides (most of which combine with natural environmental chemicals and settle out as nitrates that help the soil-but not enough to be a selling point ). Methane by itself is much more heat-trapping than CO2, while CO seems to have no greenhouse effect as it reacts with other chemicals and adds carbon that settles out into the environment.
Interestingly, a car can burn methane creating CO2 and water vapor-and only a small amount of CO2 at that. But again, I don't think "run your car on cow farts" would be a good selling point.
|
Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Those are aweome pictures, thanks for posting. My wife has a friend who's father works for that company. Very sad.
|
"Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never - in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense." Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
No real sign of that up here (I'm central England).
Doofy, quick question, and this is way off topic: Are there a lot of other conservatives like yourself in the midlands? I've always wondered where the Tories live.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Up north
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Strix
On the radio today, the guy was interviewing an environmentalist, and he asked if the fire would impact on the UK's attempt to reduce CO2 emissions in line with the Kyoto Protocol.
The environmentalist said the fire would not impact on the emissions at all, since all the fuel would be burnt anyway; the only difference is that the fuel is being burnt in one go, instead of in several million cars.
The interview just highlighted how poluting cars are when you put all the emissions together...
That's a stupid explanation.
The fuel was going to be used in the future, but planes aren't going to stop flying, therefore this is not going to have much impact on fuel consumption. Which means that an extra 60 million liters of fuel was just burned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ghporter
The only "bright" spot in this is that it seems to have been entirely finished products at that depot, so the smoke may be ugly, but it's not as bad as it could have been.
You are right. Cancer will occur dramatically in 20 years instead of 2.
|
"Criticism is a misconception: we must read not to understand others but to understand ourselves.”
Emile M. Cioran
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kerrigan
Doofy, quick question, and this is way off topic: Are there a lot of other conservatives like yourself in the midlands?
To the west of me there's none - just about the safest Labour seat in the country, has been solid Labour since WWII. Labour could put a rosette on a pineapple and folks would vote for it.
To the east of me there's loads of very sensible Tories.
Originally Posted by Kerrigan
I've always wondered where the Tories live.
Clue: To the west of me it's urban, to the east it's rural.
(
Last edited by Doofy; Dec 12, 2005 at 11:11 PM.
)
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Life in British cities has gotten so unpleasant, it's no wonder the conservatives have moved out. The odd thing about it, is that when you get used to all the crime and the rudeboys and the depressing reconstruction-era buildings, you don't want to leave.
The only city dwelling tories I know are my lucky friends from boarding schools like Harrow or Fettes. Apart from that, I never bump into any conservatives, ever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kerrigan
Life in British cities has gotten so unpleasant, it's no wonder the conservatives have moved out. The odd thing about it, is that when you get used to all the crime and the rudeboys and the depressing reconstruction-era buildings, you don't want to leave.
Once you've lowered your standards sufficiently, you mean.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: -
Status:
Offline
|
|
Happened here too during forest fires... sky was smoky RED.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: With my kitties!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ghporter
Cows make methane (from BOTH ends)...
Uh, so do humans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Michigan, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Dale Sorel
Uh, so do humans
A single cow produces around 600 litres of methane per day. I've never measured my own gas output but I know it's nowhere close, even after scarfing down a grab bag of bean burritos from Taco Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: London
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
Once you've lowered your standards sufficiently, you mean.
Or opened your mind just wide enough to tolerate living around people different to yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by nath
Or opened your mind just wide enough to tolerate living around people different to yourself.
Are you stalking me or what?
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: A battlefield
Status:
Offline
|
|
I saw something like that when flying to Australia recently, but was far more extreme. We were coming into land at KL, Malaysia when people on board could smell something strange. As we got nearer to Kuala Lumpur, the odour was pretty intense to the point some were wondering if it was the plane. Folks were fairly calm but as soon as we landed we realized it wasn't the plane but the entire city, covered in smoke.
Turns out Indonesia was doing its usual forest burning exercises in which so much smoke is thrown into the air it actually reaches Malaysia and blankets it in this polluted mess. Couldn't see 5 feet in front of me until we reached the terminals.
Still, was amazing to see.
(
Last edited by Insurgent; Dec 14, 2005 at 09:13 AM.
)
|
Tonight may have to last me the rest of my life.
uruknet - the real news from Iraq.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status:
Offline
|
|
I live in reading, west of London, about the same distance away from the blast as london and the smoke was over us as well - pretty odd feeling, I can tell you.
Also, this is the best image of it that I've seen so far,
|
Macbook Pro 15" Rev: Feb08
iPhone & iPod Touch
20" iMac G5, Mac Mini G4 and an iBook G4, all retired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|