|
|
What you should do if you had ALL the money?
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UKland
Status:
Offline
|
|
So effectively apple has all the money. In brief that's 178$billion in the bank and continuing revenue of 70 odd billion $ every 3 months. That's quite a lot of cash. They make over 30% margin on every iPhone and the rest of their stuff isn't too far being that. In short they are as they say, cash rich.
Now, over in china the people making Apples stuff are paid the standard wage, I guess since they actually work for Foxconn they get paid the same when they are nailing together iPhones as they do when they make Samsung tablets etc. But I'm guessing Apple have some hefty leverage, even if recent documentaries have shown that they only impose this in a patchy and haphazard way. While I would say that Apple is amongst the better companies for worker rights etc, in reality it's still not stellar.
So, what's to stop them talking some action, and thinking different about this? If they were to commandeer (i.e. pay) to take over entire facilities in china and, say, pay their workers double, really get into working conditions, have properly committed worker education programmes and health care etc. Would that hurt their bottom line materially. I would guess not.
Should they do this? If you can materially lift up thousands of people, treat them with the same respect you give to the hipster employees segwaying to the company juice lounge in Cupertino, should you?
|
This space for Hire! Reasonable rates. Reach an audience of literally dozens!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Just west of DC.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Pay and respect are too different things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Isle of Manhattan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Apple should buy Microsoft then completely dissolve it, everything - desks, water coolers... leave millions of MS users out in the cold.
As for the workers in China - I agree with a better quality of life and increased pay for them - it's a shithole there and I've seen it for myself. But do realize that Apple is a business and is obligated to stockholders to make more money than it did in the previous quarter.
If you increase cost of manufacturing/benefits for the workers, that cost difference will either come out of profits (never going to happen) or increased prices (then the hipsters and everyone else will whine).
My solution: send all the hipsters to China, make them work.
|
"Faster, faster! 'Till the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death." - HST
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UKland
Status:
Offline
|
|
My feeling is it should come out of profits. It's the human thing to do and to have it enshrined in law as it is in the U.S., that a company's first and only legal obligation to its shareholders is to maximise profits is inhuman and leads to inhuman behavior.
I realise I live in a fantasy world here.
|
This space for Hire! Reasonable rates. Reach an audience of literally dozens!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Across from the wallpaper store.
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't think that Apple is under any moral obligation to do anything. The workers at Foxconn and similar places have been given a choice where none had existed before. Without these jobs they are back on the farm living in real poverty. People flock to the cities to work for a reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Isle of Manhattan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Your feelings are true to the heart, but...
A negative/positive of capitalism is that you don't have to give anything to anyone except the tax man - and even that is somewhat negotiable.
But nothing is preventing Apple from dumping 10 billion to better the lives of people. It's a nice idea, and I agree in spirit - I'd prefer to see this applied to all children of the world, not just workers in China. Then the sick adults, etc... then the workers could be given care packages.
|
"Faster, faster! 'Till the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death." - HST
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Shaddim's sock drawer
Status:
Offline
|
|
Changing the world around you doesn't start with a company doing more with their profits (though that is nice when it happens), it's starts with you doing all that you can with what you have. Moral behavior isn't measured by how much others give to those in need, it's measured by what you do with what you have, because that changes you and your perceptions in fundamental ways. The "fantasy world" you live in starts to turn into reality very quickly.
|
"I have a dream, that my four little children will one day live in a
nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin,
but by the content of their character." - M.L.King Jr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Isle of Manhattan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by smacintush
I don't think that Apple is under any moral obligation to do anything. The workers at Foxconn and similar places have been given a choice where none had existed before. Without these jobs they are back on the farm living in real poverty. People flock to the cities to work for a reason.
I agree... These huge factories provide an opportunity to escape utter poverty. Our idea of poor is utter luxury compared to the average Chinese citizen. Unless you've been there, you can't imagine what it's like.
Communism is a horrid and failed system, spending time in mainland China will reveal how poor the country really is. The commie leaders who made the deals with the west profit, yet leave their own to suffer. Odd.
|
"Faster, faster! 'Till the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death." - HST
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Across from the wallpaper store.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by osiris
Your feelings are true to the heart, but...
A negative/positive of capitalism is that you don't have to give anything to anyone except the tax man - and even that is somewhat negotiable.
But nothing is preventing Apple from dumping 10 billion to better the lives of people. It's a nice idea, and I agree in spirit - I'd prefer to see this applied to all children of the world, not just workers in China. Then the sick adults, etc... then the workers could be given care packages.
None of that would make a dent. All projects like that do is give short term relief to a relative few people and assuage some unearned guilt on the part of the benefactor.
What the people of China need is an idealogical education that eventually frees them from state control.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Isle of Manhattan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by smacintush
None of that would make a dent. All projects like that do is give short term relief to a relative few people and assuage some unearned guilt on the part of the benefactor.
Very true.
Originally Posted by smacintush
What the people of China need is an idealogical education that eventually frees them from state control.
The truth sets you free... China is ripe for a revolution, peaceful or otherwise.
|
"Faster, faster! 'Till the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death." - HST
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
How many hours a week does a Foxconn line worker put in, and do they get overtime?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UKland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by smacintush
I don't think that Apple is under any moral obligation to do anything. The workers at Foxconn and similar places have been given a choice where none had existed before. Without these jobs they are back on the farm living in real poverty. People flock to the cities to work for a reason.
While that's true the choice between poverty and near poverty is a hard one. Of course in that position you would choose near poverty. However, when your direct employer is sitting on the kind of money that apple is then what do you do. They pay Tim Cook so well as a way of expressing his value to Apple. Surely the same should be true of the workers who put the product together.
The second track on this is Apple's lip service to the idea of worker welfare. Yes I know they do better than some, but they have the recourses to to much much better. Their attention to worker conditions is really only the minimum that they feel they need to do, they could do so, so much better and can afford to.
Back in the 1920's the Ford company was famous for paying it's workers way above the average for manual labour. Ford saw the benefit in turning his workers into customers. What worked for him should work for apple.
|
This space for Hire! Reasonable rates. Reach an audience of literally dozens!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Is Apple expressing value, or did Cook earn it?
There's only so much value you can provide as a line worker in an oversaturated labor market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UKland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by osiris
The commie leaders who made the deals with the west profit, yet leave their own to suffer. Odd.
and yet strangely common the world over
|
This space for Hire! Reasonable rates. Reach an audience of literally dozens!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your Anus
Status:
Offline
|
|
It would be nice if they lowered some of their prices as well. I get that they are a premium product and can charge premium prices, but it would be great if they could cut the BS.
Why can't the cheap iMac be outfitted with a larger hard drive? Why does that larger hard drive cost twice as much as an aftermarket larger hard drive?
Why an upgrade of 16 gigs of flash ram $100? Why is your RAM so expensive? Stop bleeding us in these lame ways Apple.
You now have more money than some small countries. You don't need to pull these lame blatant cash grabs anymore.
EDIT: Actually, I just checked and it looks like you actually CAN now upgrade the Hard Drive in the cheaper iMac. So something changed. That's good. It used to be that if you wanted a big hard drive, you had to get the iMac with the better processor and video card. You couldn't even upgrade it unless you stepped up to the upper tier. It was hella lame.
Still, a lot of my point remains. BTO options are way overpriced.
|
My sig is 1 pixel too big.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Isle of Manhattan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doc HM
and yet strangely common the world over
I think you're on to something there.
|
"Faster, faster! 'Till the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death." - HST
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll let you know when I get there...
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ort888
It would be nice if they lowered some of their prices as well. I get that they are a premium product and can charge premium prices, but it would be great if they could cut the BS.
Why can't the cheap iMac be outfitted with a larger hard drive? Why does that larger hard drive cost twice as much as an aftermarket larger hard drive?
Why an upgrade of 16 gigs of flash ram $100? Why is your RAM so expensive? Stop bleeding us in these lame ways Apple.
You now have more money than some small countries. You don't need to pull these lame blatant cash grabs anymore.
EDIT: Actually, I just checked and it looks like you actually CAN now upgrade the Hard Drive in the cheaper iMac. So something changed. That's good. It used to be that if you wanted a big hard drive, you had to get the iMac with the better processor and video card. You couldn't even upgrade it unless you stepped up to the upper tier. It was hella lame.
Still, a lot of my point remains. BTO options are way overpriced.
They have to pay people to install the BTO options, vs you doing it yourself. There's justification for it costing more. But it is too much more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ort888
It would be nice if they lowered some of their prices as well. I get that they are a premium product and can charge premium prices, but it would be great if they could cut the BS.
Why can't the cheap iMac be outfitted with a larger hard drive? Why does that larger hard drive cost twice as much as an aftermarket larger hard drive?
Why an upgrade of 16 gigs of flash ram $100? Why is your RAM so expensive? Stop bleeding us in these lame ways Apple.
You now have more money than some small countries. You don't need to pull these lame blatant cash grabs anymore.
You realize that these small issues are partly responsible for their massive war chest.
If people are willing to pay the Apple premium, then what possible incentive would a corporation have to cut everyone a better deal?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
(
Last edited by el chupacabra; Jan 5, 2024 at 02:31 AM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|