|
|
'Golfball' on Mars
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
What is the 'golfball' in this crater on Mars?
Is it a meteor? A volcano? A buckminster-fuller geodesic dome?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Looks like a Pinnacle #2.
|
Slick shoes?! Are you crazy?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status:
Offline
|
|
God shoots a hole-in-one.
|
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Sure, we landed on the moon, and-mars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: atx, usa
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by perryp:
What is the 'golfball' in this crater on Mars?
Is it a meteor? A volcano? A buckminster-fuller geodesic dome?
it is a common morphological feature of impact craters. the center structure is caused by partially molten rock resurfacing - so similiar to a volcano, though the source is the local rocks affected by the impact and not magma from within the planet, and as such, does not have a permanent source of rock.
|
"do unto others as you would have them do unto you" begins with yrself.
"He that fights for Allah's cause fights for himself. Allah does not need His creatures' help." -koran, the spider, 29:7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by adamk:
it is a common morphological feature of impact craters. the center structure is caused by partially molten rock resurfacing - so similiar to a volcano, though the source is the local rocks affected by the impact and not magma from within the planet, and as such, does not have a permanent source of rock.
but why is this thing so regular? something to do with less gravitational forces? are there similar examples on earth or other planets/moons?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: atx, usa
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by perryp:
but why is this thing so regular? something to do with less gravitational forces? are there similar examples on earth or other planets/moons?
not sure about the regularity - that is amazing, and with the little dimples. there are good examples of a central bump in craters on the moon though.
*the bump may also be a result of uplift (decompression) after the hit. maybe some more astro-oriented people may know better.
|
"do unto others as you would have them do unto you" begins with yrself.
"He that fights for Allah's cause fights for himself. Allah does not need His creatures' help." -koran, the spider, 29:7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: atx, usa
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by ghost_flash:
Sure, we landed on the moon, and-mars.
do you think that we haven't? and if so, what proof/evidence do you have to the contrary?
|
"do unto others as you would have them do unto you" begins with yrself.
"He that fights for Allah's cause fights for himself. Allah does not need His creatures' help." -koran, the spider, 29:7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: San Antonio
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by adamk:
do you think that we haven't? and if so, what proof/evidence do you have to the contrary?
Because you can't see any stars in the Moon photos. DUH.
Also, Arizona looks like the Moon. Therefore, we landed in Arizona.
<insert crackpot conspiracy theory here>
|
Your services as a citizen, we regret to inform you, are no longer required.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by PJW:
Because you can't see any stars in the Moon photos. DUH.
Also, Arizona looks like the Moon. Therefore, we landed in Arizona.
<insert crackpot conspiracy theory here>
I think they forgot to survey the land before they let the tyco with a camera run around "mars"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
That is certainly an amazing picture. Very similar to a ball of some kind. The human eye trying to make it inot a familar object.
|
"Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never - in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense." Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Retired.
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think that's actually a baseball that Rickey knocked out of the park...err, planet...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've seen that before somewhere, where did it originate? I'm assuming that's satellite imagery from Mars, but I'd like to see its authenticity confirmed, if only seeing its source from a NASA site or something. If it is an actual image, then it'd be interesting to know the scale of that formation.
I hope this doesn't turn into another Face On Mars debacle. Despite its intriguing structure, I doubt it has any more value than its geological origins. And the apparent dimples on its surface may simply be an illusion, much like the so-called Face on Mars was simply a product of the low resolution and lighting conditions of the original image.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Visnaut:
I've seen that before somewhere, where did it originate? I'm assuming that's satellite imagery from Mars, but I'd like to see its authenticity confirmed, if only seeing its source from a NASA site or something.
The image is from an official government site here:
http://ida.wr.usgs.gov/html/m15012/m1501228.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Stogieman:
Looks like a Pinnacle #2.
noonono it's the new top flight 3000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
(
Last edited by ghost_flash; Jan 19, 2004 at 05:16 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Madison, WI
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thank you, perry. Of interest is the first thing they state on that page:
The browse (jpeg) images rendered on this web site are meant solely to facilitate the selection of raw MOC imaging products for download and use by the scientific community. The browse and jpeg images are neither radiometrically nor geometrically accurate and should never be used for quantitative or interpretative purposes.
(
Last edited by Visnaut; Jan 19, 2004 at 12:16 AM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Visnaut:
Thank you, perry. Of interest is the first thing they state on that page:
Well that's just a standard disclaimer. It doesn't invalidate the image
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by perryp:
Well that's just a standard disclaimer. It doesn't invalidate the image
No, it certainly doesn't, it's actually a very sharp image. I simply interpret it as saying not to take the image as being something to base conclusions upon.
Also, according to that page, the resolution of that image is about 4.47m/pixel. I measured the spherical object to be about 40 pixels wide, making it approximately 178.8m (586.6' or just under the length of two football fields). That's pretty big, whatever it is, and makes it all the more interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Visnaut:
No, it certainly doesn't, it's actually a very sharp image. I simply interpret it as saying not to take the image as being something to base conclusions upon.
Also, according to that page, the resolution of that image is about 4.47m/pixel. I measured the spherical object to be about 40 pixels wide, making it approximately 178.8m (586.6' or just under the length of two football fields). That's pretty big, whatever it is, and makes it all the more interesting.
My mistake! I now think it is the new Nike indoor golf course on Mars.
You read it here first folks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: College in the Land of Oz
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Stogieman:
Looks like a Pinnacle #2.
Maybe it's a reflection of where my head is right now, but to me it looks like a Clitoris #1
(
Last edited by RGB; Jan 19, 2004 at 12:50 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by RGB:
Maybe it's a reflection of where my head is right now, but to me it looks like a Clitorus #1
Please spare us the details of where exactly you keep your head.
(and it's "Clitoris")
-s*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: College in the Land of Oz
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Spheric Harlot:
Please spare us the details of where exactly you keep your head.
(and it's "Clitoris")
-s*
Late night. U and I next to eachother on keyboard. You get the picture. Edited.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|