Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Enthusiast Zone > Art & Graphic Design > flickr vs. iweb for photography.

flickr vs. iweb for photography.
Thread Tools
onlykaria
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 28, 2006, 12:52 AM
 
hello,

i am an amateur photographer, i was using .mac with iweb to host my photography site. however, my old computer broke and i am wondering about switching to flickr. you seem to get alot more storage for alot less money but the page does not look as professional. what are people using? what do you guys think?
Computers:
Macbook Pro: 17in, 2.16Ghz, 120GB HD, 1.5 GB ram.
iBook G4: 1.07Ghz, 60GB HD, 756mb ram (on sale for parts)
     
cuidado
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 28, 2006, 04:46 AM
 
flickr is the ****, esp if you want to share and browse.
     
Peter
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 28, 2006, 05:00 AM
 
flickr.
we don't have time to stop for gas
     
onlykaria  (op)
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 28, 2006, 05:17 AM
 
lol, that easy eh?

it is about 1/4 the cost of dot mac and you get like infy times the storage.

ok so here is my second question. is there a tool that will let me upload directly from aperture to flickr?
Computers:
Macbook Pro: 17in, 2.16Ghz, 120GB HD, 1.5 GB ram.
iBook G4: 1.07Ghz, 60GB HD, 756mb ram (on sale for parts)
     
onlykaria  (op)
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 28, 2006, 05:18 AM
 
oh one more question about flickr...

if you have a pro account can is there a way to make your images public but keep people from viewing or downloading the full size images?
Computers:
Macbook Pro: 17in, 2.16Ghz, 120GB HD, 1.5 GB ram.
iBook G4: 1.07Ghz, 60GB HD, 756mb ram (on sale for parts)
     
nbnz
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 28, 2006, 07:56 AM
 
You want to read the FAQ here and the prefs page here
iMac, Intel Core-Duo 2GHz, 2GB, 250GB, OS X 10.4
PowerBook 12", 867MHz, 640MB, 60GB, OS X 10.4
iMac G3, 333MHz, 288MB, 6GB, OS X 10.3
iPods: 3G iPod, 1G mini, 1G shuffle, 2G nano
     
art_director
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN U.S.A.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 28, 2006, 09:52 AM
 
Originally Posted by onlykaria
oh one more question about flickr...

if you have a pro account can is there a way to make your images public but keep people from viewing or downloading the full size images?

Yes, you can restrict that access.

The Flickr Uploader is the best option for uploads -- fast, reliable and badazz batch functionality.
     
nbnz
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 28, 2006, 10:33 AM
 
Originally Posted by art_director
Yes, you can restrict that access.

The Flickr Uploader is the best option for uploads -- fast, reliable and badazz batch functionality.
The FlickrExport plugin for iPhoto is also a great utility (if you use iPhoto). Although it has just become shareware for £12/$21 (was freeware).
iMac, Intel Core-Duo 2GHz, 2GB, 250GB, OS X 10.4
PowerBook 12", 867MHz, 640MB, 60GB, OS X 10.4
iMac G3, 333MHz, 288MB, 6GB, OS X 10.3
iPods: 3G iPod, 1G mini, 1G shuffle, 2G nano
     
th3ph17
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: santa cruz, ca
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 28, 2006, 11:35 AM
 
i'll second the Flickr Uploader. Works great. You can restrict access based on several different variables, both by using Creative Commons licensing controls as well as restricting downloads to friends. Or you can keep certain pics private.

just keep in mind though that if someone can view your image, they have it. What flickr does if you want is place a transparent image OVER your pic, which only makes is harder to save an image easily.

http://flickr.com/photos/th3ph17/
     
onlykaria  (op)
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 28, 2006, 12:21 PM
 
Originally Posted by th3ph17
i'll second the Flickr Uploader. Works great. You can restrict access based on several different variables, both by using Creative Commons licensing controls as well as restricting downloads to friends. Or you can keep certain pics private.

just keep in mind though that if someone can view your image, they have it. What flickr does if you want is place a transparent image OVER your pic, which only makes is harder to save an image easily.

http://flickr.com/photos/th3ph17/
yeah, i looked for the option to place a transparent image over the original, and the help said it had it but i didnt find it.

i am ok with them looking at and having the low res image. its the high resolution images that i am concerned about.
Computers:
Macbook Pro: 17in, 2.16Ghz, 120GB HD, 1.5 GB ram.
iBook G4: 1.07Ghz, 60GB HD, 756mb ram (on sale for parts)
     
onlykaria  (op)
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 28, 2006, 12:44 PM
 
as far as i know flickr uploader does not work directly with aperture.
Computers:
Macbook Pro: 17in, 2.16Ghz, 120GB HD, 1.5 GB ram.
iBook G4: 1.07Ghz, 60GB HD, 756mb ram (on sale for parts)
     
Calimus
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 7, 2006, 01:55 PM
 
Why upload the full rez image if you don't want them to view it? if they can view it, they can take a screenshot. The ONLY way you can keep the full rez image from being copied is to not upload the full rez image for viewing.
     
onlykaria  (op)
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 8, 2006, 12:38 PM
 
Originally Posted by Calimus
Why upload the full rez image if you don't want them to view it? if they can view it, they can take a screenshot. The ONLY way you can keep the full rez image from being copied is to not upload the full rez image for viewing.
thats what i thought too, but its not true.

1-other flickr tools for iphoto resize the image as it is being uploaded.
2- flickr it self resizes the viewable image to 500 pixels on the largest size
3-there is an option to allow users to see "all sizes" by turning that off the most they can view anyway is the 500 pixel image. however i still retain access to all sizes.
4- because on aperture the delete button and the export buttons are so close (bad idea IMO) having a "backup" of individual images is great because i can reimport an image without having to restore the entire library and lose new changes just to get back one image. also have an aperture to flickr export tool would help address the mistakely deleted issue.
5-to see the max image would take more than one screenshot anyway.
Computers:
Macbook Pro: 17in, 2.16Ghz, 120GB HD, 1.5 GB ram.
iBook G4: 1.07Ghz, 60GB HD, 756mb ram (on sale for parts)
     
chrismccorkle
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Georgia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 9, 2006, 01:24 AM
 
flickr.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:47 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,