Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Enthusiast Zone > Classic Macs and Mac OS > Rage 128 or Radeon?

Rage 128 or Radeon?
Thread Tools
dwishbone
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Location: On the moon
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 10, 2002, 04:12 PM
 
I have both a PM 8600 and a PowerBase 200. I want to get a graphics card to go in both of them. I do plan eventually to use X on these machine. Should I get a Rage 128 card or should I get a Radeon based card. Was there a huge performance difference in them to warrant the difference in price? I was looking at either a Radeon 7000 or a Rage 128 Orion.
Anyone know where I can pick one up cheap? I scour ebay and usually the prices are as high or higher than what I can buy commercially.
24" iMac 2.13ghz C2D | 15" MBP 2ghz CD | "Soundwave" 60GB 5G iPod
     
rampant
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: permanent resident of the Land of the Easily Aroused
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 10, 2002, 05:30 PM
 
The radeon is much faster.
     
Jansar
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 11, 2002, 02:06 PM
 
Radeon, BY FAR!!! Even if you put the Rage 128 in a fast machine, it will still run slowly. If you really want to, there is a PCI version of the Mac retail Radeon 8500 (which is nearly twice as fast as the 7500).
World of Warcraft (Whisperwind - Alliance) <The Eternal Spiral>
Go Dogcows!
     
dwishbone  (op)
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Location: On the moon
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 11, 2002, 02:47 PM
 
I have never seen a PCI version of the 8500. I have been only been able to find AGP versions.
I thought the 7000 was the highest PCI card ATI made.
24" iMac 2.13ghz C2D | 15" MBP 2ghz CD | "Soundwave" 60GB 5G iPod
     
Evangellydonut
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Pasadena
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 11, 2002, 04:23 PM
 
according to ATI's website, you thought correctly...the 7000 is the last PCI Radeon. And I though the 7000 is just a re-packaged original Radeon.

As for performance, it has MAJOR advantages over the 128 in 3D, and 'bout the same in 2D...I think you can find Radeons around $100-150...it's worth it at $100.

Now, my question is, what did nVidia do to the Virtual AGP project? where they tried to emulate AGP on PCI or something like that...sounded cool, but haven't heard anything since 'bout 2 years ago <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="frown.gif" />
G4/450, T-bird 1.05GHz, iBook 500, iBook 233...4 different machines, 4 different OSes...(9, 2k, X.1, YDL2.2 respectively) PiA to maintain...
     
MilkmanDan
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: My Powerbook, in Japan!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 16, 2002, 12:57 AM
 
Radeon by far. My buddies next door put a PCI one in their B&W G3 (and took out the Rage) and now they can run Warcraft III. Buy it, or buy a new computer. Depends on what you want to do.
     
seanyepez
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Pleasanton, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 16, 2002, 04:52 AM
 
I don't think the RADEON is going to do enough to the PowerBase to make it a worthwhile upgrade. I think you should stick with the factory video on the clone and upgrade your Power Macintosh 8600 to a PCI RADEON.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:40 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,