|
|
New iMacs
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Standing on the shoulders of giants
Status:
Offline
|
|
Nice that the 21 incher gets 512M graphics. When I can see the price in euros, I might order a replacement for my Feb 2007, 20 incher.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado
Status:
Offline
|
|
Very nice update. Too bad I'm more than 15 days away from when I just purchased my new iMac, but that's okay by me. Even though I know the benchmarks for these will blow everything out of the water.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by imitchellg5
Very nice update. Too bad I'm more than 15 days away from when I just purchased my new iMac,
That's gotta burn a little bit...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Standing on the shoulders of giants
Status:
Offline
|
|
Nearly $2200 for the 21 inch with i5.
FFS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern Ireland
Status:
Offline
|
|
The timing couldn't have been better. Unfortunately, the only store here doesn't have them in yet. And no Magic Trackpad included!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
You can have two storage drives in the new iMacs, one hard and one solid-state. Very nice!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by MacinTommy
That's gotta burn a little bit...
A bit, but since I'm rarely doing anything that will necessitate a difference in speed, I don't care as much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern Ireland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by imitchellg5
A bit, but since I'm rarely doing anything that will necessitate a difference in speed, I don't care as much.
Out of curiosity, which did you buy and how does it perform? I'll be migrating next week from an Oct '08 2.4GHz MacBook.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado
Status:
Offline
|
|
About 3 weeks ago I bought the $1499 iMac, so Core 2 Duo 3.06 GHz, not the new i3. It performs quite well, although the graphics don't seem as smooth as my MacBook Pro's 9600M GT, even when hooked up to my HDTV.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern Ireland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by imitchellg5
About 3 weeks ago I bought the $1499 iMac, so Core 2 Duo 3.06 GHz, not the new i3. It performs quite well, although the graphics don't seem as smooth as my MacBook Pro's 9600M GT, even when hooked up to my HDTV.
Good to know, thanks. I'm assuming that's the ATI Radeon HD 4670?
I actually save a small fortune with Apple's current rebate offers. £1399 purchase price with a free printer goes to £1236 with 14% higher education discount, and as a student I get an iPod Touch for £19. Sell the iPod for printer for £140 takes it down to £1100 or so.
(
Last edited by kylef; Jul 27, 2010 at 04:00 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Little stuff I noticed...
The SD slot now takes SDXC cards (like the new Mac Mini)
The 27" i3 has the option of a 3.6GHz i5 dual core (Which is best - 3.6 i5 dual or 2.8 i5 quad?)
With the SSD option, the system is installed on the SSD, the hard drive is for storage. Nice .
|
It'll be much easier if you just comply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Standing on the shoulders of giants
Status:
Offline
|
|
You can't do the SSD option on the 21 incher. Guess its to do with space constraints. Pity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Edmonton, AB
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mattyb
You can't do the SSD option on the 21 incher. Guess its to do with space constraints. Pity.
Not likely, solid state drives are generally much smaller than desktop drives. I was hoping for quad core in the 21".
Wait I just realized you meant the dual hard drive option.
(
Last edited by macaddict0001; Jul 28, 2010 at 02:21 AM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Standing on the shoulders of giants
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by macaddict0001
Not likely, solid state drives are generally much smaller than desktop drives. I was hoping for quad core in the 21".
Funny, I'm more interested in system and graphics card memory now. I doubt that doing what I do, I'd notice the i3/i5 difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'd say a solid update overall. I'll still be waiting for the next year's update after I graduate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Durham, NC
Status:
Offline
|
|
The SSD option on the big’un goes in a separate bay, which is why you can have both hard disk + ssd. Of course that doesn’t explain why there’s no SSD-only option on the smaller one, though maybe they didn’t feel like dealing with the hassle of making/buying/stocking the brackets to get SSDs into the HDD bay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BFE
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mattyb
Nearly $2200 for the 21 inch with i5.
FFS.
I got my 27" i7 refurb for $1950 with tax. They should drop another $100-200.
|
I'm a bird. I am the 1% (of pets).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern California
Status:
Offline
|
|
The refurb/clearance prices are a joke. On the EDU store I can get an i7 for $150 more then the previous-gen i7, refurbished. Not even worth it when that $200 gets you 130MHz and a far better GPU (and SDXC, not that it's a deal breaker).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Stoneham, MA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Is the SSD "bay" a standard 2.5" HD bay? That would be great. I'd pop a SATA HDD in there and use that for bootcamp, and the 3.5" for mac.
But i'll be the one that spoils this whole thread: I'm not getting the 27" i7 iMac i so strongly desire. Because much to my disbelief, there is still NO matte option. I will not put a glossy screen on this desk, and torture myself every minute I use the computer when the lights are on, or when it's daytime. I really can't believe there's no matte option. And I can't believe the mac pro's still start at $2500. But I guess thats another topic. For a company that wants to make "all" of their customers happy, they really go out of their way to bust balls sometimes. (yes I know that's not news)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BFE
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Brien
The refurb/clearance prices are a joke. On the EDU store I can get an i7 for $150 more then the previous-gen i7, refurbished. Not even worth it when that $200 gets you 130MHz and a far better GPU (and SDXC, not that it's a deal breaker).
Not everyone can get the edu discount.
I just checked at the 27" i7 iMac dropped from $1849 to $1699, a $150 drop.
|
I'm a bird. I am the 1% (of pets).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern Ireland
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's never going to end well whenever you're in the closest Starbucks to the Apple Store with CIH.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: in a weapons producing nation under Jesus
Status:
Offline
|
|
So is it worth the upgrade from the i3 chip to the i5 chip? I"m thinking about either putting that money towards a 2 gig internal, 8 gigs of ram, or the i5 chip. tough choice! I figure I can add the ram at anytime but the HD not so much. I do audio recording mostly using Logic studio but like everyone, I do a little of everything.
I just can't find benchmarks between the i3 and i5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern Ireland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by SeSawaya
So is it worth the upgrade from the i3 chip to the i5 chip? I"m thinking about either putting that money towards a 2 gig internal, 8 gigs of ram, or the i5 chip. tough choice! I figure I can add the ram at anytime but the HD not so much. I do audio recording mostly using Logic studio but like everyone, I do a little of everything.
I just can't find benchmarks between the i3 and i5.
What are you stepping up from? Having moved from a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo to the 3.2GHz Core i3, I'm very impressed. I actually thought there was an error whenever I was unarchiving some RAR files - it was so fast in comparison
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: in a weapons producing nation under Jesus
Status:
Offline
|
|
that's exactly what I have now, the 2.4. I need to play with one!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Argh!
I would so like to have a 21" model with a ssd. What's it like to swap a drive in one of these, more work then on the white c2d models?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Stoneham, MA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
You have to remove the glass, then the whole LCD. That said, it's actually not as bad as it sounds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: in a weapons producing nation under Jesus
Status:
Offline
|
|
Found this on the i3 Vs i5. Might help
In comparison to the Core i5 750 and the Core i7 processors, the Core i3 is quite different. It has an integrated graphics processor on the CPU die, it has some extra SSE instruction for better encryption support, and it does not support turbo boost. It also is built to operate with a different set of chipsets, although the Core i3 processor will work in most P55 motherboards as well.
These clear waters are mudded, however, by the Intel Core i5 600 series products which were released alongside the Core i3. These lower-end Core i5 processors also have an on-die integrated graphics processor, they also have the extra SSE instructions, and they also are built primarily for the new chipsets. The only difference between these and the Core i3, therefor, is that the Core i5 600 processors have turbo boost and the Core i3 processors don't.
Strange, isn't it? One would think that the Core i3, i5, and i7 brands were created to mark differences in ability. It seems, however, that there are larger differences between processors in the same brand than between those in different brands.
In any case, what this really means is that the Core i3 processor is the one to buy if you're on a budget. It only loses turbo boost, which in the low-end Core i5 processors is not an impressive feature. The Core i5 processors are faster, however, so if you're not constrained by budget they are also a good choice. If you're interested in learning more about the Core i5, please read our article on how the Core i5 stacks up against the Core i7.
Read more: Core i3 Explained
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|