Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Notebooks > Hard Drive Speeds Alum 12" Powerbook G4 7200rpm vs 5400rpm

Hard Drive Speeds Alum 12" Powerbook G4 7200rpm vs 5400rpm
Thread Tools
Cottonsworth
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 23, 2010, 04:04 PM
 
I'm looking to upgrade the hard drive on a 12" alum Powerbook G4 I have.

I'm looking at a 100gb Seagate ST910021A 7200rpm drive vs a Western Digital Scorpio 250gb 5400rpm drive.

Both have a 8mb buffer but the 5400rpm WD has faster read seek times and average latency compared to the Seagate (12 vs 10.5) and (5.5 vs 4.2). Am I missing something here? The 5400rpm drive is faster than a 7200rpm drive? Please fill me in. Thanks.
     
analogue SPRINKLES
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 23, 2010, 04:09 PM
 
7200 is faster. go with that.
     
Cottonsworth  (op)
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 23, 2010, 04:22 PM
 
Originally Posted by analogue SPRINKLES View Post
7200 is faster. go with that.
That is what I thought but can you explain to me why the 5400rpm one would have better specs than the 7200rpm one? I found looking at the specs for both very confusing. Thanks.
     
Cottonsworth  (op)
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 23, 2010, 05:12 PM
 
Someone else told me that the 250gb 5400rpm would be faster because it is 2.5 times denser. Does that make any sense? Thanks.
     
reader50
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 23, 2010, 05:18 PM
 
It might be, if the capacity jump is all due to higher platter density. On the other hand, if the 100 GB is a 1-platter and the 250 GB is a 2-platter, the density may not be much higher. You'd have to check the specs more closely to find out the real density-per-platter figure.

Or you could see if both drives are in a performance database. If they are, you could compare real speed figures.
     
Cottonsworth  (op)
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 23, 2010, 05:40 PM
 
Do you think manufacturer specs are to be trusted? If so, the WD 5400rpm is clearly faster than the Seagate 7200rpm. Thanks.
     
amazing
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 23, 2010, 05:56 PM
 
100 GB just doesn't seem big enough, does it?

are you buying the HD or are these just something you've got hanging around?
     
chabig
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 23, 2010, 06:41 PM
 
I can't believe it will make a bit of difference in an old Powerbook G4. Any modern hard drive will saturate the data bus to the CPU, no matter how fast it's spinning. The only advantage the 7200 RPM drive is in lower latency.
     
amazing
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 23, 2010, 07:17 PM
 
it will make a difference--but even 5400 rpm will make a significant difference, given that the original HD was 4200 rpm
     
Cottonsworth  (op)
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 23, 2010, 08:25 PM
 
I have both laying around. I got the 100gb 7200rpm off a friend who parted out his high-res 1.67ghz G4, it came stock with it as a build to order option from Apple.

So I guess the consensus is I go with the 250gb 5400rpm one? Thanks.
( Last edited by Cottonsworth; Apr 23, 2010 at 08:26 PM. Reason: Clarification)
     
Simon
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 24, 2010, 02:08 AM
 
Originally Posted by chabig View Post
Any modern hard drive will saturate the data bus to the CPU, no matter how fast it's spinning.
You sure about that? IIRC that PB had a 133 MHz bus. So for DMA we're looking at 133 MHz * 32 bits = 4.3 Gbps, right? Its PATA bus to the drive OTOH is 100MB/s.

I'd say the real bottleneck is the PATA bus, not the data bus to the CPU.
     
chabig
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 24, 2010, 03:42 AM
 
Here's the info on the ATA-6 bus in the machine (Parallel ATA - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia). The maximum data transfer rate is 100Gbps. By the way, I think the ATA bus is only 16 bits wide.

I dug further and here is a website that did some benchmarking where they discovered the 5400 RPM drives were about 5% slower than the 7200 RPM drives (Seagate Momentus 5400.3 160GB Mobile HDD)
     
Simon
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 24, 2010, 04:56 AM
 
ATA-6 = UltraATA/100 = 100MBps = 800 Mbps, not 100 Gbps.
     
chabig
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 24, 2010, 10:17 AM
 
You're right. That's what happens late at night!
     
reader50
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 24, 2010, 03:48 PM
 
With PATA, you lose about 1/4 of the rated speed to bus overhead. On PATA 100, data transfer will top out around 75 MB per second. That's still pretty good, and certainly much faster than your old drive could manage.

If you got a solid-state drive, it could saturate the bus at all times. A later hard drive is likely to saturate at the beginning of the drive, but will fall off a bit as it fills up.
     
Simon
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 24, 2010, 04:45 PM
 
Good luck finding a 2.5" PATA SSD at a decent price.
     
reader50
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 24, 2010, 05:14 PM
 
Good luck finding *any* SSD at a decent price. They're running 20-30x the price per GB of hard drives.

Which is a real shame. Those who have SSDs don't want to go back.
     
Simon
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 25, 2010, 01:38 AM
 
Hmm. My point was that PATA SSDs are massively more expensive than SATA SSDs per GB. And compared to SATA SSDs there's almost no selection once you've settled on which capacity you're looking for.
     
amazing
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 25, 2010, 09:04 AM
 
I'm not sure it serves much purpose to hotrod an old Honda Civic (12" PB?), main thing is to just get it back on the road, 'cause it can be quite useful--for example, as a jukebox or just some mobile browsing on the couch.

Be kind of interesting to see speed tests between an iPad and a 12" PB, from that point of view. Yes, they're different beasties, different weights, all that, but if you've already got one, and it's just for the couch?
     
Cottonsworth  (op)
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 25, 2010, 11:19 PM
 
I'm using the 12" PB to be my Mac "netbook." Something to use when traveling when I don't need the horsepower of my MBP. Mainly just surfing the net and maybe working on some office apps. I figured a hard drive upgrade may give it a noticeable performance boost. I'll report what I find after I do the upgrade, which should be fairly soon.
     
amazing
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 26, 2010, 12:10 AM
 
Well, having gone from the 4200 rpm original HD to a 5400 rpm WD3200BEVE in a 1.33 12" PB, I can tell you there's a noticeable boost. I can also tell you, from personal experience, that it got hotter and that the fans would come on in "airplane mode."

And I know that many people will say that the newer PATA HDs don't get any hotter than the originals. All I'm saying is that I used that 12" PB for 2 summers before replacing the HD, and that it did indeed get hotter, to the point that I bought a laptop cooler. YMMV.
     
Dex13
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bay Area of San Jose
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 26, 2010, 01:33 AM
 
you'll regret swapping out the hard drive after you take the laptop apart. (and maybe putting it back together.)

it isn't fun at all.
     
amazing
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 26, 2010, 09:41 AM
 
Yep, it's a very complicated swap. Which is why you should print out 2 copies of the ifixit.com guide and tape the tiny screws directly to the appropriate spots of the second copy. Makes it much easier. Just be sure to use something like a dental pick to pry up the connectors: whatever you do, don't pull on the wires to loosen the connectors.
     
Cottonsworth  (op)
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 26, 2010, 10:51 AM
 
Why would it be hotter? The fact that it spins faster or the capacity? Would I be better off using the "slower" Seagate 100gb 7200rpm that came out of a PB 1.67ghz? Thanks.

Originally Posted by amazing View Post
Well, having gone from the 4200 rpm original HD to a 5400 rpm WD3200BEVE in a 1.33 12" PB, I can tell you there's a noticeable boost. I can also tell you, from personal experience, that it got hotter and that the fans would come on in "airplane mode."

And I know that many people will say that the newer PATA HDs don't get any hotter than the originals. All I'm saying is that I used that 12" PB for 2 summers before replacing the HD, and that it did indeed get hotter, to the point that I bought a laptop cooler. YMMV.
     
amazing
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 26, 2010, 01:00 PM
 
The original HD was a 4200 rpm, probably lower power consumption hence cooler. The WD 320 GB 5400 rpm wasn't all that much hotter, just enough to be noticeable, just enough to occasionally ramp up the fans when the PB was under load.

Having the large HD was definitely worth the very occasional irritation of fan noise. Frankly, installing the HD is enough of a hassle that you should put the largest HD in, simply because you don't want to do too often.

Another important point is to max out the RAM.
     
Sosa
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Miami
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 25, 2010, 03:48 AM
 
I swapped out my original 4200 rpm 40 gig hard drive and self-installed a 60 gig 7200 rpm. I used the iFixit guide and thought it was an interesting 2 hour project- done out of necesity mind you, my computer was dropped once too many times! But hey, it has been dropped a few more times and here I am still writing on it. How much of a beating can these 12" Powerbooks take? It is by far the biggest bang for my buck of any equipment I have ever purchased.
2011 iMac 2.7 i5, 16gb RAM, 1TB HD
Previous Macs: Apple IIc+, iMac 350 G3, iBook 700 G3, G4 Powerbooks 12" 1ghz & 15" 1.67ghz
Join Team MacNN.
     
afransen
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 17, 2010, 02:22 AM
 
ok, so i have the same question. I have a 17" 1.67 G4 Powerbook, thinking i had better swap out the hard drive before it fails and to increase the HD size. Anyway, so I have been browsing Western Digital and other brands of HDs and they all are 5400rpms. On ebay i can find the 7200rpm hard drives. Currently i have a 100gb 5400rpm, is the 7200 worth getting. Also is there a 7200 PATA out there larger than 160GB?

Thanks for the help
     
Sosa
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Miami
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 17, 2010, 08:46 AM
 
Check out this sale:
Search Results for garage.sale at MacSales.com

I'm back down to a 5400 rpm drive myself after trading my 12" PB for a 17" PB 1.67. If I had to replace the hard drive I would go for one of those.
2011 iMac 2.7 i5, 16gb RAM, 1TB HD
Previous Macs: Apple IIc+, iMac 350 G3, iBook 700 G3, G4 Powerbooks 12" 1ghz & 15" 1.67ghz
Join Team MacNN.
     
hadocon
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Internet
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 18, 2010, 01:07 AM
 
Have you considered power use?

I imagine that the difference in drive performance in real life situations will be negligible. With this in mind it might be prudent to give power requirements (battery life) a thought or two.
20+ year MacNN forum member. MacBook Air 11" 1.6Ghz 4GB 128GB Backlit Keyboard, 4S, iPad Mini
     
THOMBOMBADIL
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 25, 2010, 06:04 PM
 
Is there ant technical reason an ssd would not work in a 12" G4 PB?

(ignoring cost/benefit, size....)
     
chabig
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 25, 2010, 06:20 PM
 
Yes. The interfaces are not compatible. PB G4s used PATA drives. Modern computers use SATA. SSDs are made for modern computers.
     
Cold Warrior
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Polwaristan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 25, 2010, 06:56 PM
 
I found at least one pata ssd on newegg in a quick search just now. Not saying it's worth it, but THOM if you really wanted one...
     
THOMBOMBADIL
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 25, 2010, 07:29 PM
 
Yes, they are beginning to appear as other market niches saturate. The price of SSDs seems to be coming down. I do not need a big drive, I am using about 22GB so a 64GB ssd would be big enough, and might run cooler than the 7200 rpm 100GB Hitachi I am using. Is there any reason that this might not work?
     
THOMBOMBADIL
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 26, 2010, 02:37 PM
 
I think the answer, for me, is that the time to do this will be when an ATA/IDE SSD for G4 PB is offered by OWC or iFixit or similar. I am ok spending $150 or so, but I lack the skills/knowledge to deal with the inevitable minor soft/hardware bugs that will arise.
     
OreoCookie
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 26, 2010, 02:46 PM
 
ATA is dead, the industry has moved to SATA quite a few years ago. And changing a harddrive in a 12" PowerBook is a Royal Pain with capital letters. If I were you'd I'd save the money towards a new machine.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
amazing
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 26, 2010, 08:04 PM
 
You already own the 12" PB. Having changed the HD in a 12" several times, it's definitely doable if you're a person who can handle complicated fiddly direction and loads of small screws.

Print out 2 copies of the directions at ifixit.com and use one of the copies as a blueprint where you can tape each and every screw in the exact location that it came out of. That's very simple and very effective. You reassemble in reverse order, methodically checking that you didn't overlook a screw taped to the blueprint.

And you can get a WD3200BEVE for about $90 (newegg.com)
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:59 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,