Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Terminator Salvation

Terminator Salvation
Thread Tools
mattyb
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Standing on the shoulders of giants
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 12, 2008, 10:10 AM
 
Well the trailor is out. http://www.apple.com/trailers/wb/ter...ion/large.html

Can't say that I like Christian Bale using his Batman voice. T2, IMHO, ranks as one of the best, if not THE best sequel of all time. I hope they don't f**k up this as much as T3.
( Last edited by mattyb; Dec 12, 2008 at 10:36 AM. )
     
Maflynn
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 12, 2008, 10:54 AM
 
Looks good.

It doesn't bother me that Bale is using his "batman" voice. I liked the original terminator movie, and all of the other sequels paled in comparison, even T2
~Mike
     
Ted L. Nancy
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 12, 2008, 04:54 PM
 
Originally Posted by mattyb View Post
Well the trailor is out. http://www.apple.com/trailers/wb/ter...ion/large.html

Can't say that I like Christian Bale using his Batman voice. T2, IMHO, ranks as one of the best, if not THE best sequel of all time. I hope they don't f**k up this as much as T3.
I like T3. I'm glad we have a T4 coming and that the franchise still has so much potential.
10.7.1 on Mac Pro 8x2.8
     
Big Mac
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 12, 2008, 05:12 PM
 
It does look good. I liked T3 for what it was, but it was a much lighter weight film than T2 obviously. T2 was the best by far (I agree it's one of the best sequels ever), and it has stood the test of time graphically, which is more than can be said for T1 (which is still a decent film but looks quite dated especially with the Terminator scenes toward the end). Hopefully T4 can kick some ass.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Chuckit
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 12, 2008, 06:25 PM
 
I still haven't watched the third one. T2 was so perfect that I don't want to spoil it. I might possibly watch this one. Christian Bale tends to do good stuff, but then again there was Reign of Fire.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
ort888
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your Anus
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 12, 2008, 07:04 PM
 
Originally Posted by Maflynn View Post
Looks good.

It doesn't bother me that Bale is using his "batman" voice. I liked the original terminator movie, and all of the other sequels paled in comparison, even T2
Thank you.

The original movie is a complete classic. The second movie, is a pretty fun popcorn movie/special effects extravaganza that is a very poor sequel to the first movie and ultimately not a great movie.

Many people seem to disagree though...

The third movie is just horrible.

The TV show is horrible.

The fourth movie will probably also be horrible.
( Last edited by ort888; Dec 12, 2008 at 07:15 PM. )

My sig is 1 pixel too big.
     
Big Mac
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 12, 2008, 07:23 PM
 
Originally Posted by ort888 View Post
The original movie is a complete classic. The second movie, is a pretty fun popcorn movie/special effects extravaganza that is a very poor sequel to the first movie and ultimately not a great movie.
Wow, you really think that? T2 was excellent.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Chuckit
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 12, 2008, 07:33 PM
 
I can understand why somebody might like Terminator but not T2. It was a sequel in the sense that it came after the plot of the first one, but it wasn't trying to be the original. I thought the second had much more interesting characters, particularly Sarah Connor. It was much smarter and more artful than your usual action movie, but I think it appeals to different tastes than the first one did.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Uncle Skeleton
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Rockville, MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 12, 2008, 07:49 PM
 
T1 was the only one that wasn't trying to be "grand." That was definitely a plus. Ever since then the characters take themselves way too seriously. Except Arnold from T2 of course, that was cool. "You were going to kill them?" "I am a terminator."

Edit: I just want to say that I do like "grand" movies, especially if there is an apocalypse in there, but it does get tiring. What I really want is a light-hearted apocalypse, kind of like the Family Guy did.
     
Chuckit
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 12, 2008, 08:02 PM
 
I know what you mean, but I don't hold it against T2 that lots of other movies have tried to do the same thing. That's like hating The Godfather because there are lots of generic crime flicks out there. I prefer to direct my tiredness at all the movies that didn't do it as well.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
ghporter
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 12, 2008, 11:12 PM
 
T1 was made on a relative shoestring, and the filmmakers had to be very creative to get their movie made at all, let alone made well. Much of the film was made using very old-style effects that were just done very well. For example, near the end of the movie, when the terminator endoskeleton is stalking Sarah through the factory, it was simply a puppet with the works out of frame; a very low-tech way to do the effect.

T2 was an overall very good story. Sarah has gone out and learned how to survive in what she knows is coming, and the rest of the world thinks she's bats. Until the T800 shows up, of course. The advancement in terminator design resulting in the T1000 was a neat idea and one that made the T1000 much more scary. It was also a well-made film that featured plenty of spectacle. I can't say I like either T1 or T2 better than the other because they're so different, but I liked them both very, very much.

I've never seen T3 and I'm not looking at trying.

I have yet to watch a whole episode of "The Sarah Connor Chronicles," but what I have seen is both well made and interesting. They have a good cast, what appears to be solid writing, and the money to do everything right. From all reports, they are doing just that.

From what I've seen of the TWO "Terminator: Salvation" trailers, I am looking forward to this film. Much of what was hinted at in T1 and T2 (flashbacks mostly) may now actually be there on film...

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
nonhuman
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 12, 2008, 11:20 PM
 
I actually just watched T1 for the first time the othe weekend. It really was a fantastic movie. It was really refreshing to see a move that relied so heavily on effects and yet didn't use them as a crutch to carry the plot (plus I'm a sucker for old-school effects). I'm planning on watching T2 again this weekend (haven't seen it since it first came out on VHS), and then moving on to 3 which I haven't seen yet. Really looking forward to 4. (Also I've been watching SCC, which I love. But Summer Glau may have a disproportionately large effect on that...)
     
starman
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 13, 2008, 03:25 AM
 
Yeah, they made good movies back then, before Armageddon ruined it for everyone.

I wouldn't put T2 in the "popcorn movie" category. That's generally for crap you need to turn your brain off for. T2 was far from that. A damn good film.

Home - Twitter - Sig Wall-Retired - Flickr
     
brassplayersrock²
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 13, 2008, 03:31 AM
 
No Summer Glau in this movie?
     
nonhuman
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 13, 2008, 03:35 AM
 
No

But at least Moon Bloodgood will be:

(I highly recommend a Google image search.)
     
brassplayersrock²
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 13, 2008, 03:39 AM
 


p.s.
I read her last name as: bloodwood
( Last edited by brassplayersrock²; Dec 13, 2008 at 12:46 PM. )
     
Brien
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 13, 2008, 04:59 AM
 
Looks better than T3.

This whole theme of the future changing from all the time travel seems pretty interesting.
     
brassplayersrock²
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 13, 2008, 12:45 PM
 
     
Chuckit
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 13, 2008, 05:25 PM
 
Originally Posted by Brien View Post
Looks better than T3.

This whole theme of the future changing from all the time travel seems pretty interesting.
They actually introduced that idea on the TV series too. Two people have come back from the future at different times, but they remember different things about it, so one of them is convinced the other is repressing his memories. Then finally he says, "Wait a minute, I'm not repressing my memories. Those things never happened to me. We're from different futures."
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Langdon
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 13, 2008, 06:41 PM
 
Why was there a Transformer in the final scene in that trailer?
     
nonhuman
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 13, 2008, 10:03 PM
 
Most of the way through T3 now. Wow, this movie sucks. It's like a cartoony version of the first two.
     
nonhuman
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 13, 2008, 10:32 PM
 
Movie's over. Wow. Ended with a bang.
     
CharlesS
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 13, 2008, 11:10 PM
 
Originally Posted by Langdon View Post
Why was there a Transformer in the final scene in that trailer?
Wow, I can't believe someone would get this:



confused with this:



They don't even look the same!
( Last edited by CharlesS; Mar 9, 2009 at 03:06 PM. )

Ticking sound coming from a .pkg package? Don't let the .bom go off! Inspect it first with Pacifist. Macworld - five mice!
     
sdilley14
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La Crosse, WI
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2008, 11:21 AM
 
Looks kinda cool...
2.3 GHz Intel i5 MacBook Pro
iPhone 4 - 16 GB - Black
8gb iPod Nano
     
MallyMal
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2008, 03:03 PM
 
I think he meant Transformer as in Optimus Prime referring to that big robot.
     
CharlesS
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2008, 03:54 PM
 
I guess I wouldn't know, because I've never been too into the terminator and transformer movies - I'm holding out for Capacitor 3. The first two of the trilogy really seemed to be building up energy, and I hear that this is going to be the one that finally lets it all loose.

Ticking sound coming from a .pkg package? Don't let the .bom go off! Inspect it first with Pacifist. Macworld - five mice!
     
brassplayersrock²
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2008, 03:59 PM
 
^ do NOT do a g.i.s on non filtered mode for capacitor 3!
     
elrah
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: A Wonderful Place
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2008, 04:39 PM
 
T1 is a classic, T2 is a good popcorn movie... T3 is like a less good T2. I haven't bothered with the TV series because it doesn't get past my intuition for crappy tv series. I'm intrigued to see how Salvation turns out. Like a movie length version of Kyle's flashbacks from T1. I always wanted to see more of that future. Hope I won't regret watching it like I do the Star Wars PT, maybe some things were best left to my imagination.
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2008, 05:26 PM
 
I like the TV series. It's popcorn stuff only of course, but so are T2 and T3.

But yeah, that trailer looks like a cross between T2, Batman, and Transformers.
     
brassplayersrock²
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 15, 2008, 02:26 AM
 
damn this thread!

went out an bought T1($5) and T3 ($3) (had T2) and just finished the trilogy. *sigh* great, greater, meh

off to bed for me
     
Langdon
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 15, 2008, 02:46 AM
 
I am all for growing out the film franchise with new character/enemy elements but a giant robot is cliche. The film should have stayed true to the basic spirit of the original Terminator and kept the robots threatening but manageable. They had their drop ships and other miscellaneous motorized Skynet drones but to see a 5 story terminator clumsily stomping around ruins the premise for me.

And the Post Judgment Day world in this film looks like they poached the sets from the Resident Evil movie people.
     
ghporter
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 15, 2008, 11:01 AM
 
Originally Posted by brassplayersrock² View Post
^ do NOT do a g.i.s on non filtered mode for capacitor 3!
??!!!????!

After 10 pages of images to see what the heck you're warning about, I gave up...

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
brassplayersrock²
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 15, 2008, 11:14 AM
 
01101101 01100001 01100100 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01101100 01101111 01101111 01101011
     
- - e r i k - -
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 15, 2008, 11:49 PM
 
Originally Posted by Uncle Skeleton View Post
What I really want is a light-hearted apocalypse,
So you want an apocalypso then?

[ fb ] [ flickr ] [â™Ĵ] [scl] [ last ] [ plaxo ]
     
Brien
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 16, 2008, 02:46 AM
 
Originally Posted by brassplayersrock² View Post
01101101 01100001 01100100 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01101100 01101111 01101111 01101011
01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01110011 01110101 01100011 01101011

     
Chongo
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 16, 2008, 12:07 PM
 
Originally Posted by nonhuman View Post
No

But at least Moon Bloodgood will be:

(I highly recommend a Google image search.)
Fixenated, and Hot Babes thread worthy
45/47
     
ghporter
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 16, 2008, 08:54 PM
 
Originally Posted by brassplayersrock² View Post
01101101 01100001 01100100 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01101100 01101111 01101111 01101011
01011001 01100101 01110011 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01100100 01101001 01100100 00101110 00100000 00100000 01000011 01101100 01100101 01110110 01100101 01110010 00101110

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Stogieman
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 16, 2008, 09:28 PM
 
You know Apple should really add binary to dashboard translator widget.

Slick shoes?! Are you crazy?!
     
Mac User #001
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: WI, United States
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2008, 12:28 AM
 
Originally Posted by nonhuman View Post
No

But at least Moon Bloodgood will be:

(I highly recommend a Google image search.)
Looks faintly like Jessica Biel here, no?
I have returned... 2020 MacBook Air - 1.1 GHz Quad-Core i5 - 16 GB RAM
     
Don Pickett
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: New York, NY, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2008, 12:38 AM
 
Looks craptastic. Also unfortunately looks like they're continuing the trajectory since T2, which is to substitute scary robots and explosions for writing.

The beauty of the original Terminator is that it wasn't sci-fi: it was a horror movie, which meant the focus was on atmosphere and suggestion. This is also true of Alien, which is why it's so good. The following movies have been big budget Hollywood explosionfests, which means the focus is on, well, explosions. This one looks the same. (And, for the record, I think T2 was was an abominably crappy movie, right down to Arnie's last scene where he's lowered into molten metal giving the thumbs up or whatever. Talk aboutcher crap.)
The era of anthropomorphizing hardware is over.
     
starman
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2008, 12:54 AM
 
Terminator wasn't a horror movie. WTF?

Home - Twitter - Sig Wall-Retired - Flickr
     
nonhuman
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2008, 12:55 AM
 
Originally Posted by Mac User #001 View Post
Looks faintly like Jessica Biel here, no?
She kinda does. Never noticed that before.
     
Chuckit
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2008, 06:21 AM
 
Originally Posted by Mac User #001 View Post
Looks faintly like Jessica Biel here, no?
She really doesn't look a thing like her normally, but I still think she'd pretty cute.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
elrah
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: A Wonderful Place
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2008, 06:26 AM
 
Originally Posted by Don Pickett View Post
Looks craptastic. Also unfortunately looks like they're continuing the trajectory since T2, which is to substitute scary robots and explosions for writing.

The beauty of the original Terminator is that it wasn't sci-fi: it was a horror movie, which meant the focus was on atmosphere and suggestion. This is also true of Alien, which is why it's so good. The following movies have been big budget Hollywood explosionfests, which means the focus is on, well, explosions. This one looks the same. (And, for the record, I think T2 was was an abominably crappy movie, right down to Arnie's last scene where he's lowered into molten metal giving the thumbs up or whatever. Talk aboutcher crap.)
Exactly right. Alien and Terminator seem to have suffered very similar fates. Both of the original films had strong cinematographic value, very well directed, stylish, etc. The sequels have successively reduced any element of subtlty from the films in favour of dumb effects. So its no surprise that the majority of people prefer AlienS and T2.

Originally Posted by starman View Post
Terminator wasn't a horror movie. WTF?
I think the film could be classified as a sci-fi/horror. There is more suspense than a standard action film, though the suspense has been diluted in the sequels as Don Picket says. And more frightening/menacing than a thriller, though I think this is a closer call.
     
brassplayersrock²
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2008, 06:27 AM
 
hopefully she'll go through a time bubble (whatever they're called) *wink* *wink* *nudge* *nudge* a ha
     
starman
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2008, 09:24 AM
 
Sorry, but Aliens didn't suffer from explosions. In fact, I think there were only a handful of them in the whole film. T2 had good, new effects for its time but the writing was very good too. By your own logic, Alien 3 and T3 should have done just as well but they didn't because they lacked the effort put into the previous films.

Also, Alien came out at a time when movies were made differently. You couldn't make that kind of movie today, or Blade Runner for that matter. Also, Aliens and T2 both came out 7 years after their predecessors (1979-1986 and 1984-1991 respectively). Things change in seven years.

Home - Twitter - Sig Wall-Retired - Flickr
     
Mac User #001
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: WI, United States
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2008, 09:53 AM
 
Originally Posted by brassplayersrock² View Post
hopefully she'll go through a time bubble (whatever they're called) *wink* *wink* *nudge* *nudge* a ha
Judging from the Google Image Search I was told to perform, that shouldn't be a problem
I have returned... 2020 MacBook Air - 1.1 GHz Quad-Core i5 - 16 GB RAM
     
elrah
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: A Wonderful Place
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 18, 2008, 12:05 PM
 
Originally Posted by starman View Post
Sorry, but Aliens didn't suffer from explosions. In fact, I think there were only a handful of them in the whole film. T2 had good, new effects for its time but the writing was very good too. By your own logic, Alien 3 and T3 should have done just as well but they didn't because they lacked the effort put into the previous films.
Aliens suffers from "dumb american syndrome". "Hey man lets kill 'em man, Yeah!" *machine gun noise* "Hooooo RAH!"

I like Aliens, but it planted the seed for the franchises demise.

Originally Posted by starman View Post
Also, Alien came out at a time when movies were made differently. You couldn't make that kind of movie today, or Blade Runner for that matter. Also, Aliens and T2 both came out 7 years after their predecessors (1979-1986 and 1984-1991 respectively). Things change in seven years.
Yeah, its a shame that film studios have lowered their expectations on audience intelligence.
     
powerbook867
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The midwest...
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 18, 2008, 12:10 PM
 
Sorta looking forward to Salvation, but I am hesitant to say "Hooooo RAH!" just yet..

I am a huge Alien/Aliens/Alien3 junky... 2 changed the genre of the series significantly (which I still enjoyed), but the directors cut of Alien3 somewhat brought it back to the original concept. Resurrection was simply terrible. I died a little inside when I watched it.. uggh.
Joe
     
starman
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 18, 2008, 12:55 PM
 
Originally Posted by elrah View Post
Aliens suffers from "dumb american syndrome". "Hey man lets kill 'em man, Yeah!" *machine gun noise* "Hooooo RAH!"

I like Aliens, but it planted the seed for the franchises demise.
BUZZ! Sorry. I have to disagree here. What did you want? Another slow-paced film? Aliens was a great action flick because it gave audiences the chance to see how badass those things were by putting them up against a group of marines. It was awesome. Saw it on midnight opening night.

Home - Twitter - Sig Wall-Retired - Flickr
     
 
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,