|
|
feedback on brochure
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Durango CO
Status:
Offline
|
|
(
Last edited by mania; Jan 13, 2007 at 10:32 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Michigan, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I like it! I didn't know what to expect but it has almost a retro bold feeling to it, like something you would grab from one of those racks in the lobby of a hotel or library back in 1984. It's colorful, information is grouped well, it has logical 'headers' that inform of the detail blocks below them, and it has big pictures. And lots of yellow, which I like.
I totally approve. Not like that matters, but it totally works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In the South
Status:
Offline
|
|
Some rules were broken , but whatever works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN U.S.A.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Durango CO
Status:
Offline
|
|
No offense taken - I asked for feedback...
how does one convey essential information without making it too busy? any examples?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN U.S.A.
Status:
Offline
|
|
You obviously need to get ten pounds into a five-pound bag. There are an infinite number of ways of doing this.
Treading lightly...
I would work on the heirarchy of information. I would consolidate where possible and use a family of typefaces to communicate the primary copy -- currently you're using one bold face for most of the info. For example, you could use a bold face from a family for the subheads and book / roman / light / etc. foe the supporting copy. This would help to create buckets of info that can be scanned quickly and easily. You've attempted this but, IMHO, could take it further.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN U.S.A.
Status:
Offline
|
|
BTW, Bitcastle is an effing cool name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: The bottom of Cloud City
Status:
Offline
|
|
Everything looks a bit flat and the colours to typical. Try adding more detail and some gradients.
|
"Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'd tend to agree with art director. I like white space. I also don't like blue and yellow, but that's just me.
However, I'd have more issues with the copy...get a good copy writer and your job will be much easier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status:
Offline
|
|
the yellow is a bit eye-painful, but if it's meant to stand out in a rack of brochures (think rest area/tourist info stop) then I guess there's justification for that. The outside does better with being consistent/not busy, the only major thing I'd change is maybe bumping up the Durango, CO a point or two and not using Brush Script. I like how you've nested it in the sky area, it shouldn't bump the mountains. The rafter's names in the left column impinge on the body copy area, I know it would be hard to cram them beneath the circles without making the pix into thumbprints, but maybe some other (vertical!?!) treatment would work better and not seem so cramped.
On the inside you've introduced some new fonts that don't seem to go with anything (like AD said, pick a family or two of fonts and stick with them) and things don't line up as well, creating an unclear column. For the difference in alignment, you may as well enlarge the photos to match the text margin, or vice versa.
The circle with the raft on this side pulls attention away from a really nice photo and pullquote (the train) so if you can't find a better place for it maybe you don't need it. Also your design credit should go someplace more inobtrusive. (center panel outside below address?)
looks good though!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's a brochure, does the job, rules were broken, oh well.
INHO Graphic Design is about the solving of problems, be them visual or not, you are the mediator between the problem/brief and the solution/outcome, the client has a budget, a starting point, some (normally) tired ideas of an outcome and that's about it.
The reason I'm babbling all this out is because I think the real issue with the brochure is the amount of content? Or perhaps it's that a brochure isn't really the best outcome? Or perhaps it's that the budget is too small condiering the aims, etc?
For truly the best outcomes, you have to get to the heart of the problem and then head off on an inspired journey. Unfortunately the industry often relies on subjective opinion, tight deadlines and grey brains holding the purse strings.
Anyways rant over, it's alright.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: United Kingdom, North London
Status:
Offline
|
|
well i do agree that it is a little bit busy and on the first picture the white box where the text was placed in wasn't straight or a lined with yellow banner arcoss the top.
But i think that if this brochure were folded up, so it has 3 panel then i think it might be ok.
Still very nice, i think you did a good job ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In the South
Status:
Offline
|
|
A good designer will convince the client of the goals, outcome, help them widdle it down. If there is a reason and evidence, they client will trust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|