Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Notebooks > MacBook CPU temp vs. 1GHz G4 AlBook and 20" iMac

MacBook CPU temp vs. 1GHz G4 AlBook and 20" iMac
Thread Tools
bryanmsi
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2006, 01:56 PM
 
There are so many posts about the heat issues with the MacBook I thought I would post some comparisons of other Mac hardware for comparison. I only repeated the test twice and averaged the measures. I'm sure your mileage will vary.

So I've tested my 1GHZ Aluminum Powerbook and my 20" 2.0GHZ dual core iMac along with my MacBook.

76 F Ambient

G4 PowerBook idle : 106 F
G4 PowerBook full load: 141 F

20" Dual core iMac idle: 101 F
20" Dual core iMac full load: 133 F

13" Black MacBook idle: 124-126 F
13" Black MacBook full load: 179 F

Clearly, Apple's notebooks run hotter than its desktops, although one could argue the iMac is just a really big notebook case. Higher heat in portables makes sense given the challenge of removing heat from a confined space. However, at idle, the Macbook is only 20 degrees F hotter than a G4 or the iMac. It does get warmer under load than either of those machines, however, at about 40 degrees hotter than either one. Actually, almost 50 degrees hotter than the iMac.

Since the iMac is using the same CPU as the MacBook, this temperature difference should be entirely dependent on the ability of each to remove heat from the enclosure. The iMac is much better at doing this than the MacBook (I won't speculate as to why/how).

The iMac keeps itself cool with no problems and was the fastest to drop CPU temps when the load was removed from the CPU, shedding virtually all of its surplus heat in 30 seconds and returning to baseline. The PowerBook felt uncomfortably hot underneath near the back and also the screen hinge was REALLY hot during this test. I also heard the PowerBook fan come on, but the air volume from this fan is significantly lower than the MacBooks fan (which also came on).

I found the MacBook and older PowerBook to feel equally warm against skin, most likely due to the aluminum's physical conduction being so high and the MacBook's polycarbonate conduction being lower. Part of the reason the PowerBook runs cooler could be its use of its entire skin as a sort of heat sink.

In any case, while the MacBook does run hotter (and significantly hotter under load), I found it very acceptable and certainly not any worse than the older PowerBook.
     
Commodus
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2006, 02:15 PM
 
It's pretty easy to explain why the iMac cools itself better than the MacBook. The iMac's vertical shape and venting design mean that heat naturally tries to escape the case whether the fan is on or not. And because the case has to be larger as a matter of course, Apple can also fit more aggressive (but still quiet) fans to keep the temperature down.
24-inch iMac Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz
     
dreamryche
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Buffalo, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2006, 09:54 PM
 
Also, about the iMac, don't forget that the case was designed for the heat factory that is the G5. If the fan system in there could keep a G5 in check, a Core Duo should be easy work.
     
   
Thread Tools
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,