|
|
Microsoft Access for OS X?
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Will such a product ever be made?
Just wondering...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Altadena
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by The Placid Casual:
Will such a product ever be made?
Just wondering...
Nope, check out Servoy or FileMaker, Access is too closely tied to the Windows OS.
Daniel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by deharlow:
Nope, check out Servoy or FileMaker, Access is too closely tied to the Windows OS.
Daniel
I have been trying out a few DBMS things recently and can't find one to compete with Access or even oracle on the PC...
I have tried Frontbase, Servoy, 4D etc but they just don't cut it for me.
What part of Access is too closely PC related? Surely it is no more PC related than the office suite and they work fine on OS X?
I really need queries in SQL, PHP etc so I don't think Filemaker really cuts it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Altadena
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by The Placid Casual:
I have been trying out a few DBMS things recently and can't find one to compete with Access or even oracle on the PC...
I have tried Frontbase, Servoy, 4D etc but they just don't cut it for me.
What part of Access is too closely PC related? Surely it is no more PC related than the office suite and they work fine on OS X?
I really need queries in SQL, PHP etc so I don't think Filemaker really cuts it...
The Jet database engine that drives Access.
As for other databases have you looked at iAnywhere http://www.ianywhere.com/ or MySQL or Openbase? The combination of iAnywhere included Servoy is pretty powerful.
If none of those work just get Oracle for OS X then.
Daniel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by deharlow:
The Jet database engine that drives Access.
As for other databases have you looked at iAnywhere http://www.ianywhere.com/ or MySQL or Openbase? The combination of iAnywhere included Servoy is pretty powerful.
If none of those work just get Oracle for OS X then.
Daniel
Thanks for the info.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: The Tollbooth Capital of the US
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well I actually spoke to a Microsoft guy at Macworld a while back in NY. He actually stated they would never make Access for Mac because Filemaker is the dominant one for the Mac. And that it's better.
|
"Evil is Powerless If the Good are Unafraid." -Ronald Reagan
Apple and Intel, the dawning of a NEW era.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by The Placid Casual:
I have been trying out a few DBMS things recently and can't find one to compete with Access or even oracle on the PC...
Actually, Access is quite crappy on the PC. It doesn't like large DB's well at all.
What part of Access is too closely PC related? Surely it is no more PC related than the office suite and they work fine on OS X?
The JET database engine, it's very interweaved with the OS (as are most M$ things)
I really need queries in SQL, PHP etc so I don't think Filemaker really cuts it...
Have you checked FM7? Supposedly it can do SQL queries natively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
How about using FMP7 for your desktop databases, MySQL or LassoMySQL for your web backend (via Apache) and Lasso/LDML for middleware?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why on earth would anyone use Lassoo?
Use WebObjects for your high end stuff!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Angus_D:
Why on earth would anyone use Lasso?
Use WebObjects for your high end stuff!
In my case, the client uses FMP for their desktop database as well as for the source of the web data, hence I had to pick a middleware solution that was compatible with that.
WebObjects doesn't work directly with FMP, does it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks for the suggestions... I'll be trying a few out in the next couple of weeks.
I have for the moment however settled on SQL Anywhere 9, so far it works like a charm for what I need.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Altadena
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by selowitch:
In my case, the client uses FMP for their desktop database as well as for the source of the web data, hence I had to pick a middleware solution that was compatible with that.
WebObjects doesn't work directly with FMP, does it?
Check out http://www.360works.com/woof.html it is a plugin for using WO with FM6. I have done several projects with it and it works great.
Daniel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Portsmouth, NH
Status:
Offline
|
|
So is there actually an SQL-based query-builder sort of thing in FileMaker now? The last time I used FileMaker (which was admittedly a long time ago), queries were treated like some sort of dynamic quasi-table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Elkton, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by deharlow:
Nope, check out Servoy or FileMaker, Access is too closely tied to the Windows OS.
Daniel
That's crap. If Excel can be ported in some fashion so can Access.
Damo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: The Tollbooth Capital of the US
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by damosan:
That's crap. If Excel can be ported in some fashion so can Access.
Damo
That's not the point. Filemaker is King on the Mac and Access would have no chance. I had a MacBU guy basically admit that Filemaker was far superior to Access. With that he also said that it would never come to the Mac.
|
"Evil is Powerless If the Good are Unafraid." -Ronald Reagan
Apple and Intel, the dawning of a NEW era.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by typoon:
I had a MacBU guy basically admit that Filemaker was far superior to Access. With that he also said that it would never come to the Mac.
Keep in mind that until 1998, there actually was a version MS Access for the Mac, and it was pretty good, though not as good as Filemaker, IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
What are you talking about? There most certainly wasn't.
I think you're thinking of MS Fox Pro, their other database.
tooki
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cambridge
Status:
Offline
|
|
Man, I remember Fox Pro. My dad used to use that on our Performa 575 for the district science center inventory. I haven't thought about that in years.
Back on topic, have you looked into some of the Cocoa front ends to MySQL. I haven't used them personally, but I've heard of a few people who have. That could just be for administration, though, but combine that with PHP and you'd have a decent web app type thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Altadena
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by selowitch:
Keep in mind that until 1998, there actually was a version MS Access for the Mac, and it was pretty good, though not as good as Filemaker, IMO.
There was Fox Pro but never Access. As for the Excel can be ported so can Access comment, that is incorrect, Excel was a Mac first program, it was ported to Windows.
Daniel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by deharlow:
There was Fox Pro but never Access. As for the Excel can be ported so can Access comment, that is incorrect, Excel was a Mac first program, it was ported to Windows.
Daniel
However from word 6 on they just started porting the whole Windows codebase back over to the mac to keep compatibility between the two Oses. The Excel we have now is a totally different beast to the original one.
I also remember reading somewhere that Apple i.e. Steve Jobs, had basically told MS not to port Access over as Filemaker was perfectly adequate (or something to that effect)
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mbryda:
Actually, Access is quite crappy on the PC. It doesn't like large DB's well at all.
fwiw, I think access is an excellent database program. Yes things slow down in large databases (200MB+) and the multiuser capability is limited. Of course its not intended for large databases or multiuser environments they want you to use SQL Server. They even of upsizing wizards to migrate access dbs to sql. I've used access quite a lot and found it flexible, fast and stable. I particularly like the query tool, as I prefer writing my queries in sql and not using a wizard. too bad MS doesn't use the same T-SQL in access that it has in its bigger brother.
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by deharlow:
There was Fox Pro but never Access. As for the Excel can be ported so can Access comment, that is incorrect, Excel was a Mac first program, it was ported to Windows.
Daniel
Yes, pardon me. I stand corrected. It was Fox Pro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cupertino, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
What's wrong with MySQL? At least it's free. With PHP and Apache already in Mac OS you can have a nice MAMP solution (as opposed to LAMP )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by itai195:
What's wrong with MySQL? At least it's free. With PHP and Apache already in Mac OS you can have a nice MAMP solution (as opposed to LAMP )
I assume there no way of doing a database with Apache/PHP alone; there has to be database like MySQL for PHP to draw data from, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cupertino, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by selowitch:
I assume there no way of doing a database with Apache/PHP alone; there has to be database like MySQL for PHP to draw data from, right?
I think that's a self-answering question. You have to have a database to write a database application. Apache/PHP are the presentation tier. MySQL is a free and relatively easy to use database. There are plenty of reasons not to use it, but it's often worth consideration.
That said, you can also use files for data storage, but it's not recommended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hebburn, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, PHP now comes with SQLite prebundled - so you can do SQL stuff with just PHP. It may be a bit limited though - I use PHP with MySQL because it's what I'm used to. I've not tried the SQLite stuff, so I'm afraid I'm not well enough informed to comment.
|
Just who are Britain? What do they? Who is them? And why?
Formerly Black Book
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Behind the dryer, looking for a matching sock
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by tooki:
What are you talking about? There most certainly wasn't.
I think you're thinking of MS Fox Pro, their other database.
tooki
Correct. And boy, did Fox Pro suck. Years ago, some genius got the idea to use it for our price list at work (we carried about 7,000 products at the time). Youch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Altadena
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by rytc:
However from word 6 on they just started porting the whole Windows codebase back over to the mac to keep compatibility between the two Oses. The Excel we have now is a totally different beast to the original one.
I also remember reading somewhere that Apple i.e. Steve Jobs, had basically told MS not to port Access over as Filemaker was perfectly adequate (or something to that effect)
R
And after MS realized what a piece of junk Word 6 was they split the code base and are not doing just a port of Word/Excel etc. that was one of the reasons for the Mac BU.
Daniel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cupertino, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Black Book:
Well, PHP now comes with SQLite prebundled - so you can do SQL stuff with just PHP. It may be a bit limited though - I use PHP with MySQL because it's what I'm used to. I've not tried the SQLite stuff, so I'm afraid I'm not well enough informed to comment.
Good to know. I haven't used PHP in a few years, I'm a Java man myself
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|