|
|
cars.gov government scam
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Governments Cash for Clunkers program.
The Privacy Act and Security Statement that you agree too when accessing the web site presents the following warnings when:
"This application provides access to the DoT CARS system. When logged on to the CARS system, your computer is considered a Federal computer system and is the property of the U.S. Governement.
Any or all uses of this system [including your computer] and all files on this system may be intercepted, monitored, recorded, copied, audited, inspected, and disclosed to authorized CARS, DoT, and law enforcement personnel, as well as authorized officials of other agencies, both domestic and foreign."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqfuZ7hiap0
Now I'm sure someone made a stupid error when they created this warning, but it is for real.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, WTF ?
Actually, 2 WTFs:
1) WTF to the government putting out user agreements like that
2) WTF to that chick talking about how the government takes over control of your computer
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2008
Status:
Offline
|
|
Consider the source(s): Beck and Goldberg! There misrepresenting (again) so you wingnuts will get all crazy! Consumers DONT go to that website. Dealers do. We all know how trustworthy auto dealers are. The govt. is attempting to protect taxpayer dollars from some car salesmen! Now go get some rest!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by stumblinmike
Consider the source(s): Beck and Goldberg! There misrepresenting (again) so you wingnuts will get all crazy! Consumers DONT go to that website. Dealers do. We all know how trustworthy auto dealers are. The govt. is attempting to protect taxpayer dollars from some car salesmen! Now go get some rest!
You can't just fault Beck and Goldberg for stupid government policy.
That cars.gov disclaimer is total bullsh!t. No business should subject itself to those terms. It would be reckless for any dealership to agree to those terms.
Edit: I'm on cars.gov right now, and I can't find that disclaimer and agreement to come up anywhere.
Does anybody have a direct link ?
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2008
Status:
Offline
|
|
Get used to it. Bless you, President Obama!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2008
Status:
Offline
|
|
Beck/Goldberg fooled you, t! Come over from the dark side...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't know if the text was in the text that you accept or if it was a warning after you click it.
I wouldn't be surprised if someone finally wised up and jumped in and deleted it after the news story.
Originally Posted by turtle777
You can't just fault Beck and Goldberg for stupid government policy.
That cars.gov disclaimer is total bullsh!t. No business should subject itself to those terms. It would be reckless for any dealership to agree to those terms.
Edit: I'm on cars.gov right now, and I can't find that disclaimer and agreement to come up anywhere.
Does anybody have a direct link ?
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
The warning is when you are at cars.gov/dealearsupport and select Submit Transaction. It is very disturbing that the gov would use this type of tactic to gather more personal information from dealers working for carh for clunkers.
Source(s):
cars.gov/dealersupport You can see the submit transaction and click it for yourself. I wouldn't go beyond that though.........
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
K, thanks. Yeah, that's bullsh!t.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
I found this information from someone else:
https://supplierpayments.esc.gov/OA_...gsk17LptZc1LOg
yep it is indeed clear as crystall
This application provides access to the DoT CARS system. When logged on to the CARS system, your computer is considered a Federal computer system and is the property of the United States Government. It is for authorized use only. Users (authorized or unauthorized) have no explicit or implicit expectation of privacy.
Any or all uses of this system and all files on this system may be intercepted, monitored, recorded, copied, audited, inspected, and disclosed to authorized CARS, DoT, and law enforcement personnel, as well as authorized officials of other agencies, both domestic and foreign. By using this system, the user consents to such interception, monitoring, recording, copying, auditing, inspection, and disclosure at the discretion CARS or the DoT personnel.
Unauthorized or improper use of this system may result in administrative disciplinary action and civil and criminal penalties.
Unauthorized attempts to defeat or circumvent security features, to use the system for other than intended purposes, to deny service to authorized users, to access, obtain, alter, damage, or destroy information, or otherwise to interfere with the system or its operation are prohibited. Evidence of such acts may be disclosed to law enforcement authorities and result in criminal prosecution under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-474) and the National Information Infrastructure Protection Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-294), (18 U.S.C. 1030), or other applicable criminal laws.
when you are logged on to the system your portal is considered part of the fed system. when you log out, it is not part of the system [yeah right, but it does not say this]
seem normal and not scary at all.
thanks for finding it =) my google-foo is not as strong today
(
Last edited by Buckaroo; Aug 2, 2009 at 10:30 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
(
Last edited by Buckaroo; Aug 2, 2009 at 10:06 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
seem normal and not scary at all.
WTF ?
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Zip, Boom, Bam
Status:
Offline
|
|
The whole cash for clunkers thing seems pretty misguided to me anyway- like most bright ideas from government.
Ten bucks says that most dealers end up getting shafted in being repaid by the government.
Ten bucks says that we eventually find out that some shady dealers file billions in fraudulent repayment claims, knowing that dumbass Uncle Sam won't have any effective enforcement mechanism in place.
Ten bucks says that despite whatever requirement to destroy the trade-in clunkers, many of them "vanish" with phony 'destroyed' paperwork, and end up right back on the road as under the table resales, or being parted out to keep other clunkers running that much longer- in other words, ZILCH ZIP NADA environmental impact if that was the goal.
If the goal was either environmental or to stimulate car sales and the economy, why the bullcrap provision the buyer must buy a new car only? Someone trading in a used 1992 smoke stack for, say, a 2006 with far better emissions and mileage would be a more LIKELY trade up for many people of average means, and would accomplish the same pretend goal of getting older clunkers off the road. Allowing used vehicles that meet the same emissions trade-up requirements would have met both stated goals just as well as making it a new car only scam.
Like most things from Team Government, it's simply not well thought out, and when the smoke clears, we'll probably find out that the real world does what it always does- end runs around the shortsightedness of idiot bureaucrats. Of course, the nimrods that voted for it in the first place guaranteed never actually read the bill.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 46 & 2
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by CRASH HARDDRIVE
Ten bucks says that despite whatever requirement to destroy the trade-in clunkers, many of them "vanish" with phony 'destroyed' paperwork, and end up right back on the road as under the table resales, or being parted out to keep other clunkers running that much longer- in other words, ZILCH ZIP NADA environmental impact if that was the goal.
No bet on that, I know of one dealer that's stripping the vehicles for parts and destroying the body.
|
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
- Thomas Paine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2008
Status:
Offline
|
|
The party of NO in action...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Zip, Boom, Bam
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by stumblinmike
The party of NO in action...
Vs. the party of NO BRAINS inaction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2008
Status:
Offline
|
|
That's the best you got? Show me some more indignation!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: I don't know anymore!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by CRASH HARDDRIVE
The whole cash for clunkers thing seems pretty misguided to me anyway- like most bright ideas from government.
Ten bucks says that most dealers end up getting shafted in being repaid by the government.
Ten bucks says that we eventually find out that some shady dealers file billions in fraudulent repayment claims, knowing that dumbass Uncle Sam won't have any effective enforcement mechanism in place.
Ten bucks says that despite whatever requirement to destroy the trade-in clunkers, many of them "vanish" with phony 'destroyed' paperwork, and end up right back on the road as under the table resales, or being parted out to keep other clunkers running that much longer- in other words, ZILCH ZIP NADA environmental impact if that was the goal.
If the goal was either environmental or to stimulate car sales and the economy, why the bullcrap provision the buyer must buy a new car only? Someone trading in a used 1992 smoke stack for, say, a 2006 with far better emissions and mileage would be a more LIKELY trade up for many people of average means, and would accomplish the same pretend goal of getting older clunkers off the road. Allowing used vehicles that meet the same emissions trade-up requirements would have met both stated goals just as well as making it a new car only scam.
Like most things from Team Government, it's simply not well thought out, and when the smoke clears, we'll probably find out that the real world does what it always does- end runs around the shortsightedness of idiot bureaucrats. Of course, the nimrods that voted for it in the first place guaranteed never actually read the bill.
But you're an honest, straight-up guy, right, and private businesses would never screw anybody.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Instead of wrecking the clunkers, couldn't they be collected by state governments and then given over to the homeless to live in?
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm just curious about the indignation here.
How or why is this any different than government powers re: national security?
When you're logged on to the federal system, your computer is considered a "federal computer." Fine, that's freaky. But under the auspices of national security they can do the same thing, can't they? Exception with no action taken re: logging on to a federal government database?
What am I missing here? You log into a federal database, and your **** is theirs for that duration. How is this more scary than, you know, their powers under national security?
greg
|
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton
What am I missing here? You log into a federal database, and your **** is theirs for that duration. How is this more scary than, you know, their powers under national security?
Difference: the former can be avoided (by choice), the latter can't.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
Difference: the former can be avoided (by choice), the latter can't.
-t
Huh? Are you saying the government can't use their national security powers to target someone who may be innocent of any wrongdoing? Do you need to be a "threat to national security" before those powers can be used against you?
Isn't that, like, counter-intuitive? How can you be determined to be a threat if they first can't use their national security powers to track your calls/internet usage/whatever? I seem to remember quite a few people who have been arrested or in some way detained/warned about their "private activities" but who had done nothing that could result in charges.
greg
|
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: type 13 planet
Status:
Offline
|
|
I still can't believe that such engineering masterpieces (combustible engines) are being willfully destroyed as some sort of "verification" process. Seems like such an asinine waste of technology. But hey, **** it. If it gets a new Ford on the road and out of the showroom, it was "WORTH" it.
The one ****ING thing that is universally (and without prompting, education or incentive) recycled the world over, and we destroy them and sell the scrap to China. Awesome.
|
New, Improved and Legal in 50 States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
This has already affected charities like Big Brothers/Sisters and the others that people were donating cars to. (rule of unintended consequences at work)
|
45/47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by CRASH HARDDRIVE
The whole cash for clunkers thing seems pretty misguided to me anyway- like most bright ideas from government.
Misguided, yes. But quite effective. I wish even half of government programs were as effective and successful as this one has proven to be.
Ten bucks says that most dealers end up getting shafted in being repaid by the government.
If that were the case, how could they possibly have blown through their entire budget in less than a week? Sure there's still probably a risk of this, but I wouldn't count on it.
Ten bucks says that we eventually find out that some shady dealers file billions in fraudulent repayment claims, knowing that dumbass Uncle Sam won't have any effective enforcement mechanism in place.
Repayment requires matching VIN numbers from both the car and the engine. (I don't have the exact details, but the burden of proof is definitely on the dealers in claiming the funds.)
Ten bucks says that despite whatever requirement to destroy the trade-in clunkers, many of them "vanish" with phony 'destroyed' paperwork, and end up right back on the road as under the table resales, or being parted out to keep other clunkers running that much longer- in other words, ZILCH ZIP NADA environmental impact if that was the goal.
It's possible, but again, fairly extensive documentation (as in over 100 pages) is required for every single car traded in through this program.
If the goal was either environmental or to stimulate car sales and the economy, why the bullcrap provision the buyer must buy a new car only? Someone trading in a used 1992 smoke stack for, say, a 2006 with far better emissions and mileage would be a more LIKELY trade up for many people of average means, and would accomplish the same pretend goal of getting older clunkers off the road. Allowing used vehicles that meet the same emissions trade-up requirements would have met both stated goals just as well as making it a new car only scam.
Because new cars stimulate the economy far more than used cars. And yes, trading in for a used car is more likely, that's why it doesn't require the added incentive. This program, however, has been a tremendous boon for the dealers who want to sell more new cars in order to even come close to meeting their sales numbers from last year, and the manufacturers who are utterly dependent on the sale of new cars over used cars to continue existing.
Like most things from Team Government, it's simply not well thought out, and when the smoke clears, we'll probably find out that the real world does what it always does- end runs around the shortsightedness of idiot bureaucrats. Of course, the nimrods that voted for it in the first place guaranteed never actually read the bill.
Entirely possible, but everything I've heard so far suggests otherwise. The dealers are very happy with this program, and it is doing a good job of stimulating multiple sectors of the economy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton
Huh? Are you saying the government can't use their national security powers to target someone who may be innocent of any wrongdoing? Do you need to be a "threat to national security" before those powers can be used against you?
Isn't that, like, counter-intuitive? How can you be determined to be a threat if they first can't use their national security powers to track your calls/internet usage/whatever? I seem to remember quite a few people who have been arrested or in some way detained/warned about their "private activities" but who had done nothing that could result in charges.
greg
You misunderstand.
You have a choice in logging in to Federal websites and subjecting yourself to those terms.
You DO NOT have a choice on the government's power under national security be abused to infringe on your privacy.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Chongo
This has already affected charities like Big Brothers/Sisters and the others that people were donating cars to. (rule of unintended consequences at work)
Donating to Big Brothers/Sisters might make you feel all warm and tingly inside, but it does precisely jack squat for the economy. The government's current priority is reviving the US economy, and this program is doing a good job of helping with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
(Full disclosure: my family is in the auto dealer business.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: type 13 planet
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Chongo
This has already affected charities like Big Brothers/Sisters and the others that people were donating cars to. (rule of unintended consequences at work)
Eh, I don't know enough about them to care. Middle-men as far as I'm concerned.
|
New, Improved and Legal in 50 States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
You misunderstand.
You have a choice in logging in to Federal websites and subjecting yourself to those terms.
You DO NOT have a choice on the government's power under national security be abused to infringe on your privacy.
-t
Ummmm... right. That's what I was thinking.
Soooo... why the big fuss about this, but not about national security powers? Last time I checked around here the response seemed to be "oh well, I'm not a terrorist so it doesn't affect me."
Confusing?
greg
|
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm against some of the power abuse in the name of national security.
But that's not what this thread is about, is it ?
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your Anus
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
I'm on cars.gov right now, and I can't find that disclaimer and agreement to come up anywhere.
Does anybody have a direct link ?
-t
The gubment now has control of your computer, good job.
|
My sig is 1 pixel too big.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status:
Offline
|
|
Agreed. Just seemed weird to me, because I haven't seen this much outrage over something like national security powers. Especially so since this instance seems very limited and, in some ways, somewhat justified.
(In the sense that people using a federal database are subject to a high level of scrutiny.)
On that note, though, would be interested to find out whether these disclaimer could be used to catch people, say, with child pornography or some other illegal activity. It would be a great "screener" for illegal activity!
greg
|
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by stumblinmike
Consider the source(s): Beck and Goldberg! There misrepresenting (again) so you wingnuts will get all crazy! Consumers DONT go to that website. Dealers do. We all know how trustworthy auto dealers are. The govt. is attempting to protect taxpayer dollars from some car salesmen! Now go get some rest!
Of course consumers DON'T go to that website. Consumers GO TO THE DEALERS! You know, the ones who keep the files of their consumers on their computer/Federal property.
Pelosi and Reid! Theirere misrepresenting (again) so you pinko-commie libs will get all frenzied about another Krisiss. We all know how trustworthy the government is; after all it was only what... 8 months ago that we were talking about sivil rights abuses, privassy violation, waiste, frod, Krisiss sales, etc...
|
ebuddy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by pooka
I still can't believe that such engineering masterpieces (combustible engines) are being willfully destroyed as some sort of "verification" process. Seems like such an asinine waste of technology. But hey, **** it. If it gets a new Ford on the road and out of the showroom, it was "WORTH" it.
The one ****ING thing that is universally (and without prompting, education or incentive) recycled the world over, and we destroy them and sell the scrap to China. Awesome.
I couldn't agree with you more. On top of the colossal mindfxxx you cited, we're destroying a product only those with less money will be able to afford while bloating costs in the used car market. Asinine.
|
ebuddy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Zip, Boom, Bam
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OldManMac
But you're an honest, straight-up guy, right, and private businesses would never screw anybody.
That made no sense whatsoever.
Reading posts from you is a bit like spam emails. One suspects there might actually be some human brain activity behind it rather than just random bot-generated spew, but just barely. I almost halfway expect you pitch a scheme to deposit $12.6 million dollars in my account from whichever member of the Zimbabwe royal family you represent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Zip, Boom, Bam
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by nonhuman
Misguided, yes. But quite effective. I wish even half of government programs were as effective and successful as this one has proven to be.
Well, I guess t'would be nice if all other govt programs would blow through their budgets in a week, rather than wasting astronomically higher amounts over decades.
If that were the case, how could they possibly have blown through their entire budget in less than a week? Sure there's still probably a risk of this, but I wouldn't count on it.
I'd be very happy to be wrong and lose my ten dollar bets.
But somehow I'm not that impressed by a program that stimulates the economy in a week by relying on taxpayer funded destruction of working automobiles, so that people with enough money to buy a new car can get one. Now, if we call it "stimulating auto sales, at least for a week or two"- sure, I guess by that measure it's a huge success.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the verge of insanity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ebuddy
Of course consumers DON'T go to that website. Consumers GO TO THE DEALERS! You know, the ones who keep the files of their consumers on their computer/Federal property.
Pelosi and Reid! Theirere misrepresenting (again) so you pinko-commie libs will get all frenzied about another Krisiss. We all know how trustworthy the government is; after all it was only what... 8 months ago that we were talking about sivil rights abuses, privassy violation, waiste, frod, Krisiss sales, etc...
I'll chalk this up to you drinking since your arguments (even if wrong at times) are much more thought out and articulated.
|
I like my water with hops, malt, hops, yeast, and hops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the verge of insanity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by CRASH HARDDRIVE
That made no sense whatsoever.
Reading posts from you is a bit like spam emails. One suspects there might actually be some human brain activity behind it rather than just random bot-generated spew, but just barely. I almost halfway expect you pitch a scheme to deposit $12.6 million dollars in my account from whichever member of the Zimbabwe royal family you represent.
While he is pretty far left, there are times where he writes good sense. However, like any person that leans to far in one direction, they may fall over.
|
I like my water with hops, malt, hops, yeast, and hops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Rumor
I'll chalk this up to you drinking since your arguments (even if wrong at times) are much more thought out and articulated.
I appreciate the kudos Rumor. I wish I could say I was drinking, but the sad fact of the matter is that I simply lack patience for the kind of mindless tripe that goes on around here sometimes. Don't get me wrong, I have tons of patience for stupid because of course I can't be expected to be right all the time.
Stupid and belligerent, now that's just intolerable.
|
ebuddy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2008
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ebuddy
Stupid and belligerent, now that's just intolerable.
You've made Glen Beck very proud, buddy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by stumblinmike
You've made Glen Beck very proud, buddy.
fgpo'uftrydlgMichaelMooreih[l,goerdsaxzopklfg
|
ebuddy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2008
Status:
Offline
|
|
Stop your drinking, man. You have a dearth of brain cells to begin with!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by stumblinmike
Stop your drinking, man. You have a dearth of brain cells to begin with!
pblkutyeopsd'pamncbv
|
ebuddy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by stumblinmike
Stop your drinking, man. You have a dearth of brain cells to begin with!
This coming from the guy that posts nothing but lame, worthless one-liners followed by an emoticon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by CRASH HARDDRIVE
The whole cash for clunkers thing seems pretty misguided to me anyway- like most bright ideas from government.
Do you work in government?
If not, stop being a busybody because you have no basis for criticizing them. Put your money where your mouth is and get yourself elected and then you can talk.
greg
|
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton
Do you work in government?
If not, stop being a busybody because you have no basis for criticizing them. Put your money where your mouth is and get yourself elected and then you can talk.
greg
I guess I should stop talking badly about drug dealers, rapists, criminals etc...
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|