|
|
Why do some people still use letters to refer to display resolutions?
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
You know what I mean. It's much simpler to say 1650 x 1280 than WXSGA+. Why do some in the computer industry continue using those meaningless letter combinations? Just tell me how many pixels there are!
Chris
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pretentiously Retired.
Status:
Offline
|
|
I dunno. I never heard of such things, but some people have an easier time remembering letters than numbers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
AFAIK, it's to maintain a few standards. I assume that writing graphics card drivers which operate at 1280 x 1024 is easier than writing drivers which operate at 1278 x 1022, 1280 x 1024 and 1282 x 1026.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Doofy, I don't disagree with you. There are probably good reasons to have some standard sizes. But in marketing to consumers (me), don't make me try to memorize and interpret wacky letter combinations. Just say 1024 x 768.
Chris
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by chabig
There are probably good reasons to have some standard sizes. But in marketing to consumers (me), don't make me try to memorize and interpret wacky letter combinations. Just say 1024 x 768.
I agree. It's probably some industry stuff which has spilled out into the wild. I can only remember something like three of them anyways. Too busy remembering other numbers. Like my 15,000 PINs. Or those in the format of "34C".
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Durham, NC
Status:
Offline
|
|
I agree with you, chabig. Every once in a while I see an Engadget post mentioning that some laptop has "WUXGA", and all I can think is "WTF? Just say the resolution."
From Wikipedia's WUXGA page:
Display Resolutions
QVGA | VGA | SVGA| XGA | WXGA | SXGA | WSXGA or WXGA+ | SXGA+ | WSXGA+ | UXGA | WUXGA | QXGA | WQXGA | QSXGA | WQSXGA | QUXGA | WQUXGA |
HXGA | WHXGA | HSXGA | WHSXGA | HUXGA | WHUXGA,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: President Skroob's Office
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have never heard anyone say that either.
|
"She's gone from suck to blow!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hayesk
|
|
I haven't heard a person say it in a long time, but ads still say that instead of the actual resolution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston
Status:
Offline
|
|
I haven't heard anyone use letters since VGA
|
~Mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: The Intertube
Status:
Offline
|
|
VGA.... SVGA... XGA... then i lost count.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Miami Beach
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by production_coordinator
My monitor goes to 11
Well played.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: The Intertube
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
They're a lot easier and quicker for me to type since they're shorter and I don't have to read up to the number keys.
There are only about a half dozen common ones in current usage: XGA, WXGA (poorly defined), SXGA (poorly defined), SXGA+, WSXGA+, UXGA, and WUXGA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|