|
|
What Linux distro is most Mac-like?
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm interested in getting a second machine to try out Linux. Which distribution is most Mac-like in look and function? I'm obviously looking for seamlessness, GUI for nasty command line stuff and a refined feature-set.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere in the land surrouding Fenway Park
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by gunnar:
I'm interested in getting a second machine to try out Linux. Which distribution is most Mac-like in look and function? I'm obviously looking for seamlessness, GUI for nasty command line stuff and a refined feature-set.
Well the "look and function" part is kind of universal. I mean that is totally dependant on the Window Manager you choose to use, and any WM can be installed on pretty much any distro of Linux.
Your best bet is probally KDE on Fedora, because of its ease of installation and the fact that KDE comes with a full fledged desktop manager and environment, plus a ton of apps.
I use Gentoo + XFCE personally because its so lightweight, but the inital system setup can be a pain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
The distribution is pretty much independent of the GUI, so if I were you I'd be asking which GUI is best. The answer: It depends on who you ask. You can try out both of the major ones (KDE and Gnome) for free. In fact you can use KDE in OS X via fink. Fink has Gnome too, but it's not a recent version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
But I don't think the GUIs are remotely close to being called 'Mac-like.' Just varying degrees of 'oh, cool' and 'WTF were they thinking?'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Youngsville, NC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why don't you just go tool around in the terminal for a while, then close it and continue to use the finder as you always have, confident that you know just a little more about Linux.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm not interested in the terminal, hence the qualifier "Mac-like". I'm just interested in seeing how the other half lives but I want a moderately easy entry point and to see if there's particular desktop environments that are approaching the Mac quality and perhaps have features that are better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sitting in front of computer
Status:
Offline
|
|
I like SuSE with KDE 3. Thats pretty much acceptable, and on par with windows for ease of use
|
I free'd my mind... now it won't come back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richmond,Va
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by gunnar:
I'm interested in getting a second machine to try out Linux. Which distribution is most Mac-like in look and function? I'm obviously looking for seamlessness, GUI for nasty command line stuff and a refined feature-set.
What kind of system are you going to get? PC or Mac.
I like Mandrake and Red Hat using KDE on a PC.
With a Mac you are limited on what you can have without having to do a bunch of compiling. On a Mac, I have never had a problem getting Yellow Dog to work. Mandrake PPC installed on a CRT iMac without any problems but I couldn't get video to work on two different iBooks.
Yellow Dog runs on my PowerMac 6500 without any problems. Not the fastest in the world but it works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've been running SuSE and GNOME. It is more Mac like than KDE and in fact quite charming. GNOME was going to implement spatial file browsing IIRC so you can't get much more Mac like than that!
|
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Madison
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by voodoo:
I've been running SuSE and GNOME. It is more Mac like than KDE and in fact quite charming. GNOME was going to implement spatial file browsing IIRC so you can't get much more Mac like than that!
Agreed. The gnome GUI is just great from a design standpoint. It isn't as polished as OS X, but hold a lot of potential. KDE is more of a windows clone, but seems a lot more "finished" and stable in my opinion. I find it to be pretty ugly though. Gnome is pretty attractive.
|
Is it not reasonable to anticipate that our understanding of the human mind would be aided greatly by knowing the purpose for which it was designed?
-George C. Williams
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richmond,Va
Status:
Offline
|
|
I downloaded Suse Linux 9.1 LiveCD last night. It a bootable CD that you can run the full distro off of. This has got to be the best looking Linux I've ever used. I think this version was just released a few days ago. KDE looks great in this version and it feels like there has been some work put into it. I've never been a big fan of GNOME. It just depends on personal preference.
I booted off the CD and it configured my entire system. It recognized my internet connection and even my digital camera. Not bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Is there a Window Manager that puts the menu bar at the top of the screen like Mac OS instead of the top of every window?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Austria
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you want your menubar on top of the screen, you should install a distribution with KDE 3.2, such as Mandrake Linux 10, Suse Linux 9.1 or Fedora Core 2 (not yet released). Install only KDE applications (e.g. Konqueror, KMail and KOffice for browsing, email and office, respectively), because this won't work with other applications. Then use the following instructions:
< http://wiki.kdenews.org/tiki-index.p...-like+Menu+Bar>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
I would like to try Linux as well, but dual boot it on my Powerbook G4.
Anyone recommend anything? Doesn't have to be mac like, I just want to be able to compile most anything out of box.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richmond,Va
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by timmerk:
I would like to try Linux as well, but dual boot it on my Powerbook G4.
Anyone recommend anything? Doesn't have to be mac like, I just want to be able to compile most anything out of box.
Thanks!
Yellow Dog would probably be your best bet. If your PB is a 17" you are most likely out of luck. YDL doesn't support it. I tried looking at their site to make sure but it seems to be down at the moment. You could try Mandrake PPC but you would probably have a tough time getting the video to work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Doesn't someone make a livecd for macs? I thought it was suse but I can't find it for anything but i386. Anyone know a link? Or am I crazy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by gunnar:
Is there a Window Manager that puts the menu bar at the top of the screen like Mac OS instead of the top of every window?
Yes in GNOME at least.
|
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|