|
|
Is there a difference between 1.5 GB and 2GB
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: India
Status:
Offline
|
|
[FONT="Comic Sans MS"]
since apple charges so much on random acces memory (ram)
i thought i'd just go third partei- as many others do (right? )
so what advantages do i have if i go 2GB instead of 1.5 GB ???
what kind of improvements will i c in performance? i read sum ppl said osx really uses extra ram
thanks in advance for any helpful answers
edit: ps, price aside- is there advantage/ disadvantage in getting an external Hd instead of upgrading from apple store? apart from the integration etc..
[/FONT]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Welcome to the MacNN Forums! And aside from the flip answer ("Yes, half a gigabite!") I can tell you that OS X likes RAM, the more the better, and unlike Windows, it doesn't have a particular "sweet spot" above which adding RAM doesn't help.
You can easily save lots and lots of money by simply buying the appropriate RAM from a third party vendor. It is apparently not difficult on any of the Intel Macs to add RAM, so it should not be too scary. But go with a known vendor, like Kingston, Crucial, Corsair, Mushkin, and the other well known brands rather than "Bob's RAM and Storm Door Company." You'll be a lot happier knowing you can depend on the product you buy.
|
Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
heyendo, welcome.......
about the second point;
if im not mistaken, isnt an external hd real slow- atleast in comparison to a internal 1 ??? FW 400 isnt tht fast
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
Firewire 400 is more than fast enough for everything but hardcore video editing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Depends how hardcore you want to get.... I often use an ext HD for video editing (DV), using multicam in FCP. With 4 cams simultaneously playing, the speed of FW400 was fine. When I bumped it up to 7, however, FW400 could not handle it
|
iMac Core Duo 1.83 Ghz | 1.25GB RAM | 160HD, MacBook Core Duo 1.83 Ghz | 13.3" | 60HD | 1.0GB RAM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
so FW400 is fast, doesnt 400 stand for 400mb/s ? apart from the fact that it wont reach tht speed isnt it still slow? well aparantly not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
don't buy your external HD, if you buy one, from Apple. way over price. i bought a 250gb drive to backup my iMac's 250gb for $85 shipped from dealmac.com or dealnews.com deals and put it in a standard firewire 400/USB 2.0 external HD case. total cost less than $150.
|
Looking forward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|