 |
 |
Garageband 2.0 loops same as 1.0?
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Orlando, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hi fellow Mac'ers.
Just wondered: Are the GB loops for 2.0 the same set as 1.0?
Thanks,
JMelrose
|
|
“A man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them.” -Mark Twain
Current rig: 15" MBP i7 2.6Ghz 16GB RAM 1TB Flash Drive
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Good question. I'd like to know that, too.
I'd be upgrading mostly for Garageband.
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Orlando, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
Anyone know where the software instruments are stored? I'd like to remove them since I'm strictly using loops at this point and would love to regain the multi-GBs of HD space.
|
|
“A man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them.” -Mark Twain
Current rig: 15" MBP i7 2.6Ghz 16GB RAM 1TB Flash Drive
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Orlando, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, there does seem to be some difference, although I can't tell how far it goes. GB 2.0 does a conversion of GB 1.0 loops to 2.0 during installation apparently. Anyone know anything more?
|
|
“A man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them.” -Mark Twain
Current rig: 15" MBP i7 2.6Ghz 16GB RAM 1TB Flash Drive
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Status:
Offline
|
|
Start in /Library/Application Support/GarageBand/Instrument Library, and poke around a few layers deeper.
Edit: in response to jmelrose...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top