|
|
Best way to backup 600GB?
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, I got a lotta stuff to backup, and wanted to tap into the MacNN knowledge base.
I figure I need to get some sort of tape drive.
Not loosing everything is obviously my priority, so I guess you could say "robustness" is first on the list of importance. Second would be easy availability of media.
Software recommends would be appreciated as well. I have Retrospect and find it... lacking.
Thanks much!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
"I start fires!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks.
I'm still looking for a tape solution I think. I don't need regular access to the data. Just in an emergency.
That is a nice drive though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Near Antietam Creek
Status:
Offline
|
|
Is this a one-shot archive? If you have a SuperDrive, I'd back-up to that. While I realize that it would take around 150 DVD-Rs, DVD-Rs can be found for around a U$1 in quantity. Another benefit: the data can be read in any Mac with a DVD drive.
Something like these AIT drives would work. They run from $850-$1200 and each AIT1 tape (holding 33GBs uncompressed--90 compressed) is around $50.
Now, if you plan to implement a tape drive into a weekly back-up scheme, then I'd go for an AIT. But for a one shot archive, DVD-Rs are the way I'd choose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cali
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you dont go with DvD-R then I would do the terabyte drive listed above.
You will spend over $1K either way and why not have a drive that is faster and more easily accessible.
Force
|
Force
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by forcelite:
If you dont go with DvD-R then I would do the terabyte drive listed above.
You will spend over $1K either way and why not have a drive that is faster and more easily accessible.
[edit: removed my stupidity]
Thanks everyone for your responses!
I may be able to get a deal on a VXA-1 drive. Does anyone have any comments about it vs. the AIT?
[edit: Answering my own question]
(
Last edited by subego; Feb 19, 2004 at 12:23 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've been using DLT for the last 5 years, and have never had a single problem with them. We recently moved to SDLT, which has a higher capacity. They're expensive, but they work great.
|
--
Donald Roeber
Generating 2048 bits of randomness...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|