|
|
Koontz or King or Blank?
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: retired
Status:
Offline
|
|
Do You prefer Dean Koontz, Stephen King or someone else that writes in this genre.
Just curious.
Thanx
(
Last edited by Atomic Rooster; Jan 23, 2008 at 03:24 AM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status:
Offline
|
|
Koontz. King takes so long "building" the scene
|
we don't have time to stop for gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
Don't like Koontz at all. I do like King but some of his books were clunkers and/or really slow in starting.
I don't have a favorite author, if the book's premise is interesting, I'll generally by it. There's only a handful of author's that I'll not buy from and Koontz falls into that category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The back of the room
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've read more Koontz, so I guess I'll go with him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Status:
Offline
|
|
Chuck Palahniuk... you can always expect a @#&@ed up twist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Koontz. He's an exceptional writer, one of the best of our time without doubt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY²
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm a big Koontz fan and have read a lot of his books.
I have only read a handful of King and he is a great writer, but his stories didn't interest me as much as Koontz's have.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status:
Offline
|
|
I liked koontz's books at first, but then realized they were very formulaic and they got boring.
so King.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by MacinTommy
Chuck Palahniuk... you can always expect a @#&@ed up twist.
I have his book "Haunted" though I haven't started reading it yet. Didn't he come up with Fight Club?
|
-How pumped would you be driving home from work, knowing someplace in your house there's a monkey you're gonna battle?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by cSurfr
I have his book "Haunted" though I haven't started reading it yet. Didn't he come up with Fight Club?
Yeah he did. I read a lot of his books in high school yet for book reports... I REALLY had to tone down my book reports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Garden of Paradise Motel, Suite 3D
Status:
Offline
|
|
Having read everything that both of them has ever written (or it SEEMS like it) and being a lifelong fan of both, I'm looking for a new set of folks.
King has absolutely lost it (he LIKED Frank Darabont's ending for "The Mist") and has absolute contempt for his fans, and the world in general. He's ended up bitter and disenfranchised, along with a bunch of boomers.
Koontz "Husband" just did it for me. The Frankenstein things were intriguing, but he's just at the end of his run, I think. I'm not sure he'll bounce back from the last few efforts.
So, when I get some time (when my kids are 18) I'll end up finding the next big read. Until then, I'm probably going to avoid these guys if I can manage to keep myself away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
I chose Koontz. I like the Odd Thomas series and am looking forward to the next one.
But then this is very true...
Originally Posted by andi*pandi
I liked koontz's books at first, but then realized they were very formulaic and they got boring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status:
Offline
|
|
Koontz. I really liked Phantoms, which was the first book of his that I read.
I still have a few of his lying on the shelf, unread. Too many in the queue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't think I've ever read a book by either that, when finished, didn't make me hate myself for wasting my time.
Actually, I'll consider King's Gunslinger series as "a book" for that purpose. The first few books were good-to-solid; the ones after his accident made me want to stab myself in the eye. Clearly had no interest in writing them at that point.
But I don't really have any other authors of that "genre" to offer. I think I just consider the entire genre a waste of time in general.
greg
|
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by olePigeon
Lovecraft.
Argh, beat me to it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Clive Barker for style.
Richard Laymon for gore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: retired
Status:
Offline
|
|
I liked King's latest, 'Cell'. I think it's his best in a while. He's had lots of clunkers. Christine and Maximum Overdrive come to mind. His short stories have been made into his best movies.
I just finished Koontz's 'Darkest Evening of the Year' which I thought was very good. His 'Odd' series and 'Seize the Night' are very good also. Just got into his books and luckily have many to look forward to.
I just wanted to find out from you guys some other writers of their genre so I can enjoy more reading stuffs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Koontz and Lovecraft are the only authors in the genre that I read (and I've read just about everything either of them wrote), so I wouldn't mind finding some comparable authors also... however, I'm skeptical that I'd find anyone that came close to their writing styles. Both of them really are exceptional.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
Status:
Offline
|
|
Koontz. I relate to the west coast settings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Parker, Colorado
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Parker, Colorado
Status:
Offline
|
|
King is incapable of resolving a story without some trite crap ending. I once enjoyed his books but it occurred to that after I finished every book (Salem's Lot and The Shining aside) I thought "Huh, That ending was incredibly weak." After the pattern became more pronounced through the late 80's and into the 90's I just gave up. I find it implausible that he has become a good writer of horror books in the intervening time.
Koontz is better for the most part, but found his stuff tired after a while. Quit on Dean about a decade ago after False Memory, but don't have the same disdain for him that I do King. Stephen King. Gah. Just the name will keep me from buying a book or seeing a movie.
Give Dean the nod over Steve.
Clive Barker is at his best for me when he is epic: Weaveworld is among my all time favorites and Imajica was very very good. Barker's other stuff is very readable as well, but I love the dark fantasy horror epic that he can spin. I like Barker a lot.
Lovecraft. Pffft. Nothing beats Lovecraft.
|
Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 46 & 2
Status:
Offline
|
|
We're talking specifically horror? Richard Laymon and Lovecraft.
If you mean Sci-fi/fantasy fiction, in general, Orson Scott Card, Robin Hobb, and George R. Martin (and I'm partial to Robert Jordan too, sue me).
|
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
- Thomas Paine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: 51°30′28″N 00°07′41″W
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you're talking about the 'Horror' genre, then I vote for HP Lovecraft and Clive Barker. No question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm surprised that so many people have brought up Clive Barker. As much as I like his work, he hasn't really written any horror since Books of Blood, it's mostly fantasy with some dark elements.
Palahniuk, I don't know. I think he's wildly overrated. Haunted wasn't horror, I'd call it gross‑out fiction, if anything.
King just sucks. Gunslinger and Eyes of the Dragon were okay, overall I find his characters boring and the plots predictable.
Don't know much about Koontz. I think I have a book or two by him somewhere, can't remember which. Saw an interview with him on TV at one time, interesting guy.
To be honest, I'm hard pressed to come up with any particular horror writer. Most of the books I have in the genre have been written by different people, each is usually the only book I have by that writer. I think I have more horror anthologies than I do single‑author works, actually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Shaddim
If you mean Sci-fi/fantasy fiction, in general, Orson Scott Card, Robin Hobb, and George R. Martin (and I'm partial to Robert Jordan too, sue me).
Consider yourself sued.
Did you know he died last year? So much for the Wheel of Time.
greg
|
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|