Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Notebooks > opinion on pismo ram upgrade

opinion on pismo ram upgrade
Thread Tools
niacin
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 11, 2002, 07:31 AM
 
i'm currently running a pismo 400 with 192 mb ram.
os 9 performance is satisfactory, but under os x, the computer is slow as hell... even opening finder windows is a pain because of the time lag

i'm thinking of putting in a new slab of either 256 or 512mb ram, but wonder if this will help boost the performance of the mac significantly especially under os x, or is my computer slow just because the processor is slow?

would appreciate any form of input. thanks!!
     
Timo
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: New York City
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 11, 2002, 09:15 AM
 
I put a 512mb in my Pismo (500), and it made a big difference.

I use a dual gig at work, maxed out. When I go home to the pismo, it chuggs along nicely.

YMMV.

<small>[ 07-11-2002, 09:15 AM: Message edited by: Timo ]</small>
     
Moderator
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NYNY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 11, 2002, 11:29 AM
 
I feel your pain....192 just won't cut it in X...512MB, whether its 2 256's or whatever..should make a noticeable difference...although its still won't blaze. You also ought to think about the G4 upgrade.
"Well done is better than well said." -BF
Kitchenall
     
seanyepez
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Pleasanton, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 11, 2002, 05:55 PM
 
512 megabytes of memory makes a 400-megahertz Pismo usable under OS X. I highly recommend you go for a 256-megabyte module to bring your computer's memory levels to a more reasonable 384 megabytes.
     
JediMac
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NOWHERE
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 11, 2002, 09:21 PM
 
What is the MAX upgrade? I have a Pismo 400 rev2
     
ddiokno
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: The Valley of the Sun
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 11, 2002, 09:50 PM
 
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Originally posted by JediMac:
<strong>What is the MAX upgrade? I have a Pismo 400 rev2</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Hi Jedimac,
Currently, 1GB (two 512MB PC100 SoDimms --- PC133 will work as well, but you'll see no benefit, as the controller will utilize it as if it were PC100). Here is a good <a href="http://www.transintl.com/technotes/installram_pismo.htm" target="_blank">tutorial/overview</a> for upgrading the ram yourself.
good luck,
dave

edit -- dumb typos --

<small>[ 07-11-2002, 09:53 PM: Message edited by: ddiokno ]</small>
     
niacin  (op)
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 11, 2002, 11:06 PM
 
thanks guys

seanyepez, you say that 512mbs is good, yet you ask me to upgrade only 256mb, why? btw, if 512mb can bring the pismo up to a 'usable' level, than i'm game for it! my only concern previously is that the bottleneck was with the processor and not the ram, and whether 512 mb would be an overkill - in which case i would just got for the 256 upgrade.

can't afford the G4 upgrade for now ((((

my next computer purchase has to be a PC because i need to run Autocad and 3ds.. so no choice.. but i still love this book and won't let it go! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />
     
ebolla
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 12, 2002, 09:54 AM
 
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">my next computer purchase has to be a PC because i need to run Autocad and 3ds.. so no choice.. but i still love this book and won't let it go! </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">YUK-
check out FormZ or Archicad if you want good drafting or 3D modeling for the Mac. I run Autocad on Virtual PC on my pismo without too much trouble.
Autocad 3D is even pretty slow on a PC so it isnt much of a sacrifice. The crossplatform software is much more powerful and FASTER- check them out and you might get to keep your Mac.
     
niacin  (op)
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 12, 2002, 10:29 AM
 
hey ebolla,

i currently do use formZ extensively on my mac, it's done me wonders - but the rendering and animation functions just don't cut it when compared to 3ds.
as for cadding - i haven't tried archicad - but most of the rest of the architecture world uses autocad - i have no choice but to adhere as much, or as little in this case, as i can. running vpc is a possibility - but it just doesn't match up to running things native. as for autocad being slow on a pc? not when you are running it on an athlon 1.xGhz compared to G3/400.

not to start a platform war here, and i'm a big mac fan myself, hell i took a big risk when i decided to switch platforms 2 years ago, but there are some things that i think the pc still does better. to each his own, i'd like to have the best of both worlds <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />

btw, ebolla, since you use formZ also. last semester i tried rendering this super big and complicated file on formZ 3.8 for Mac on the school's public G4/733s, 256mb ram. They couldn't render those things at all, just sat there. i left them there for almost 3 days.
Managed to render the same file though on a pc - think it was a PIII with 512mb ram - did the job in 14 hours.
I've noticed that FormZ just doesn't run as fast on a mac. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="frown.gif" />
     
Moderator
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NYNY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 12, 2002, 05:09 PM
 
I think he suggested 256 for cost purposes....512 sticks cost a lot more per MB of RAM. At 384 (total) you'll still notice a solid difference, and save some cash to boot.
"Well done is better than well said." -BF
Kitchenall
     
tooki
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 12, 2002, 07:15 PM
 
If you're running OS X full-time, I'd take it to at least 640MB (the 128MB module you already have, and replace the 64MB one with a 512MB), unless you can afford to go right for 1GB, which is what I really recommend for OS X.

tooki
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:17 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,