Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Mac News > Hands On: TextExpander 6 for OS X and 4 for iOS

Hands On: TextExpander 6 for OS X and 4 for iOS
Thread Tools
NewsPoster
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2016, 10:16 AM
 
You will never read a Hands On review that does not include the price. Of course you won't, but usually price is the least significant part: whether something is expensive or not, good software and hardware is worth anything because it is so very, very useful and you use it so very, very much. TextExpander 6 is very, very good. Yet this might as well be a Hands On review of the price, and the software's shift to subscription.

If you haven't used it or read our previous enthusing about the software, what TextExpander does sounds simple but proves to be measurably useful. Using it, you type a few letters and TextExpander replaces those with something else. It can be a name that you find difficult to spell, it can be a paragraph you used to keep retyping. It can become quite remarkable and complex in ways that speed up repetitive typing actually wonderfully and pleasurably. It becomes so much a part of your Mac that you are surprised it isn't on everyone's computers.

Nonetheless, for once this has got to be about price first. That is partly because with this release, TextExpander has become software you have to subscribe to and so the price has radically changed. However, it's more because if you are an individual user of TextExpander then you will think that the price is the only thing that has altered.



It's not true: there's plenty that is different, most of it is good now and we expect it to become increasingly useful later, but TextExpander 6 does not appear much different to TextExpander 5. Again, hold on a moment there, but this is true enough that if you're an existing user you cannot fail to question why you should now pay a monthly fee for something you've already bought and got. More: the new version requires you to sync your settings across its own service, you can no longer use Dropbox or iCloud so actually this is an update that removes a feature you want.

We don't know the answer. You can most certainly argue that TextExpander is excellent –– you can't tell but we've used its features three times so far in this article –– and the makers Smile Software are pretty good themselves. We rate the company and even personally just like the people there so our heads and hearts want to support them. It's just that supporting a software company shouldn't feel like altruism. Not completely.

Then you can say –– and we'd bet Smile is hoping –– that in a few months or a year the subscription will seem normal and the fuss about the change will die down. That's certainly what's happened with Adobe and its subscription Creative Cloud. It's probably true and as time goes on, the people coming to TextExpander will be new users for whom the question is different. Rather than why should you pay for something you've already got, it will be whether TextExpander is useful enough to warrant subscribing.

Don't go comparing TextExpander's price with other software subscriptions. It costs $5 a month (existing users get a token one-year discount) and if you start thinking that's a three quarters of Microsoft Office 365's $7/month you might as well start thinking that it's not far off the $9 Netflix subscription too. Forget everything but this: is TextExpander worth $5 a month to you?



Smile has the enormous problem that new users are unlikely to truly get how good this software is: you read the description and you understand easily enough, but it's only when you have that TextExpander popping sound and it's sped up writing an invoice that you appreciate its worth. Then Smile has the other enormous problem that existing users really do come to regard TextExpander as an essential part of their Mac and that inevitably means we forget that it isn't. It's hard for a prospective user to see the value and it's easy for an existing one to forget that this is not something included in the computer.

Then when either look at the new price, they have to consider what alternatives there are and there are alternatives. If you barely use TextExpander then there actually is enough text expansion built into OS X for you. If you are a power user deeply versed in its intricacies then you could use Keyboard Maestro which is built for many other things but can do this. Then in the middle there are TextExpander's rivals such as TypeIt4Me and Typinator which at present are all one-time purchases.

TextExpander 6 needed some big tentpole feature for individual users and it does not have one. Instead, it has features that make the software compelling for teams and companies plus it brings just one new feature that would normally be headline news. With the new version 6, TextExpander comes to Windows for the first time. It's only in a beta form at the moment but this is huge. That's partly because there is precious little like TextExpander on Windows and PC users shouldn't have to suffer, but also because so many of us work switching back and forth between the two. Now you have it on both and, increasingly, you have your same settings across both.

That is very big and the new fact that you share settings across teams and whole companies is compelling. It just doesn't matter a damn to the user who works as an individual and works only on Macs or perhaps also iOS. For them, there are no new tentpole features, there are only improvements and the removal of the Dropbox or iCloud support we rely on. Some of the improvements are significant and you can see how big a deal they were to implement, but for us as users, they are pretty small.



The most visible is on the Mac where the TextExpander editor has had a makeover: it looks better, controls are in what we now see are more sensible and handy places. Then the old and rather clunky iOS version is better at keeping your TextExpander settings the same across iPhone, iPad and Mac than it was. It does that by moving these settings and preferences online to TextExpander.com. Rather than syncing back and forth between devices using Dropbox, all your devices now look up the website and so always have your latest triggers and snippets as they're called. You can look up the website directly too: log in to your account on TextExpander.com and you can see all your settings, change them, add to them, and elect to share them with other people.

This is well done and we found ourselves spotting changes we wanted to make, we found ourselves twiddling far more than usual because the online version made that clear and easy. The online sharing is also where the teams aspect comes in now and actually where we think this will become more useful for individuals later.



If you're in a team, set up your TextExpander snippets and then your colleagues can use them all. So for instance you could tell a new recruit that this is the snippet we use when replying to complaint emails. This is the one for when people ask where to find our office. Everyone gets all of these plus each person has their own personal ones and TextExpander 6 makes it so clear which is private and which is shared that you don't even think about it.

In the future and probably the very short-term near future at that, we are certain that there will be people effectively publishing their collections of TextExpander snippets for anyone to use. We're sure of that because it's already happened: there are people who have created complex and handy snippet collections that with some effort you could download and merge into yours. Now that's going to be radically easier so it will continue, it will grow, it will be useful.

Yet today, if you're an individual user of TextExpander then upgrading to version 6 is like investing in the future. It is not something that gets you a benefit now. Well, other than the continued existence of the company and that's hardly a small thing.

Yet we're having to think about this all so very much and TextExpander is supposed to save us time, not occupy us. It also requires a little bit of action. For you can get a trial version of TextExpander 6 yet you must take some steps if you're not to be stuck with it at the end of the trial period.

On your Mac, rename the TextExpander application to something like 'Old TextExpander' before you download the trial. If you don't do that, the installation will ask if you want to replace the old one and no, you do not. Not yet. For once you've replaced version 5, it's gone. At the moment you can re-download it from the official website if you decide you don't want to keep version 6, but there's no guarantee that this will continue to be true.



On iOS, you have no choice: you cannot install the new TextExpander app without deleting the old one. Again, right now you can redownload the old one from App Store but again, there's no guarantee that will continue. We won't miss the old iOS app but you have to have it around if other apps are to get updated with your latest snippets.

So you're having to take precautions, you're having to ponder the value of the software to you, you're really having to think about whether to use this new version and you're doing that without any clear benefit to you as an individual. We want to say yes, upgrade, and we do know that if we step back to version 5 we will miss the updated TextExpander editor, but by far the easiest thing to do now is to stay with the existing one.

Smile cautions that, of course, there's got to be a limit to how long you can continue using version 5: while the firm will support it for a time, there will come a point when some change in OS X breaks it. That's fair enough and it's an inevitable part of using any software, but as reasons to upgrade go it's poor: buy it now to get features you don't need and lose one you do or buy it later before it breaks.

TextExpander has fans and so it should: we count ourselves among them. It's still always been a difficult sell because of this way that you only appreciate the enormous usefulness of it after you've bought. So what version 6 does is keep that difficulty about convincing new users and added a complexity about convincing existing ones to continue.

Despite all the clear effort and we'd say talent that has gone into the TextExpander.com business of sharing, despite how this is in many ways a big step forward for the application, and despite how in the future we'll get used to the subscription, this upgrade has not gone well. It needed something much more visibly advantageous to individual users because right now most or perhaps even every user of TextExpander is an individual.

It's easy to say there needs to be some big new feature when we've no idea what it might be or actually whether there could even be one: TextExpander 5 does a huge amount and we are addicted to it, maybe there simply isn't anything that 6 could add. In which case these moves are the only ones available to the company.

Again, in the future when new users come to try TextExpander they won't be comparing it to the old version, they will be analysing its value to them. As we have become so profoundly keen on TextExpander we'd say it was an essential app and it continues to be worth a very great deal. We'd probably say yes, pay the subscription. Probably. We can't help but eye up the competition where we practically ignored them before because TextExpander is so good.

We just can't say that existing users should upgrade. We can't. We want to, we do, but right now existing users already have all of the features of TextExpander 6 that are important and vital. That's got to be why the firm no longer sells TextExpander 5 or its iOS counterpart: it would be good to give people the choice but when they have that option, currently the sensible thing is to buy the old one.

Take the precautions, try the trial. We want to support Smile Software: it is important to support good companies doing excellent apps but we subscribe to so much now, we have subscription fatigue as well as limits on our bank accounts, that we need better reasons than we've got so far.

TextExpander 6 requires OS X 10.10 or higher and TextExpander for iPhone and iPad requires iOS 9 or higher. The beta TextExpander for Windows needs Windows 7 or better. The cost of a TextExpander subscription is $5/month (reduced to $4 if paid annually and for one year only to $2/month for existing users). For teams and companies the cost is $10/month per user (reducing to $8 if billed annually). There is a one-year discount for existing users which brings that to $4/month but only for the number of users your company already had license for.

Who is TextExpander for:
What are you asking here, really? If you mean who is the software for then that's not changed: everyone would benefit from having this. If you mean the new software as a service, the subscription model, then we'd still say everyone would benefit but the value to you is far harder to assess. Far harder. You're pressing us now, we can tell, but the best we can call it is this: if you have TextExpander 5, stick with it, and if you haven't, check out the trial. That's a cop-out, sorry, but it's actually what we're doing now: at this moment we're leaning to subscribing but we are hesitating. Our mood changes to subscribing when we realise that on a typical day we might use TextExpander 80 times and our mood changes back again when Netflix and Apple Music take their subscriptions from our accounts.

Who is TextExpander not for:
If you don't write much, it was never a great benefit to you, really, and now it is not worth the subscription.

-William Gallagher (@WGallagher)

Readers: do you have an app that you'd like to see us review? Developers: do you want us to take a look at your app? Send your suggestions to our Tips email.
( Last edited by NewsPoster; Apr 8, 2016 at 10:35 AM. )
     
davidlfoster
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2016, 11:20 AM
 
This has become suckware, the software equivalent of a virtual parasite. It's simply not defensible. I've used it for years, but now will move on to an alternative. Macnn would do us a service by revisiting the alternatives and diligently assessing their comparative capabilities. Come on, I get Photoshop CC and Lightroom CC from Adobe for $10 a month. There is NO WAY this subscription comes anywhere close to the value of that one. They are either kidding themselves or they are seriously deluded. Goodbye TextExpander.
     
tvalleau
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2016, 11:44 AM
 
I too used TE for many years, but when this subscription model came out, I wrote them an email explaining why (the very reasons this article covers) I'm abandoning the software. There are simply too many alternatives. (In fact, I use Keyboard Maestro, and love it. Making the switch to add my few TE macros was trivial.)

What, IMHO, is a highest viable price for a TE subscription? Maybe $15 or $20 per year. $60 per year is what I'm paying for the Photoshop-half of my Adobe subscription... and TE isn't remotely close to the level of software that Photoshop occupies.

I agree: "Thanks, Smile - you're good folks... but no thanks."
     
Charles Martin
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Maitland, FL
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2016, 11:48 AM
 
You can rest assured that we will be taking a look at the "buy-once" alternatives to Textexpander. While we have high regard for the people behind Smile and rate their software highly, we have always been interested in everything that's out there in this area, so we will be looking at those options as well.
Charles Martin
MacNN Editor
     
fharvell
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Apr 2016
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2016, 07:43 PM
 
I cannot express how disappointed I am to se SmileOnMyMac move to a subscription model for their wonderful products.

The subscription model only benefits the provider while extorting fees from the subscriber. The incentive to produce a quality product is removed because of the requirement for the customer to "pay the fee" if they simply want to continue using the product they have. Worse yet, if the provider goes out of business or drops the product line, the customer is simply stuck with no recourse.

SmileOnMyMac's proposed "benefits" of the subscription service to the customer are that it:

...frees you as customers and us as developers from the "upgrade treadmill." We can offer our apps free of charge. We can deliver incremental improvements as they're ready rather than wait and package them all into a new "big" upgrade release. We're really excited about what this change will allow us to offer our customers...

Of course SmileOnMyMac is excited. Every customer converted becomes a forced revenue stream for more than the full price of the previous application every year. The customer must pay or lose it all. SmileOnMyMac is freed from having to innovate or even improve their product evermore as the customer has to pay again and again just to keep the service they have. The subscription model simply removes the development incentive from the equation. There is no need to create a value proposition that entices people to spend more money for compelling new products or features.

Even the original proposed benefit of the subscription model originally touted as "helping to revolutionize the industry" by providing applications in the subscription model at a significantly lower cost than the purchased license model, is summarily disregarded by SmileOnMyMac. SmileOnMyMac, instead is forcing people to pay more than the full cost of the past application for each year of "service". This is not cheaper. At least Adobe had the courtesy to significantly reduce the cost of their suite when they went to the subscription model. Then they also began to add "subscription" features that increased the value, and, at least partially justified the subscription fees. (Although the lock-in and inability to recover from a provider failure still exists.)

Yes, SmileOnMyMac does offer additional benefits through their new text expander.com syncing service. I might even be willing to pay for the service. Of course, the prior, exiting method of syncing is adequate for my needs and doesn't cost me $60 / year. If the new subscription service cost $12 / year, it might be interesting. That lower cost, and including the "free" software, becomes interesting. And more in line with the promise of the subscription model. I would be even more willing to spend money on the updated, permanently licensed, application (and upgrades) along with a $12 / year subscription service.

The subscription model, doesn't work. I won't buy an application that I will become dependent upon that I might loose access to just because I don't, or can't, make a payment. The subscription model benefits only the provider.
     
ruurd
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2016
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 9, 2016, 04:08 PM
 
Sorry. I really cannot justify paying 60 bucks a year for an unnecessary syncing service. I already have a gazillion of those and I don't want to be saddled with yet another one. In fact I think the 60 bucks is a DOWNgrade from version 5.
If Smile does not mend the error in their ways I will wait and see what Alfred has to offer in version 3 which I think covers my text expanding needs quite well from the looks of it and subsequently I will decommission TextExpander. It used to be the go-to app for this but Smile is wasting the product in this way.
     
Steve Wilkinson
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Prince George, BC, Canada
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 9, 2016, 04:22 PM
 
On the plus side, Dropbox really isn't a great 'sync' solution, though it works for simple stuff. I can see why they went to this solution, which, no doubt, took some development work on their end.

But, I'm also a bit miffed with this move. I stuck with this tool/company when they went through the whole iOS transitions where the product didn't work well at all (or syncing between platforms was broken). And, paid for a number of upgrades on both OSX and iOS. I've put more money into this tool then most utilities. That said, it's a pretty important one in my overall workflow... so I'll probably have to eventually 'upgrade.'

This would be a great opportunity for competition, though, as I agree with others, the pricing is kinda-nutso! The special pricing would be more in-line. I'm more than happy to use subscriptions and SaaS (as long as they have an annual purchase option... I don't like all these little monthly charges, typically), but the actually total cost has to be inline with reality. $48/yr for a - yes - useful utility, is somewhat steep, IMO.... compared to just about any other software I use.

And, yea, for people who depend on this tool daily (as I do), we'll probably pay. But, this kind of puts it outside of reasonableness for people who only use it now and then. I have the same issue with Parallels. I think companies like this need to dream up a better model that fits both the intense, dedicated user, and the more occasional user. And, at some point, even the dedicated user will begin to look elsewhere. (That's happened in other industries, Adobe being a great example, or CAD software. I'm sure it applies to utilities as well, if not even more-so.)
------
Steve Wilkinson
Web designer | Christian apologist
cgWerks | TilledSoil.org
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,