Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Enthusiast Zone > Art & Graphic Design > Quick Logo Assistance

Quick Logo Assistance
Thread Tools
gautch
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Over there->
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 14, 2005, 01:43 PM
 
Im stuck on a design for a logo for a friends VFX shop. He wanted somthing to do with DNA, but not directly. Kind of hint tward it. Let me know what you think. And if you have any better ideas!

     
SUPER_DEFORMED
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Dec 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 14, 2005, 10:05 PM
 
go with #1.... looks good
     
mitchell_pgh
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 15, 2005, 10:24 AM
 
Originally Posted by SUPER_DEFORMED
go with #1.... looks good

I agree... #1
     
birdman
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Ohio, near Cleveland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 15, 2005, 11:40 AM
 
Of the three, I think #3 is the easiest to read, thus making the name quicker to register in the person's mind... I think. I don't really think of "DNA" with any of them, but I'm not sure how that would relate to the company anyway, unless there's some important tie-in.

-birdman
     
andi*pandi
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 15, 2005, 12:25 PM
 
I'm gonna go with #3... although the swoop is a tired thing, of these choices it seems the best.

also not getting any DNA vibe from any of them.
     
mitchell_pgh
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 15, 2005, 11:59 PM
 
I feel like if you went with #3... the "new" could go away... like it's a promo or something.
     
gautch  (op)
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Over there->
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 16, 2005, 05:47 PM
 
Well it looks like they scratched the #2.. so theyare deciding between #1 and #3. My personal guess is they will go with #3. Thanks everyone!
     
KeriVit
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In the South
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 16, 2005, 11:25 PM
 
what a large sig you have!
     
budster101
Baninated
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois might be cold and flat, but at least it's ugly.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 17, 2005, 02:34 PM
 
Nice signature, but a wee-tad-bit too large.

Should be 200 x 50 so I've been told.
     
mitchell_pgh
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 18, 2005, 11:39 AM
 
Originally Posted by budster101
Nice signature, but a wee-tad-bit too large.

Should be 200 x 50 so I've been told.
I was just going to post the same thing...
     
York911
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: oHIo
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 19, 2005, 09:24 AM
 
It looks like you used a default Illustrator brush. I would suggest making/using a custom brush specifically for this situation.
I have unexpectedly quit.

Dual G5 2Ghz :: 4 GB :: OSX 10.4.x
     
   
Thread Tools
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:32 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,