|
|
Quick Logo Assistance
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Over there->
Status:
Offline
|
|
Im stuck on a design for a logo for a friends VFX shop. He wanted somthing to do with DNA, but not directly. Kind of hint tward it. Let me know what you think. And if you have any better ideas!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Dec 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
go with #1.... looks good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by SUPER_DEFORMED
go with #1.... looks good
I agree... #1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Ohio, near Cleveland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Of the three, I think #3 is the easiest to read, thus making the name quicker to register in the person's mind... I think. I don't really think of "DNA" with any of them, but I'm not sure how that would relate to the company anyway, unless there's some important tie-in.
-birdman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm gonna go with #3... although the swoop is a tired thing, of these choices it seems the best.
also not getting any DNA vibe from any of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
I feel like if you went with #3... the "new" could go away... like it's a promo or something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Over there->
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well it looks like they scratched the #2.. so theyare deciding between #1 and #3. My personal guess is they will go with #3. Thanks everyone!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In the South
Status:
Offline
|
|
what a large sig you have!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois might be cold and flat, but at least it's ugly.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Nice signature, but a wee-tad-bit too large.
Should be 200 x 50 so I've been told.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by budster101
Nice signature, but a wee-tad-bit too large.
Should be 200 x 50 so I've been told.
I was just going to post the same thing...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: oHIo
Status:
Offline
|
|
It looks like you used a default Illustrator brush. I would suggest making/using a custom brush specifically for this situation.
|
I have unexpectedly quit.
Dual G5 2Ghz :: 4 GB :: OSX 10.4.x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|