|
|
Why no integrated TV tuner?
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't understand why the new iMac doesn't have an integrated TV tuner. Front Row is a decent application, but it seems to me that its really not living up to its full potential without an option for watching and recording TV. You can do anything separately without it, but I think I would be more likely to use it if it had TV functionality.
If Apple truly wants to be kind of the "media center" arena, I don't know why they are not adding that last touch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Limited to analog only (limited channels, no HD) or expensive/difficult CableCards, and of course it would hurt iTunes TV sales.
I think the latter is the same reason iTunes doesn't add DVD ripping support.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
iTunes CANNOT add DVD ripping support for commercial DVDs because that would necessarily entail decryption for subsequent conversion, which is completely and utterly illegal in more countries than not.
The film studios Apple has been courting for iTunes movie sales would be out of the deal at the drop of a hat.
As for TV: What kind? HDTV? Analog? DVB-T? DVB-S? PAL/NTSC? What about encodings? various digital networks require decoders.
Offer all of these, and figure another $300 on the price of the machine, and you're probably still not supporting some regional variant.
It would be a bit like adding radio to the iPod and making *every* customer pay for stuff they're explicitly trying to GET AWAY from.
I have an iPod so I *don't* have to listen to the radio.
I have a media collection on my computer because I hate watching television.
Make it optional, and you the fitting solution for everybody.
That's where elgato steps up to the bat. The end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Then why did the author of DeCSS go to prison?
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by iFan
If Apple truly wants to be kind of the "media center" arena, I don't know why they are not adding that last touch.
Where do you read Apple wanted this? Just think that other people do not want to watch tv on their iMac so Apple would be ill-advised to have all customers to pay what only a few want. Besides the space within an iMac appears to be limited.
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
He "faced prison," and was acquitted-twice. And NOTHING about the licensing agreement has anything to do with DeCSS. The issue with that was that supposedly private algorithms were either reverse engineered or leaked-almost certainly reverse engineered because they were, let's say "less than difficult to figure out."
mduell, that's a great article.
|
Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Big Mac
Then why did the author of DeCSS go to prison?
The author of DeCSS didn't go to prison. Also, that's entirely different (reverse engineering instead of licensing) than what I'm suggesting. Apple has already licensed CSS from the DVD CCA for DVD Player.app.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
The problem is, the MPAA doesn't recognize fair use of its products. Apple had a hard enough time convincing the record cartel to play ball given CD audio ripping. I don't see the MPAA budging.
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
What I was talking about is that even where developing such software isn't illegal, and it's perfectly illegal to OWN backup copies of your digital media, circumventing copy protection in order ot obtain one usually IS illegal.
And Apple's license for the CSS decoder is most CERTAINLY tied to *extremely* specific terms for playback that no way in HELL include video transcoding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Doesn't matter if DVD decoding is illegal or not - if Apple were to do it, the studios would jump ship from iTunes Movie Store.
Adding a TV tuner is not as easy as it sounds, because Apple is an international company, and there are at least 3 different incompatible analog standards spread over the world, and neither of the installed bases is small enough to be ignored. If you think digital - and you should, because everyone is moving to it - you have to support at the very least DVB-T, DVB-C, DVB-S and an optional CA module for encoded transmissions. I could see a digital-only solution, with a CA-module as a BTO, once the digital transition is complete in the US (2009, which puts it after most of Europe) but not before then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
DVD ripping on a Mac, without third party tools? Ha, that will be the day. You can't even take a screenshot while the DVD player is running.
There are no TV tuners pre-installed in Macs because there too many different TV standards, and Apple likes to offer one size fits all computers. Would be nice if they'd knock off $100 bucks of tuners though, instead of printers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Bellevue, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't think Apple is going to that direction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Somewhere
Status:
Offline
|
|
You can simply add Elgato's EyeTV USB dongle. I have two of them. I much prefer it to a built-in solution and it receives HD programming for free along with DVR functions. Apple is smart not to include one in the sense that people would complain that they are paying for something they are not using such as a 56k modem. If someone wants to use dial up then they can pay separate for it to be installed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Aberdeen, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Another downside of a pre-installed TV tuner is that, in the UK, you'd have to pay a TV license when you bought your iMac, even if you never watched TV. I don't watch TV, and I no longer even have one, so I don't pay a TV license as a result. However, when you buy a device capable of receiving and displaying television signals, the seller is required by law to take down your name and address, and notify the TV Licensing Board that you've purchased something you can watch TV on. So, by buying the new iMac, I'd be forced to get a TV license, or face a really stiff fine.
As such, I'm personally glad they haven't put them into the new iMac, and I do agree with the analysis offered above regarding the technical difficulties this presents due to regional variations, and--of course--cost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ~/
Status:
Offline
|
|
Slingbox Tuner.
Works great; just as good as a built-in tuner.
I've got one in another room, hidden behind a bookshelf, networked to my Macs (and PC) via a powerline ethernet adapter. Full 30 fps, stereo audio. Can't record, but that's the only (minor) downside.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|