|
|
Umax S900
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Anybody run a dual processor S900 with OS X?
Can it see/use both CPUs?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Storrs,Connecticut, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Since the OS needs to be tailored to run on specific hardware and considering that the Umax S900 is both old and non-Apple, I would expect the chances that Apple, or anyone else, has customized the OS to work on that hardware to be nil. Even if OS X could run, it would probably be quite slow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Status:
Offline
|
|
Nope, OS X only supports dual G4s. Dual 604s will not be recognized... it'll only see one of them.
|
"That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario!" *wheeze*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have read conflicting reports. Some saying that OS X (10.1 and earlier) is, at the very least, mildly Dual 604e aware. I have also read other reports that have said OS X has ZERO awareness of pre-G4 MP configs.
Basically, if you have the Dual S900 right now, load up 10.1 with XPF and give it a shot. Let us know how it goes.
|
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Waragainstsleep:
Anybody run a dual processor S900 with OS X?
Can it see/use both CPUs?
No, xpostfacto does not allow use of DP and that is the only way you could ever get OS X on that machine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|